Why do PS3 fans, similar to the representatives of Sony, always like to exaggerate? HS and Warhawk are on demo in the gameshops, I've seen them, I've played them, and there's absolutely nothing exceptional about them that can't be "found anywhere else".
You do realise that your Heavenly Sword and Warhawk are scoring worse or at least no better than Kameo, PGR3 and PDZ launch titles for 360? I don't think any Xbox fans really jerked off to those scores the same way you guys are. But then again, we're not that desperate for good games.
I guess you just decided to turn a blind eye to the fact that this nigger happens also to be the world's best golfer by track record and not public opinion. The same way you turn a blind eye to the undisputed fact of 360 being the best gaming console. “Queer”, “nigger”, “xbot” - when will all this mindless hating and discrimination end?
Ah, a prime example of the qualities that you'll find in a Sony fan - bigotry and ignorance. Ironically, he must not know that PS3 is made by Sony, a company with its roots in Asia, and headed by a queer.
Warhawk is decent. Bring out the champagne and caviar already.
No wait is worse than Delaystation. Wii got AAA Zelda much earlier remember?
There's no issue of overshadowing. 6 hours of HS, move on to 6 hours of Lair, move on to Warhawk.
This shouldn't be PS3 news.
Animations look to be good, environments are mostly good, but character modeling looks a bit off. Gameplay appears to be on the positive side, but honestly, the game would be better off with the formulaic female protagonist than that rather insipid looking male character.
What does PSM3 stand for btw?
I'll have to ask you to kindly stop posting from now on 'cos I'm desperately trying to kick the habit of mousing over your avatar.
6 is a really pathetic score even for a harsh reviewer.
Some games inherently require multiplayer to be complete, some games not. On this note, how do you propose that this story driven Bioshock implement multiplayer?
That particular reviewer from Gamespot who reviewed Bioshock is tough on reviews. He's also the one who gave Zelda a 8.8 (I agree with him on that though), although he did give Gears of War a 9.6
It is obvious that Square is going back to Nintendo both on Wii and DS. Lower production costs, bigger consumer base and possible enhanced gameplay - why not?
What's there to be jealous about a 7 game? The reason we comment on your games is because you guys couldn't shut the hell up about how every UNRELEASED Sony game would be better than every proven good MS game that has been released. Forgive us if we find it irresistable to laugh at your faces now, but some of you Sony guys really asked for it.
What they did with the blu-ray storage was misuse it for facial expression captures, excessive cut scenes and 10g of audio. Like the review says, style over substance. Look at the short short demo and ask yourself whether that kind of unexceptional gameplay required such a big download.
Where's Mart? I told you guys so too. You can easily see from the gameplay videos that games like HS, Lair and Warhawk weren't going to be much, but of course we were all haters for saying so. And IGN's crap or paid by MS eh?
Answer you?
http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News...
Man I'm soooo sorry, I think he wasn't referring to his little daughter but his 83 year old grandfather-in-law. Or something.
Bear in mind that when you say that there are "30 similar games that sucks" on 360, you're really saying that there are 30 such games that sucks more on PS3, or are you also going to deny that PS3 versions of multiplatform games are inferior to 360?