All Channels
Popular
Approvals 11/3 ▼
jaredhart (3) - 4729d ago Cancel
CouldHaveYelledUiiW (1) - 4729d ago Cancel
paleselan (2) - 4729d ago Cancel
Murad (1) - 4729d ago Cancel
BullyMangler (1) - 4729d ago Cancel
zaminoda (2) - 4729d ago Cancel
Digital_Anomaly (1) - 4729d ago Cancel
160°

Why Nintendo Failed at E3

BNR: E3 may only last three days, but a lot of news and previews come out of those few days. So many new games are revealed that it can be quite the overload for gamers. And with the introduction of two new gaming consoles hitting the market this fall, there was a lot to be excited for.

Every year the Big 3 (Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo) have high priced, over the top conferences to present their new software and plans for the coming year. This year was the same with the exception of Nintendo. Rather than spend a large amount of money for a two hour conference on stage, the company decided to stream their conference online in the same way they have been doing the Nintendo Direct videos. This was a smart move on their part, since both Microsoft and Sony would be showcasing the many games that would be coming to their next gen consoles. And since Nintendo had already released the Wii U, this allowed them to show us great software in development for the system that would tap into the functionality of the system’s gamepad. This was Nintendo’s moment to go big and wow us with games that would look great, play well, and pull in more sales for the console.

Read Full Story >>
blackmannrobin.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4729d ago
BullyMangler4729d ago

Nintendo failed because all they showed at this years E3 was a bunch of trailers with not much gameplay of their games

. also Nintendo failed E3 2013 because most of the things they showcased were typical 1st person shooters and a bunch of War Games, you know the stuff big boys are into, not one UNIQUE game at nintendos booth like sony or microsoft brought (: . .

ha haa Nintendo showed nothing but trailers, kiddy game trailers that cater 0nly to families . not like sony or microsoft where they showcased truly Adult rated and gory content with crazy < gamePlay like bayonetta 2 at sony and microsofts booth hua haaa

freaking nintendo, is time to grow up!!

dedicatedtogamers4729d ago

I think Nintendo failed E3 for the same reason Microsoft failed E3: they both failed to address their fans' concerns.

Microsoft...well, this should be obvious.

Nintendo needed to prove to people why the Wii-U was a viable, vibrant, exciting system. Instead, they basically confessed "we squandered our one-hear launch headstart". The games announced were not surprising in the least, though it was a pleasure to see more footage of Project X.

And worse, they failed to showcase the tablet as a "must have" control scheme.

kirbyu4729d ago

"also Nintendo failed E3 2013 because most of the things they showcased were typical 1st person shooters and a bunch of War Games"

Eh....what.

The thing about Bayonetta 2.

Ok, are you joking, because, that isn't funny.

BullyMangler4729d ago

viewer discretion is advised for bayonetta 2.

pervy game = sin = nintendo exclusive = peculiar dominance .. . :)

3-4-54729d ago

They showed more gameplay than Sony or Microsoft so not sure what E3 you were watching.

How many PS4 & XB1 games could you play last week at Best Buy ?

Only 4 Wii U games and nothing else.

How is that not gameplay ?

Your trying too hard.

n4f4729d ago

i get what you are saying but you failed at being funny

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4729d ago
Mr_Nuts4729d ago (Edited 4729d ago )

They are too traditional, thats why. They are stuck in their ways and seem torn over going back to where they were and wanting to recapture the success of the Wii.

Iwata needs to go though, it's time to change things up

cyguration4729d ago

Monolith Soft's 'X' tells me they didn't fail. I want that game and I will get a Wii U for it.

Hadoukameha4729d ago

X. That's one game. Thy need to multiply that by 100.

My_Name_BTW_Is_Dante4729d ago

The only thing that fails is the site that put out this "opinion piece" (of course that's a given with the name of the site).

BosSSyndrome4729d ago

I don't know what this guy expected. Did he NOT want a new mario game? Would he rather they DIDN'T show smash bros.? Why is it that Nintendo loses points for things they didn't show like "Earthbound" and "Chrono Trigger" (wtf), yet they gain no points for what they DID show?
He doesn't mention how cool the X trailer was. He doesn't mention how EVERY trailer had gameplay in it. He doesn't seem to care at all that these games ARE what Wii U needs and he acts like they should've shown something different?
Honestly this is more of a criticism of the Wii U rather than a criticism of Nintendo's E3...

Hadoukameha4729d ago

Earthbound, Metroid, F-Zero, Kid Icarus, Star Fox, and Wii U Zelda were absent, among other titles. Sorry but showing a few decent things is not okay when you ignore twice as much.

TheDivine4729d ago (Edited 4729d ago )

Sony skipped uncharted, resistance, Socom, mag, war hawk, syphon filter, god of war, twisted metal, the last guardian, LBP, ratchet, sly, jak and daxter, legend of dragoon (people have begged for a decade), and whatever other console games they have (that's all I can think of).

They also didnt show a single vita game other than announcing it will receive ports of FFX, GOW 1/2, flower, and the walking dead. They announced ZERO new vita games, NOT ONE!

Sony mainly gets points for a 400 dollar console and not blocking used games, instead they will leave it up to the publishers. They also added a fee to play mp. That was the only advantage they had over ms until ms went off the deep end and hitlered up their new console. Ms did show killer titles though. Titian fall, quantum break, killer instinct, insomniacs new game, forza, and others. Ms also stole exclusivity from vs13, mgs, and kingdom hearts which is huge. I bought a ps3 for mgs4 and ffvs13 which ironically I have to buy a newer console to play. Jokes on me I guess.

ape0074729d ago

^^^^^^

100% the truth

Show all comments (42)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community59d ago
Changed: title, content, url, credit url
Christopher60d ago
Relientk7760d ago (Edited 60d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community82d ago
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community84d ago
Deathdeliverer84d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi83d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure83d ago (Edited 83d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer84d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot84d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box84d ago (Edited 84d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno84d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay84d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno82d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK83d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)