CHILD OF EDEN!
"Yea, but I still think its unfair for the 360 to be $250 considering the value you get for $300 with the PS3."
unfair? really?
"Also, does Rare have a legal/PR department? Being a Microsoft subsidiary, wouldn't Microsoft be handling all of that?"
I feel like this probably had a lot to do with it. I think people really under-estimate the bureaucracy behind large corporations. There's also very little chance that M$ would have let them shoot a documentary that M$ didn't have final cut approval on if M$ didn't just flat out take over the documentary.
The articl...
How is that in any way different from move?
The tron wiimote was sweet.
5 pin and 12 pin?????????????
And it's not quite the same because you don't have to pay $5 every time you want to play monopoly after you buy it.
Nintendo has some sweet games coming up.
Last FM is free. It's pretty much just like pandora.
A DLC pack going through the fall of reach would be pretty sweet tbh.
if you're going to call people out, at least get it right.
"not only does the blu ray disc store more data, but it also transfers a larger amount of data. so while a dvd transfers faster it transfers less."
this makes no sense. Transfer rates refer to data/time. A faster data transfer rate is greater in every way than a slower data rate. They are constantly piping data. It's not like Blu-Ray sends data in 5mb clumps every 5 seconds and DVD s...
agreed and bubbles.
Anyone who disagrees has an enormous misunderstanding of how optical media works.
that's right. Subjectivity means it's winning.
MS still has halo. It just doesn't have bungie. MS is making new halo titles at 343 industries.
The new Cryengine 2 does benefit tremendously on the PC side too. Saw a demo of it at GDC. very awesome stuff.
What does it matter if it's live action or not? It had just as much gameplay as the Killzone 3 teaser.
It's an announcement teaser. What were you expecting? A lot of announcement teasers don't even have action, it's some guy giving a monologue in the background before it eventually shows some logo that lets you know what the game is.
The reason is in the article. They wanted to see what they could do when they're confined to specific hardware with first party publisher support.
Obviously whoever they'd do it for (Sony, M$, Nintendo, Someone else) would pay them for it, it only makes sense for someone of their caliber.
@"it was OVER 9 THOUSAAAAND!"
I was going to say the same thing :(
The most important thing he mentions is that it will bring in more money letting developers and publishers invest in riskier games like they could before the recession.
I can't wait to see what happens when more creative development starts picking up again on a wider scale. Even if it makes a bunch of bad games, those bad games could have awesome concepts that could be perfected by more skilled studios.
Dollar train definitely hasn't left, it just has more stops now.
Having a new platform to release on won't mean the products won't sell. Many casual products have relatively simple tech, which is easy to make cross platform compared to major engines like iDtech or custom engines.
Where it might take Naughty Dog a year to port a game (just an example, aware they are exclusive) because it's more hardware dependent, casual developers have a much ...
how would that be proving them wrong? Just because they do it doesn't mean it's not challenging.
Or did you not read the quotes?