in your opinion would have been the appropriate response.
a huge roster with no substance is capcoms way of making you ask for dlc, when these characters are supposed to come 1st.
stay off the interwebz.
me3 is 10/10 great (minus 10mins) and the ending ain't (zomg the apocalypse is coming) bad. so f**k all this immature, unconstructive crying, and f**k chobot for not being a real professional.your in the game dummy, it shows a huge conflict of interest duh.
this is coming from the same group of consumers that brought multiple 360 with a failure rate through the roof (myself include) and constantly get sold half made games only to get dlc milked and love it, actually thinking that no use games is going to equate to the end of gaming?...
if ppl want something their going to buy it, and a couple of bucks off ain't going to change that.truth is gamestop needs publishers alot more then they need them.
publishers ...
i wish more people would read this, is all i have to say.
shadows of the damned
theeg, couldn't have put it better myself
yeah the ending suck, but that don't stop me3 from being great.9.5 for me, would be a 10 if the ending didn't suck a**
i have yet to beat the game (also playing tales of graces f and sfxt).is the ending that grotesque?..i'm only like 10hrs in and so far it's been a thrill ride.i just can't imagine the ending being that bad, when the game (so far) is great with a level of polish rarely seen (form it's predecessor's).i'm sacred to even beat the game with all this controversy surrounding the endin.
tales of graces f, ninja gaiden 3 and mass effect 3 for me.
whoever thumb you down obviously, doesn't have a sense of humor lmfao.
i hope it goes multi platform, so it can have a greater chance of success.but the 360 crowd won't support this, persona has the difficulty level of the soul series.you make 1 mistake against the weakest enemys and your dead.going multi platform usually means dumbing it down, so i can see where your coming from.
it needs to be on all platforms.pitching a storyed based single player game (on a consloe), dominated by it's online community, and multi player experience, isn't the best fit for a game like this.
is there any hope for this review?...another disgruntled ff fan of old with a vengeance...
"Recommended for XIII fans, anti-recommended for non-XIII fans. That's pretty much the deal, with this game" thats bs, i hated ff13 and i'm loving 13-2.if you want to hate the game (seems like everyone does), thats ur business but don't try and speak for everyone else.13-2 is what 13 should've been in a # of ways.if you want a soild jrpg you can't go wrong with 13-2.
troll review.if i had to assign this game a score it would be a 8.8.the story is o.k. sometimes good and touching and sometimes absurd and confusing , but teh gameplay is pure win.story is the only thing stoping this from a 9+...it's not a bad story (by no means) it just plays it to safe in it's delivery
it's not up on psn or sen ( or whatever they're calling it these days /s)
i've been very vocal about my hate for 13 (check past msg for details), to the point where i wanted 13-2 to fail.well i brought the game, seeing as how i'm a huge ff fan.and i must say it's actually good.and i think thats the problem with alot of these reviews.i think ppl want to see this game fail, out of some sense of being betrayed by SE offerings this gen, or because they over rated 13 now they get to make it up with 13-2.ppl 13-2 is a solid offering and i don't regret pay...
"Eventually MS will realize that the quality of the games is what sells systems, not marketing strategies and corporate baby-sitting".
in the good ol'us.of a marketing is almost more important to sells then actual content.if it's marketed all over the place then it must be good, right?