Maybe you will be the one to make all of this suffering worth something at the end

MsclMexican

Contributor
CRank: 6Score: 17220

User Review : The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Ups
  • The world of Skyrim is vast- You can always find new things to see
  • Sound is incredible from the sounds of wandering Skyrim to the music when you engage in battle
  • You can play the way you want to play
Downs
  • Some glitches... Flying Mammoths FTW
  • Bethesda has repeated the curse of bad PS3 ports

This game I have been wanting to play for a long time.... and unfortunately it won't let me

When Todd Howard came out on stage at the VGA's last year the nerd's of the world had their hearts skip a beat when The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim was announced. We were teased with 15 minute gameplay demos, small morsels of information gathered in both formal and informal manners. But Skyrim is here and it is a fantastic game... the problem is that Bethesda has repeated the same mistake that they have been known for this console generation.

When starting out Skyrim Elder Scrolls fans know what to expect, you are on your way to your own execution and are then presented with a character creation screen. The character creation system is so vast with multiple races from Khajiit's to Dark Elves. I decided to play as a Dark Elf, hoping to develop my skills by raising my majicka and learning new shouts. I wanted to join the Dark Brotherhood, harass the towns people, become a werewolf. I wanted to marry a girl local to Whiterun and then settle down once I defeated Alduin: The world eating dragon. That is what I love about Skyrim. I had the power to carve my own path, to create my own narrative. It's something Bethesda has truly shown that they have mastered this art of creating games in which the player can truly make their own tale.

The gameplay in Skyrim depends on how you want to play. Do you want to be an archer, taking out enemies from a distance? You can do it. Do you want to be the soldier type, rushing in with two swords... hacking and slashing your way to victory? You can do it. Do you want to be a stealthy Khajiit assassin? You can do it. The gameplay variation is almost endless in Skyrim. However, the great thing is that you are not bound by choices that you make like in other RPG's. Did you get tired of shooting spells from your hands? You can swap out and become a brute. Skyrim is a game with no restriction's in player choice. This game was designed for you, and you decide how the game goes.

But I still have not even talked about what else makes Skyrim so great, the music that ramps up during every encounter. The intense battles with dragons that are filled with tension and excitement. I still have not fully talked about everything this game has to offer, as I can not as I feel that it is a task to impossible to accomplish as there is so much content.

That is why it is so hard to review a game like Skyrim, as you feel like you can't review the game until you hit that 100% complete, in fear that you are missing something out. I have spent approximately 80 hours playing Skyrim, and I know what many are thinking while reading this review. HOW CAN YOU REVIEW THIS GAME WITH SUCH LITTLE PLAY TIME? Well the truth is Skyrim won't let me play it anymore.

This is because I decided to buy Skyrim on the PS3. And this is where Bethesda has ruined this game. Many people may have heard of the 6mb save problem players on the ps3 are having. I am one of those people afflicted by this problem. My experience with Skyrim is no longer as incredible as the moment I put that disk in the slot. Now it is a jagged, slow, irritating version of its former self. I believed an editor at Gamesradar said it best "Watch the Skyrim gameplay trailer and pause every two seconds for an accurate representation of Skyrim on PS3" The framerate has dropped so much, that I honestly can not play this game anymore. This really makes me wonder why Bethesda struggles so much when making games for PS3. Fallout 3, New Vegas, and in some cases Oblivion have all had this trouble as the PS3 versions are filled with bugs and problems, that make the game virtually unplayable. And this sucks to as I was waiting for a long time for this game, excited for it to release, but I am saddened that Bethesda has made this same mistake. I though that things would have changed, but I was wrong. This is honestly my saddest experience in gaming as Skyrim on PS3 is incredibly broken and we honestly have no clue if Bethesda is going to fix this problem on the PS3 or not. We know that a patch is incoming on Thanksgiving time in America, but will it fix the gameplay problems Skyrim has?

Skyrim is an incredible game, no one should think otherwise, but Bethesda needs to stop making PS3 gamers feel like they got bent over. I would not have minded waiting for Skyrim, If Bethesda did a similar move like Bioware did for Mass Effect 2 and properly make the game run for all consoles equally. But they did not. If you are planning on buying Skyrim, I strongly recommend you buy it for the PC or 360.

