It can get extremely competitive and fun if you have friends over. I'm not sure if it'd be as good online though.
They already have filled a roster. They have tons of IP's to draw from. Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Sly Cooper, Fat Princess, GOW, MGS, Ico, Killzone, Twisted Metal, etc. Lots more too. Sony just needs to make it different enough from SSB.
It's been proven many times before on PC that just because it's free doesn't mean people will play it. If the mechanics are poor or unfair, people won't stick around for long.
You're going to go on about Sony copying Nintendo when MS isn't even creative enough to create a new IP? When was the last good original IP that MS came out with? It's been years. They have Halo, GOW, Forza, and Fable. That's about it. They rely heavily on 3rd party content and just create sequels to the few IP's they have.
And this is coming from a person with both Xbox and PS3.
They used to have a studio that was good at making fighting games. It was called Rare and they made Killer Instinct. I'm pretty sure MS has all but given up on Rare, though.
How can you even disagree with my statement? Everything I've said is fact. It's not an opinion.
Companies can say one thing and do another. FACT
We won't know the truth until it happens. FACT
Please explain how what I've said is false?
It's not that hard to pick up when it's free...unless you're referring to just not having enough time to play it. That, I can understand.
Just because they say it, doesn't mean it'll be true.
We'll just have to wait and see if they know what they're doing with regards to pay-to-win.
Sorry. Wasn't impressed. I'm not sure it's the engine or the tech demo but it didn't look anywhere near the level that would make me think it's fake. Hell, Star Wars 1313 looked better. The Samaritan demo looked way better too.
Have to agree. I wasn't impressed with this video. I'm not sure if it's the engine or just the demo that they put together, but this one did little for me.
I saw better looking games at E3. Star Wars 1313 looked WAY better than this demo. I'm not saying whether SW1313 will be any fun but it sure looked amazing.
Maybe new for COD but not new for games. I remember Splinter Cell doing something like this years ago. There have been lots of games that have done this. It really doesn't change all that much, IMO.
Boy, that's never been done before.
/sarcasm
Way too much for tech that's barely better than Xbox and PS3.
Why do I get the feeling that all the people that are defending 3D are the people that were early adopters of it?
I hate to say it but 3D is not going to take off until it can be done without glasses, be seen from any angle without said glasses, has WAY more content that supports it correctly and costs the same as a regular TV. Even then, I'm not sure it will sell. Too many people just don't like it.
The tech that Sony should be trying to sell is UH...
I don't really care who won but if you look at just the big three and their exclusive games that everyone wants, I have to go with Sony.
Sony just has SO many quality exclusives. The fact that they can do a Smash Brothers type game with all their exclusive characters just shows how many good exclusive games they have.
If MS were to make a SB type game, who would be in it? You'd have a couple people from Halo and GOW, maybe someone from Fable, but ...
I'm not sure many people consider 2D games to be a premier hardcore game. 2D games are what you expect from the Arcade store for around $10-15. I'm sure the Nintendo fans will love it but to attract others, you're going to need more than a game people expect from Live Arcade or PSN.
Meh.
Pretty weak IMO. I don't really consider a 2D Mario game a true Mario game for supposed next gen hardware. I don't care one bit about Pikmin. Many of the other hardcore games will have already been out on the other consoles for a good while. ZombieU might be the only game on the list that interests me.
Was going to say the same thing. They might as well do that so PS4 has something big at launch.
From what I can tell, you have no indication of how many kills each player has in the round until the time is up. I think that's a major mistake. That takes out all the suspense. If you can see that two or more players are tied in kills and time is about up, that makes the battle intensity skyrocket at the end as the tied players all try and step it up to pull off the victory.
As it stands now, you have no clue so people just kind of let the time go down and wait and s...