All Channels
Popular
180°

Titanfall creator explains lack of single player

Titanfall is a multiplayer-only experience. Respawn Entertainment co-founder Vince Zampella told GamesIndustry International that keeping the focus on multiplayer battles was a deliberate response to player habits and studio size.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
BadboyCivic4718d ago

Single player for COD 4 was actually good

3-4-54717d ago

No your not....didn't they just say it's Xbox only ?

They said they couldn't do it on PC....soooooo

elhebbo164717d ago

@3-4-5 Its coming to PC, 360 and Xbone.

3-4-54717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

COD 1,2,3 & WaW, yea those Single player campaigns were really good.

All the modern warfare and Black ops campaigns are garbage though.

So all the WW2 games are legit.

We need a next gen WW2 shooter please.

dendenmooshi4717d ago

Ya, they really are good. They keep the suspense high. The only knock on them is that they are usually very short.

Mystogan4717d ago

Looks like the COD makers are ready to revolutionize the shooter genre..AGAIN.

Mr_Nuts4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Nothing in TitanFall looked like it was going to revolutionize anything.

It's basically COD with nicer graphics, mechanoids and a sci fi space setting. Basically what the real COD4 sequel should of been like in terms on improvment.

4717d ago
MidnytRain4717d ago

I think "a true sequel to CoD4" would appeal to good bit of people.

3-4-54717d ago

TitanFall is what COD probably should have evolved into had they not had yearly releases and tried to milk a once great franchise.

They wanted to evolve beyond same old and activision wasn't having that.

Transporter474717d ago

The Power of the Cloud!!!/s

I think they just prefer to concentrate on what they are good at which is MP so why waste resources on SP.

vickers5004717d ago

That's good. In the same way that many single player games don't need multiplayer, there are some multiplayer games that do not need single player, and this is one of those titles (for now anyways, I wouldn't mind seeing a campaign from them in the future when the team is bigger and much more successful, basically able to have the resources to do both without sacrificing content from one or the other).

MidnytRain4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Exactly. As soon as a dev learns that it can't please everyone, they can focus on their own vision of what makes their game fun. This was the way CoD started going anyway. The vast majority of CoD's target audience don't even touch the campaign. It's best not to kid themselves.

Show all comments (52)
50°

EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch

EA is laying off an unknown number of individuals from across its Battlefield teams, including workers at Criterion, Dice, Ripple Effect, and Motive Studios, IGN understands.

72d ago Replies(1)
peppeaccardo71d ago

When logic meets EA it generates anti-matter ..... so try not to apply it in any meaningful way. Entropy is what matters in there !!

badz14971d ago

cue the apologist saying that these are mostly just contractors hired for this specific project bla bla bla

HyperMoused71d ago

TTK for BF employees needs adjusting

50°

EA makes layoffs at Skate developer Full Circle

The free-to-play reboot topped 15 million players in under three weeks, but EA now claims it needs to reshape the development team.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Profchaos83d ago

The community warned them this would happen but nope they knew better they continued with the live service push the made the art style cartoonish and this is the result

isarai_lee83d ago

It's always so bizarre when studios announce something super early in development under the suggestion of forming the game to player feedback, and then they push against all feedback heading straight for the cliff while everyone is warning them along the way

badboyz0983d ago (Edited 83d ago )

🤣🤣🤣

50°

US Lawmakers Urge Review Of EA Sale

The Congressional Labor Caucus sent a letter to the FTC warning the debt-financed, largely PIF-owned deal could be bad news for workers

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Trilithon117d ago

lol ya think? they're sending all that work to the cheaper labor market as soon as possible. and FYI, that labor market has exploded in the last 5-10 years. They have enough people to replace every single job. But honestly, EA is over filled with useless upper management as it is. You could probably trim 25% of their staff with no real loss in production. They aren't gamers, they're business execs. Just look at how many AI related jobs they're already starting to post. Its also hilarious that PIF owns Battle field 6

lodossrage117d ago (Edited 117d ago )

Wait,

The same congress that attacked Lina Khan when she fought the Microsoft Activision purchase.
The same congress that allowed Disney to buy 90% of Fox
The same congress that allowed Liv Golf to buy the PGA
The same congress that sits back while Paramount tries a hostile takeover despite losing the bid for Warner Bros.

NOW, the suddenly cares about doing what's "right" for works? Yeah, right.

thorstein117d ago

No. There were elections and some of the scum were replaced.

TheColbertinator117d ago

Different elections. Different scum. Same results.

rlow1117d ago

i know its a long shot, but i hope this gets shot down.

ZwVw117d ago

EA now owned by The Saudis and Ubisoft to inevitably be owned by China. In hindsight, once EA and Ubisoft started having their financial woes, they should have pulled a Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco by merging their operations into one.