Since launch, Battlefield 6 has seen its player count drop by more than 80%, and DICE seems to be too stubborn to make the necessary changes.
The Battlefield 6 roadmap for 2026 has been revealed, and it confirms a server browser is on the way alongside naval warfare and more.
Until they add bigger maps to modes other that their garbage br, im not reinstalling that, they just blatantly misled a lot of people leading up to release. And still refuse just add bigger maps which people have asked for since the beta fk EA!
Why would you assume that? Nowhere in there does it mention bigger maps, it mentions reimagined old maps, says nothing about their size
TBF - the developer does say that next month they are releasing the largest map they have released in a Battlefield yet in Golmud. (4x the size of Mirak Valley)
And then in July comes Tsuru Reef (even larger) which I actually think looks really sick
I couldn't agree less with you actually.
EA hav3 listened to the people before releasing this B6 game.
It plays much better and more battlefield like than the past 3 installments.
Personally, it's not bigger maps this game needs. They've dropped the player count which is a great compromise imo.
Bigger maps with only 32 v 32 means more running around doing nothing.
Keep the new maps coming & aiming for old style battlefield games and it's a win win for me.
Server browser should've been in there at launch, when will devs learn this? It's a feature seemingly always neglected but then added in a future update...
I remember in BF Hardline the server browser didn’t have any dedicated DLC maps, and the entire player base fell off accordingly. When people pay good money for DLC maps, they want to be able to actually play them, and that means dedicated DLC ONLY servers must be programmed into the server browser by the devs.
EA should do what Bungie did for Halo 2 in 2005. When Bungie basically invented DLC maps for online matchmaking they were smart enough to realize it could split the community. DLC maps had DEDICATED PLAYLISTS so players who spent good money on the DLC could hop right into matches. Later, the DLC maps became free and also became a MANDATORY DOWNLOAD for everyone so that the DLC maps could be integrated into all standard playlists. This prevented the game from dying and the community from being fractured.
"Battlefield 6 Dev Director Anna Norrevik has been announced as a headline speaker at Europe’s premier B2B games conference, Nordic Game Spring 2026 (NG26), which returns on 26–29 May to Malmö’s iconic Slagthuset venue." - Nordic Game.
Four industry veterans inducted into UK Games Industry Hall of Fame, including Debbie Bestwick and Jon Ingold
I loved the beta, but the maps were too small. the key reason I bought the game at release is because they promised and teased bigger maps. the fact that that came in the form of a Battle Royale mode that no one asked for completely killed the game for me, I haven't picked it up since. They can easily remedy this by ACTUALLY ADDING BIGGER MAPS to their other modes
I mean, that’s the normal behavior. This kind of game usually starts with a high player count and then drops off over time. People come, play a couple of dozen hours, and move on.
Maybe people don’t want to play the same game over and over for months? 🤷♂️
Progression is horrible especially wpns and battle pass, the 2x xp should be the norm. Needs more maps and big ones that actually feel like og BF too. Otherwise still a great game. Just lots of other games that are keeping me away, I'll definitely come back for major updates
No gamers will understand this, no matter how good FPS is, without a great map, replayability will not be there.
1. Medal Of Honor Allied Assault - Stalingrad!!!! Best small maps to exist,
2. Bad Company 2 - Arica Harbour!!!! Best long map to exist,
3. Resistance 2 - Orick!!! Beautiful enviroment
Battlefield 6 has none of it