Bethesda, your games are amazing, but please you have to start showing some equality towards all gamers, in order for one side to not feel like they were cheated out of a fantastic game. In the meantime, Skyrim sits on my shelf, waiting for one day for Bethesda to fix this problem on the PS3. Im even considering selling it back in order to get a PC copy of the game. This is truly one of the saddest moments in gaming history

Score
9.5
Graphics
Skyrim is beautiful from the rigid mountain scapes to the feilds. Some strange visual glitches do occur occasionally and may sometimes ruin the immersion
9.8
Sound
Skyrim's music truly captures that epic vibe, heightening the tensity of battle
10.0
Gameplay
There are so many ways to play Skyrim, it truly is an amazing feat. I assure you that no two players will have the same experience
9.5
Fun Factor
Skyrim is ridiculously addictive. You will be completing quests by the dozens as more and more fill up. You could play this game forever
Overall
5.0
BlmThug5212d ago

Score should be minimum 9.5 since the sub scores are minimum 9.5

iamnsuperman5212d ago

"out of 10 / not an average". The review said it is a good game but has glaring bugs that ruined his experience.

Grip5209d ago

lol so he score everything with 95+ and gave the game 5/10.. nonsense

Derekvinyard135209d ago

on ps3, this dam game needs to be recalled. there is no excuse for it to be so bad with glitches. i refuse to belive that when this game was shipped no one at bethesda saw the problems. bs i got my money back dude, hope you can get urs to.

SuperNerd5204d ago

@BlmThug Dude what r u talking about . people have there own opinions man it doesent have to be above or below anything man .

consolez_FTW5212d ago (Edited 5212d ago )

I agree man. I'm about 70hrs. in on Skyrim PS3, and I can't play it anymore :(

the Fps is horrible even when I'm just doing nothing .So when I fight any type of enemy or walk into a town in Skyrim the game is unplayable because of how the game pretty much stops because of how low the Fps goes.

I wish this game would get patched!! The game is sooo awesome, but the bugs ruin it. I guess its back to MGS HD collection,Saints row 3 and some BF3 till Skyrim gets patched..

Hairyape945212d ago

I've put in more than 95 hours for Skyrim on my PS3 and my save file is currently at 12mb. I'm only getting low fps when I leave my PS3 on for 6 hours straight playing it.

PixL5212d ago

Good choice to score it like this. I have exactly the same problem with Battlefield 3: great game for me but mic bug is a total game breaker as I can't talk to my squad. I've stopped playing it until they fix it (if they fix it). That means wasted money, that means I was deceived. That actually means they broke law selling me a faulty game. If you buy a broken TV, you go and return it. Why not games? We need to start voicing our customer concerns to game companies. If you can't make a game for a platform, don't. Or hire more skilled people. Or betatesters. Or whatever. I don't care because it's you, devs, who gets the money. If you promise but won't deliver, I'll call you cheaters and thieves until you stop.

soundslike5211d ago

You guys are crazy

the games fine.

I'd be surprised if there wasn't ANY slowdown(I don't get as much as most I guess)

the only real problem I see is that the textures were condensed for 360. 5.5 gigs? really???

REALLY???

this should be at least a 8 gig install and it shows

MsclMexican5211d ago

If you are playing the 360 version your not supposed to have problems... but this is the problem we all have when playing on the ps3

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

soundslike5211d ago

0_0

my complaint was the textures were squashed to fit a dvd size, even though ON PS3 it shouldn't have to be squashed

I play on ps3

Gam3rSinceBiRTH5210d ago

That is unbelievable. I knew the ps3 version was bad but that lag is painful to watch. Now I know why you gave it such a low score. I came in here ready to defend this masterpiece but I play on the 360. Always ALWAYS buy multiplats on a 360.

arnyftw5210d ago

You people are stupid. The textures werent squashed, DVD's can take up to 9 gigs, skyrim could be 9 GB but they decided to make it 3.8 gigs on 360

Grip5209d ago

@soundslike they have almost 5GB free idiot so shut up and stop complaining about nothing

