All Channels
Popular

venom06

Member
CRank: 5Score: 51820

this will more than likely be the best military FPS out this year 2013 (as MW4 will more than likely use that same 8yr engine, still not have dedicated servers and cant do a REAL future setting)...... sadly, the CoD fanboy site IGN has already started their campaign to downtalk BF4 and promote anything and everything CoD related. Disgusting CoD fanboy site.... And it's ABSOLUTELY pathetic how these same stupid "journalist" were foaming at the mouth and creamin in their pants ove...

4816d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

if the new CoD doesn't have a NEW ENGINE AND DEDICATED SERVERS, it will be a slap in the face to us as gamers and consumers, with Activision saying "it doesn't matter what crap we give them, they will still buy it"....

4817d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

and meanwhile, back on the CoD ranch, the're STILL using a 8yr old engine, and STILL don't have dedicated servers and STILL have terrible lag compensation.... HAHAHAHA!!!

4818d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

WHAT A STUPID P.O.S ARTICLE... so um, yeah, Battlefield is trying to be CoD with drivable vehicle, destructible environments, BRAND NEW ENGINE, dedicated servers... GTFO with this lame article..

4819d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

and yet another example of a STUPID reviewer trying to come up with the only negative they can mention about BF4, saying "its not bringing anything new gameplay-wise"..... If you haven't played more than 17min of th SP or even touched the MP, then you really dont know what its bringing gameplaywise. All you can comment on is how it looks and how the short story that was shown makes you feel....

This is the same type of hypocritical, double-standard having, Co...

4820d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

while Battlefield has everything CoD has, close quarters fast paced maps/types (Close Quarter DLC) TDM on Canals and the Railroad Map, you can still have the big battles if you want it... Battlefield is definitely the more COMPLETE franchise.... and that's not even mentioning when they get 60fps @ 720P on console...

4820d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

they did the same thing for BF3 and it was awesome... love the CoDies in here crying about this little insigficant bit of "news".. see all of you on BF4

4820d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

yeah... CoD has really good graphics... (sarcasm detected).. the fact of the matter is, we as CoD fans should DEMAND a new engine and DEDICATED SERVERS WITH OUR WALLETS!! period... if we don't, and we allow Activation to laugh all the way to the bank yet again, then we dont have anyone to blame but our own sheepish selves...

4820d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

yeah... scripted events like what's in CoD that get "glowing reviews" year after year despite being the same crap as the one before it and not that much different from Battlefield... stupid hypocritical people ... When CoD does it, is glorious and awe-inspiring, but when BF does it, its a bad thing??? GTFO..

Even if they "step their game up", the hypocrtical, double standard having CoD fanboy reviewers will still find something wrong...

4821d ago 3 agree5 disagreeView comment

Battlefield is gonna slap CoD in the mouth AGAIN for another year... maybe not in sales, but more than likely in quality.

I'm just dying to see these hypocritical "game journalist" try to justify the "greatness" of the next CoD if it uses the same engine from 6yr ago and doesn't have dedicated servers...

4821d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

doesnt really matter.... BF4, with a TOTALLY new beautiful engine has set a HIGH bar for visual quality and SP gameplay. If CoD will be using an engine from 6yr ago and no dedicated servers, and expect people to not have a SERIOUS problem with that, they are out of their minds...

4821d ago 7 agree3 disagreeView comment

what a STUPID article! there isn't any backlash at all.. this poor kid is crying for views..

4821d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

actually the is a GREAT article giving a very promising look at the BF4 from what they saw..

4821d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

ABSOLUTELY STUPID how these same dumb idiots were slobbering at the mouth over MW3 when it was first shown and released, but when BF4 releases a new and polished engine, then its "the same old thing"... GTFO hypocrite fanboys.. READ THIS AS PROOF

http://www.ign.com/articles...

4822d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

the gameplay was beautiful and explosive... and the things that gives CoD 9s every year (except for the beautiful part).... this was stunning.. cant wait for BF4..

4822d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

now lets think about this for a minute... if this SAME campaign, with all the explosions, high intensity action, was shown, but using a 6yr old engine and had CoD in the title, this would be the best thing since unicorns and apple pie... the reviewers are really starting to show their hypocrital colors...

TAKE NOTE: this will be the CoD fanboy reviewer phrase going forward with BF4, which they used this same thing with MoHWF, "its more of the same"..... but when...

4822d ago 8 agree0 disagreeView comment

a GREAT preview write up for BF4 .... great read for a sure to be great game...

4822d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wow... how the f#*$# can you say no innovation from a damn 17min video... Haven't even played the damn game or the multiplayer portion... God these people are so stupid.. the game looked great..

4822d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

who gives a f#$*$ gamer nerds are so stupid.. the game is gorgeous and will be epic once again..

4822d ago 16 agree6 disagreeView comment

GOOD LORD THIS GAME IS BEAUTIFUL.. CoD get prepared to get slapped in the mouth yet again using your 6 yr old engine.. maybe not in sales, but definitely in quality..

4822d ago 9 agree3 disagreeView comment