All Channels
Popular
Approvals 11/3 ▼
Relientk77 (3) - 4725d ago Cancel
doctorstrange (3) - 4725d ago Cancel
Lavalamp (4) - 4725d ago Cancel
princeofthabay (1) - 4725d ago Cancel
90°

The Patch #06

The Patch talks Aussie Game Ratings and Ellen Paige.

Read Full Story >>
roosterteeth.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Caps
adamandkate4722d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed: title
Emilio_Estevez4721d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4725d ago
ASBO-54725d ago (Edited 3470d ago )

Ah, I remember when RvB was relevant! What ever happened to ub3rfry? He could spam 30 pages in 30 seconds!!

40°

TLOU Part 3 Story May Explore Congregation Of Immune People;Part 2 Initially Had Dynamic Time Of Day

The story in part 3 of Sony Interactive Entertainment and Naughty Dog's The Last of Us series may explore a "congregation of immune people."

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community44d ago
DivineHand12543d ago

Part 3? I thought Niel Druckmann said there will be no part 3.

50°

Ex-Naughty Dog Dev: Big Studios Are 'Forced' to Hire Like Factories

Former Naughty Dog artist Gabriel Betancourt explains why the "sweet spot" for game teams is under 200 people and how AAA "factories" kill creativity.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community45d ago
45d ago
phongtro123_com45d ago

There’s definitely some truth to this. When teams get too large, coordination starts to outweigh creativity—layers of approval, risk aversion, and tight deadlines can turn bold ideas into “safe” ones. Keeping a team under ~200 people sounds ideal for maintaining clear communication and a shared vision. That said, massive AAA projects also come with huge technical demands and expectations, so scaling up isn’t always avoidable. The real challenge is figuring out how to keep that small-team creativity alive inside big studio structures.

DarXyde44d ago

More than that, it's logistically untenable. Inevitably, when teams get too large, how do you keep tabs on accountability? I suspect this massive team size is a consequence of the perfectionism streak Naughty Dog has.

I wish we could have so many people working on something and it turns out great because I'm all for collaboration in spirit - the problem is too many people as part of the larger team and smaller units. Suppose for example that you have too many people in the art department; you will very often come up against fiercely competing visions for how things should look. That competitive vision will cause friction between team members, team doesn't work as a unit, the back and forth can further delay parts that the other departments are waiting for, etc etc.

A 200-person team says, to me, that we need to scale back game development. Even if it means we go back to PS2 era costs and scale, why not? Those games are still great fun, the budgets were in check, and you could literally break the 200-man team into like 10 20-man teams working on different projects.

30°

The Last of Us Part I PS5 Review: A Definitive, Pricey Remake

The Last of Us Part I PS5 review covering visuals, combat feel, accessibility, performance modes, and whether it is really worth the asking price of $69.99.

Read Full Story >>
spawningpoint.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community154d ago
Changed: content
SpawningPoint155d ago