People REALLY REALLY need to chill and see what this "new engine" is all about and see if its really even a new engine at all.....dont get suckered into the CoD media-IGN-hype machine.... if it just another "cod engine upgrade", how much of a fail would that be??
damn.. another USELESS IGN video about CoD.. they suck on CoD hard for those views, wow..
another stupid, pointless, "I HATE EA" driven article... nothing to see here, move along..
wow... such stupid first commments.. cant wait for BF4!!
nerd gamers are so stupid.. EA isn't any different from Activision... both are money grubbers lookin to get money from nerd games anyway they can.. please chill will the stupid, useless EA hating.. many GREAT games are made under the EA banner.... one of which is BF3..
of couse people are getting burned out on CoD.. been this way for a long time.... .. but when you have the ultimate CoD fanboy site IGN promoting it everyday with any and every piece of useless infomration, or marketing ype, it'll never go away.....
wow.. SO TIRED OF THESE STUPID A#$ ARTICLES REACHING FOR VIEWS... lets just put this to rest now.. Battlefield = better quality, more depth of experience, better overall game.... CoD = will always get more sales, more big game sites promote it.. the end... can we move on now..
still better than Activision..
and the stupid fanboy haterism for a game they nothing about starts in 3...2...1... Imagine beautiful Star Wars on Next Gen Frostbite..... oh the beautiful potential.. Congrats DICE and other great studios..
wow... what a stupid a#$ article... these clowns haven't even seen ANYTHING about the graphics or gameplay from the new modern shooter from IW (and YES its ANOTHER modern shooter, using modern guns), but are already tryin to use the word "stomp"?? what a lame method for huntin for views..
kinda off topic, but a VERY valid question, here.. WHY DON'T PEOPLE DEMAND A BETA FOR CoD TITLES???? especially one that's "supposed to be new". Why are gamers so sheepish and drink whatever kool-aid Activision throws at them. Games like Battlefield atleast give gamers a beta to see if they like the game or like the feel.. CoD NEVER has a beta, yet sheeple buy it, only to complain like madmen 4 months after launch... and they want us to buy the "supposedly new game&qu...
that just it... you cant say they cant be taken seriously when they affect the market as much as they do.. classic point... the copy and paste game MW3 got a 9 from the very CoD focused, friendly and fanboy reviewer filled site IGN.... yet most of the gamers that play that game agree it's one of the worse CoD games ever...and every military FPS that doesn't have "CoD" in the title has fallen victim to IGN's blantant fanboyism and double standard.
Sadly,...
so why the HELL DO CoD GAMES NOT HAVE A BETA????
i love all these stupid article trying to "explain CoD despite the negative comments about it" .... there's a reason why theres so many negative about.. that's what needs to be written about... maybe then, a CoD game thats actually good, that wont have people raging 5 months after release can actually be made..
of course its too big to fail.... and that why CoD fanboy reviewer sites like IGN WILL NEVER LET IT FAIL..... it makes too much money for them (through views), it makes too much money for youtubers associated with IGN (through views), and now that Activision bought the IPL (IGN pro-league), that's even more reason why the biased CoD site known as IGN will never let it fail.. the fact that they gave that copy and paste crap MW3 a 9 only means that any CoD with only the smallest change wi...
i love all these stupid fools crying about Battlefield, when it run circles around anything CoD has done since BC2.. and then to fool these nerds with some marketing fluff talk, then have you thinking this "Ghosts" is not a modern shooter because its "set in the future, but use modern weapons".. thats just a clever way to make ANOTHER modern shooter.. change the name (make nerds think its something different) and wait on IGN to hype the hell of out and get over on sheeple ...
i LOVE the CoD fanboy nerds (especially disgusting IGN) foamin at the mouth about CoD "new engine" and NOBODY knows what this "new engine" is gonna look like or play like.... so if CoDs "new engine" doesn't look realistic, would that be considered a fail?
it an everyday MODERN SHOOTER... screw the fact that its "set in the future".. how stupid is it, that you're set in the future, but use modern weapons??? at the end of the day, basically it's just another "modern shooter", basically MW4
hilarious that is take 3 studios to make one game.. CONGRATS to DICE for doing a remarkable since BC1 with only one... cant wait for BF4..
GRAPHICS DONT MEAN SH#$!!! good gameplay, no lag compensation, dedicated servers or go home!! and plus "Hardcore Battlefield fans" had this same reaction when BF4 was shown... this means nothing..