seriously, WHY the hell would are people talking about preordering something they have seen NO graphics of or NO gameplay??? kinda dumb... Activision will be laughing all the way to the bank yet again..
Battlefield 4 will more than likely be the better game (BF has been better since BC2), but sadly, CoD has the fanboy reviewers @ IGN, KOTAKU, etc all locked down... they gave an EXTREMELY COPY AND PASTE MW3 a 9, so you know a CoD with a even the slightest changes will be 9 or better..... They've already tried to downtalk BF4 without know ANYTHING about it (except a short 17min trailer that didnt show gameplay) or the multiplayer gameplay. So yeah, as everyone already knows this will happ...
its gonna be so funny when it's revealed that the "next gen engine" this is supposed to be running on is nothing more than another Quake engine update... wake up people, next gen engines will be crap on current gen systems.. that includes BF4.. how many idiots will be 2 versions of the same game???
and PLEASE dont think that super realistic engine that Activision showed will be in any CoD game... CoD is built on slapstick, mickey mouse, cartoonish gameplay.. ...
poor CoD fanboys....remember this IS Infinity Ward and the last "awesome" billion dollar game was pretty much copy and paste crap. You think this is gonna be different just because of a name change???? and the fact that this "new engine" is more than likely nothing more than just another old-a$$ Quake engine update is pretty much false advertising. Think for a second.... how is this "new next gen engine" supposed to work on the 360 or PS3??? it wont...the ha...
totally agreed... ever since that copy and paste garbage MW3 got a 9 from IGN, and they proceed to post ANY AND EVERY CoD related article (no matter how small and useless it is), its pretty obvious these reviewers have their own agendas.. Hell, they've already started to play their hand in the BF vs CoD discussion and are trying to downtalk BF without knowing anything about how the game plays.... nothing worst then a fanboy reviewer pretending to be objective..
its gonna be HILARIOUS when the CoD nerd fanboys on N4G find out this really isn't true and it's not a TRUE new engine, but another "updated" version of the Quake engine....
so as they do every year, the first trailer is going to be released around the time of the NBA finals... people will see it, realize it isn't that from MW3 since IW is making it, but still get aboard the hype train anyway....only to have that same train crash and burn 4 months after release because of lag comp, lack of dedicated servers and OP silenced SMG with laser sights.. again.. THE CoD CYCLE...
seriously... WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE????? both are made by Infinity Ward.. both are more than likely going to be very similiar to MW3 (which most CoD players hate, and the fanboy reviewers @ IGN loved).... so i ask again, what's the difference??
sadly though, CoD has many fanboys reviewers at major sites like IGN, KOTAKU, etc. So no matter how garbage the game is (that horrible P.O.S. MW3 is the perfect example of this), any CoD game will get a 9 score NO MATTER HOW BAD IT IS... at this point, CoD for those sites are more than just a game, but a revenue generating method that's too big to fail.
Ever since Bad Company 2, the Battlefield series has ALWAYS BEEN BETTER and more complete in everyway to CoD. Battlefi...
funny how Activision gets away with putting out basically the same game every year maybe with a few new bells and whistles... No dedicated servers, no new enginer and the same STUPID lag compensation is a slap in the face to game consumers...
who even cares at this point??? No dedicated servers, no new engine, insane lag compensation = another wasted $60/whining and complaining within 5months...
and what sense does it make to be set "in the future", but use "modern weapons"??? that about as stupid as being set in modern times and using WW2 weapons. What's the point IW? Just to say, "ooh look, we doing something different with CoD.. its in the future".... doesn't make m...
dont count on this... this will be shot down pretty quickly..
poor CoD fanboys are getting antsy because IW and the bunch of other dev are tryin to throw something together to sell this year but are slow to talk about it. NO DOUBT, they'll quickly throw something together, but have no fear, whatever is thrown together with insane Lag Compensation and no dedicated servers will still get a 9 from the fanboys @ IGN.. (i.e MW3)
who cares... he was a CoD fanboy anyway.. CoD could do no wrong in his eyes.. even with garbage Lag Compensation and no dedicated servers..
when the "copy and past job" that was MW3 can get a 9 from that fanboy site IGN and sell millions, but be regarded as one the WORST CoD games ever created by actual gamers, and then IGN turns around and tries to downtalk what is potentially BF4, without even know anything about it's changes.... that's when the phenonmenon that's "fanboy journalism" raises its ugly head.. and sadly, that monster is out the box and cant be put back in..
They already did.. It's called BF2142 and BF1943 and BF Vietnam. Next story, nothing to see here, but I bet this is going to make its way that CoD focused site IGN just because its trying to be critical of DICE and the BF franchise.
Commander mode is an ancient old relic that had its time back in 2006, but will be criticized highly when the game is released by the CoD fanboyistic reviewers as IGN, KOTAKU etc. DICE should leave this feature out for the sake of the reviews just because people want the freedom to "PFTO how that want to" ... and will not want someone "telling" or instructing them what to do. That's why CoD is so popular. It gives people the opportunity to run around and PTFO the way ...
wayy to much fanboyism in the video game market and wayy too much money being made from website views for any true objective reviewers to be present in the video game industry. When a exact copy and paste version of MW2 was released in the form of MW3 (just with a few new bells and whistles) and still got a 9.... yet IGN is already trying to down talk BF4 with comments of "not innovative, same old shooter" despite BF4 actually having new elements AND an upgraded engine, this is an ...
of course it is... NO OTHER FRANCHISE has the fanboy biased backing of EVERY SINGLE GAMING "REVIEW" SITE THAT CoD HAS... period.. IGN, KOTAKU, GAMESPOT, EUROGAMER all of them will never let CoD fail.. because that game is too important to their views from a financial standpoint.... especially IGN.. that fact that they gave the copy and paste job MW3 a 9 is a testiment of this. No other game franchise is "too big to fail" for review sites the way CoD is and for that reaso...
as long as they have that site IGN with all the reviewers that are pathetic CoD fanboys giving it 9 no matter how garbage it is, it will ALWAYS be the highest selling game around..... BF4 is in a no win situation..