sorry i meant to hit the agree, because i agree with you 100%.you could've made an article out of your comment.
bubbles.
if they stay focus on developing and optimizing on the ps3, i could care less if it goes multiplat.i just don't want a gimped striped down version of a game i know can be great.
i still have faith in squares ability to make great gaming experience.they've giving me some of the best for decades.
a couple of bad games ain't going to make me forget 20yrs of greatness i've experienced with their products that ez.
lol the truth hurts.
i just click on amazon and theirs 30 bundles avilable.but it has sold out next to amazon in the article.
if it is good for them
copy paste add master chief and this will sale like water in the mohabi.
anybody they get, is going to play it safe.halo is a prestigious franchise, they might be to intimidated to change what makles halo halo.
putting new ideas into the existing halo formula (my be)
changing the entire halo formula (i doubt it).
this reminds me of the 3/10 ign gave god hand.while it wasn't perfect it was a damn good beat'em up (gamespot review was good).and it took some degree of skill to play well.
if any of you played god hand at a reasonale level, you know how ridiculous that review was.
“The release of Dead Money illustrates our commitment to creating entertaining add-on content for players to enjoy in already massive games like Fallout: New Vegas.”
so i guess pc and ps3 console owners are not fans, that need the same level of commitment?..Bethesda is to in bed with M$, to the point where they alienate there fans.
when products can't speak for themselves.i'll give you a (A) for effort tho.
fianl fantasy 11 was a mix of 360 and pc gamers.
the worst game i've played this gen was two worlds and it wasn't 1/10 bad
a 1/10 means the game is broken on all levels an no fun can be had from it what-so-ever.a 1/10 means this game would fail as a paper weight.1/10 means the game isn't even functional.
i've seen this game being played on iwaggle, and know enough to say this review is bullshit an that he wanted to hate the game this much.
sony has been selling more software for the past 2 (going on three yrs).yeah M$ has 1 mega hit in halo, gears sells like 5 to 6 million (releases every 3yrs) and cod for the 360 see around 55-60% of console sells (also a annual to 2yr releases)these are M$ heavy hitters they have nothing else.
but other then that, m$ doesn't have games to sell lol.and anything thats not a shooter flops (looking at good games like alan wake).so how is this hard to grasp?...
with all the money that M$ bumped into kinect, would it be a good investment to buy bizzare?...
bizzare ain't a sure thing type of dev (like bungie or naughty dog).they will be spending $10 of millions on a potential (operative word being POTENTIAL)product, when the kinect has yet to reach it's billion dollar investment potential.
why does everyone hate hhg?..i'm just curious.
edit:why the fuck i'm i getting thumb down for asking a simple question?..
(lets see ps3 good games), uncharted 1 success, mgs4 success, lbp success, imfamous success, uncharted 2 success, kz2 success, demon's souls success, heavy rain success, gow3 success.
seems to me like having GOOD 1st party devs, that love what they do is full of win.
your comment is full of stupidity .
one in the hand is worth two in the bush.
f**k that was random.lol
it sold 8million units in the wake of cod mw and and as2 sold around 8million units aswell.
the same could be said for kinect.see how that works?
or they could do a spinoff of the forerunners war with the flood.that would be a good idea.