MOVE needs HORROR

PHOEBUS

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 9660

User Review : Resident Evil 5

Ups
  • multi-player!!!
  • heart-pumping scary action
  • heart-pumping scary action
Downs
  • controls are kind of wack

Badass-ness in the Motherland: A Review of Resident Evil 5 Gold Edition

Resident Evil 5 is like the world's most powerful magnum, the S&W M500. It can take down an elephant with one bullet, but it could also backlash and kill the user. Mind you, the S&W M500 is available for virtual purchase in RE5.
That's a weak analogy though, so let's go for something more cliche, like RE5 is a double-edged sword. What I mean by this is that RE5 is a wonderful game. It's loaded with adventure, terrifying moments, and addictive gameplay, but is suffers from poor design that Capcom could have easily evaded if they really believed in intuitive controls.

I want to get all the negatives out of the way because once past this, RE5 is absolutely phenomenal. I don't plan on spoiling any of the storyline, but in all seriousness, RE5's story is like the rest of them. However, instead of a having dumbass blonde chick who is of no absolute use in RE4, Chris Redfield (the muscle exploding protagonist) has to save Jill (from the first game) from Wesler (the antagonist), all the while having a beautiful African, gun wielding, badass cop, Sheva, help him with the zombie cleaning. Wesler wants to employ project Uroburos which will create a distortion in the balance of power of the world, blah blah blah, Chris has to eventually save the day. That's all for the plot.

So, for the juicy stuff. The largest issue I find with the game, as said above, are the character controls. The game does not allow the player to load his weapon while in motion. Humanity's future soundly sleeps on Chris Redfield's shoulders, so Capcom thought it fit to have the player simply stop in a middle of raging zombies to load his weapon just so you could fuck with humanity. No but seriously, you're immobile while loading your weapon. What's worst is when a hoard of zombies are approaching and you run out of bullets in which you automatically begin reloading because you're too occupied with smashing the R1 button. When you're frantic about living, I don't think many people pay attention as to how much ammo remains in the clip.
For the next issue, you cannot move backwards and shoot. I don't think there needs to be anymore explanation for that one. You cannot move and throw a grenade. You cannot heal yourself and move. That one is rough. Lastly, there's no dodging movement of any sort. Oh! You can't jump either. I didn't really find jumping a big issue because I never felt the need to jump in the game, but just a heads-up. These issues with control are primal. I really hope Capcom fixes this with RE6. When the video game industry is smothered with first-person shooters that actually allow the player to do all of these commands, playing RE5 is like degenerating one's concept of basic motor coordination: and we all know RE5 is about evolution and creating the superior human race bullshit.

Now, a shift from the negative into the positive. First, RE5 looks really good. For a multiplatform game, RE5 looks very nice on the PS3. There aren't many instances of screen tears or crazy lag. It's quite solid. Textures are detailed and environments are obviously disgusting, oozing with strange bodily fluids, intense chiaroscuro, and really conjures a sense of stank. Also, the script was written in English (majority of Capcom's AAA titles are in English now) so the lip synchronization is on-point.
Chris Redfield as a character is generic and cool. He's a cool guy and is like-able. I don't think anyone plays RE games for the story or the character development, so it's safe to say that there is no character development. There are the traditional good guys and bad guys and they never cross the lines.

As a last note, RE5 has sunny, bright environments that are actually terrifying. Never have I been so afraid of African shanty towns. People with corn rows that leer at you and watch you hold a woman of their own kind close to you. Oh my gosh! Could this be the reason many individuals found RE5 offensive and racist!? Or maybe because they yell things that in any normal setting, most Americans who have humor would laugh at, but the instance they have a protogenitor (or whatever the fuck it's called) virus in their system, shit gets scary. Or maybe because it's a white guy shooting black people. That's probably the most resounding reason I can think of, but there are white Africans too and Sheva and Josh (an African army soldier) shoot the Africans too.

Well to bring this review to closure, RE5 is pure fun once you get past the limitations of the controls. On top of that, Gold Edition allows you to change costumes (there are some badass costumes), go online for 4 player insanity, and play lost missions.

And on top of all of this, you don't have to do it alone. You can grab your girl-friend or your best friend, or someone you picked up off the street and play through the horrors that is the motherland.

Score
8.0
Graphics
Graphic presentation is similar to that of Capcom's Devil May Cry series and Resident Evil 4. Details are crisp and really create a sense of fictitious verisimilitude.
10.0
Sound
Sounds are panned giving you an in-depth immersion into the world of Resident Evil. Sounds are so visceral as they inform you as to what dangers lay ahead or right the fuck behind you.
8.0
Gameplay
Controls are a little of a headache at first, but soon will become seamless once used to them.
10.0
Fun Factor
Absolute mayhem and pandemonium and the best thing, you can do it with a friend. Also, you can unlock infinite ammo after one play-through which makes the game infinitely more fun. No pun intended.
8.0
Online
I really haven't played much online but from what I did, I got my ass kicked. There small battles of couples dueling couples. It's fun once you get the hang of it but jumping in for the first time, prepare to get your shit tossed.
Overall
8.8
The Matrix5563d ago

"controls are kind of wack" - Understatement of the century.

TheLastGuardian5562d ago

For an RE game the controls weren't all that bad. You just have to get used to them. I've played through RE5 6 times, 5 times to platinum and another time with Move. It's even more fun when you play co-op with a friend. It's a great game you just have to expect a good action game not a Resident Evil game.

Buffniceguy5562d ago

Play it with the move so much better trust me :)

lex-10205562d ago

I really like the game with Move controls. It justified a rebuy.

PHOEBUS5560d ago

I will definitely have to try it with the MOVE. How exciting!

5557d ago
Show all comments (7)
50°

Best Selling Resident Evil Games US Revealed by Circana Data

Circana data shows Resident Evil 5 as the best selling Resident Evil game in the US, ahead of Resident Evil 4 remake and Village.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
SimpleDad9h ago

So the most successful RE is the one where a white man is killing Africans.
This can't be real.

140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ723d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia723d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware730723d ago (Edited 723d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing69723d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y723d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot723d ago (Edited 723d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex723d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y722d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

RNTody697d ago (Edited 697d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07882d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde882d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude882d ago (Edited 882d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992882d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme882d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992882d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313882d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69882d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor882d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69882d ago (Edited 882d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack882d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface881d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)