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5209d ago
Show all comments (28)
170°

Skyrim lead recalls Bethesda working their “a**es off” to make the game just 4.8GB

As The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered takes up 125GB, original designer Bruce Nesmith recalls fitting Skyrim into a tiny file size.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
jznrpg291d ago

MS could compress their games on disc

raWfodog291d ago (Edited 291d ago )

Skyrim is still my favorite ES game. I’m playing through it again right now since I never finished it.

jznrpg281d ago

Morrowind is by far my favorite. But I’m getting old and played Daggerfall Morrowind and Oblivion before Skyrim

ActualWhiteMan291d ago

Yeah totally. Definitely won’t be hacking it Nintendo 🤞🏻

😏

110°

Fallout and Skyrim show us that talented developers make great games when you leave them alone

That judicious lack of oversight permeated everything in Bethesda's RPGs, in a positive fashion.

Christopher320d ago

I much prefer a left alone Obsidian and Larian Studios. Bethesda's formula has grown old for me.

anast318d ago

Larian hit another level with DOS:2 and then took it even further with BG3. They do high quality work.

jznrpg319d ago (Edited 319d ago )

Skyrim was a letdown compared to previous games and so was Fallout 4

Kosic318d ago

I agree, I found it an interesting game. But nowhere near worth the hype (unless you include mods)

dmonee319d ago

Skyrim blew my mind when it released. That game took me to the gaming, promisedland. Going back to it when it was updated for the PS5, it felt slightly rough around the edges, but great for its time

TheColbertinator318d ago

We should leave Obsidian alone. Bethesda on the other hand should be kept under constant psychiatric observation.

anast318d ago

Skyrim feels like the game was made in a hurry with a disorganized team.

250°

Shoving Skyrim on PS3 was a “Herculean Effort” for Bethesda as devs worked tirelessly

Skyrim lead designer Bruce Nesmith looks back at the game's often unplayable PlayStation 3 port and its difficult development.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
jjb1981494d ago

I remember having to save every time I found something or every minute, whichever came first.

OtterX494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

I Platinumed the game on the PS3 within the first few months of release. That was a Herculean Effort in and of itself. I do remember straightup freezes, crashes in addition to just glitches, but I kept at it bc I had a holy mission-like determination to Plat it.

meatnormous494d ago

I did as well. Proud of that one.

franwex494d ago

One of my trophies glitched. Otherwise I would’ve platinum it too :(

just_looken494d ago

Remember fallout 3?

For me it was always back/forth skyrim or fallout 3 for the most crashes/freezes and dat fallout 3 dlc framerate

Popsicle493d ago (Edited 493d ago )

Same. Not only do I remember all you just mentioned, but the long loading screens also made an impression. The further I made it in the game, the less I wanted to move shift any objects out of there place for fear it would add to the loading time. I don’t think I could sit and stare at a single movable object in 2024 for as long as I did, and as many times as I did in 2012.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 493d ago
Friendlygamer494d ago

Both fallouts were also absolutely horrible on the ps3

walken7494d ago

I actually played the hell out of Fallout 3 on PS3. I must've been lucky because I didn't have too many issues. Platinumed it even.
Bought Skyrim for my gf at the time, and yeah that was a disaster.

JEECE494d ago

I seem to remember there being a bug in New Vegas on PS3 where you could basically break the game by wearing a particular piece of gear in a certain location but I don't remember the exact details.

I actually didn't have too much trouble with Fallout 3 on PS3. I mean it was janky but no more so than a lot of games with more ambitious worlds were on console during that generation.

ZeekQuattro494d ago

To this day I'm sure FO3 GOTY killed my fat 80gb PS3. After playing it and NV on a modern console I don't know how younger me put up with that shit.

just_looken494d ago

Dat flashing yellow light sucked so much

franwex494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

Found it for like $10 on PS3 and put 180 hours (probably 1/2 of that time loading). I had to stop due to it becoming a slideshow.

SlothLordPootus493d ago

Honestly didn't have that many issues with it on PS3 and i played 150+ hours. I know thats not the norm though.

franwex493d ago

Go back and try your old save file if you still have it. Haha.

Show all comments (27)