Not a single intelligent comment on this entire page. It is all just pure fanboyism (Sony's biggest asset apparently).
lets start by saying; if the PC is a 100, the Xbox360 is a 40 and the PS3 is a 41. Despite my slight exaggeration, it is about time that PS3 owners recognize that they are comparing a BMW with BMW that has a CD player (pardon my metaphor). In fact, If any of you took the time to understand the hardware differences fully, you would realize that both the 3...
Alot of you are just ironically supporting my post. There is no need to get butt hurt. Im just saying, it ridiculous that nearly 100% of you can watch such a poor display of gameplay and sit around praising it.
It isn't my job to design games, and we both know that any counter-example of "good gameplay" that i give wil be TORN APART with out any consideration, the same way this video is being praised without any real consideration.
I have been on both sid...
I think alot of you have turned this game into a false idol.
Weather you like this game because you are a "PS3 FAN", a "Uncharted FAN" or simply a "360 hater". I think alot of you have been blinded by your faith.
I recently purchased a PS3. and now own both consoles, so i would like to think that my perspective is at least somewhat unbiased.
When i watch this video, i see Drake running through a long, long, long train. Doing...
Couldn't have said it better myself.
- In Shadowrun the PC gamers didn't PWN the 360 gamers too bad. Cross-console would be sick. But i'm still reluctant about a online portion of the game.
I was going to give Uncharted 2 and the PS3 props, considering the original Uncharted IS the best looking game on the PS3, and the second one will look even better. However you all decided to turn this into a "Xbox 360 fails" forum, without even being provoked.
I see several comments from PS3 fanboys saying "HAHA xbox 360 cant do this, blah blah blah" and "anyone who says the Xbox 360 is the better console is so stupid, LOLZ". This is pathetic consi...
yeah, typical coming from 360 fanatics!
Sales are not important, because if they were, then the PS3 would be losing! we cannot consider SALES!
Imean its not like Guerilla is trying to SELL this game, its not like good games SELL well or anything! the PS3 wasnt created to be SOLD either! DUH sauce!
-what a stupid comment.
You mean i WONT BE ABLE to play a game with 255 other people! on my 360! wtf am i gonna DO?!. Great, the cell can render 256 character models all at the same time. Isn't it about time SONY stopped trying to reinforce their decision to include a CELL processor, and start making decent games? KZ2 multiplayer sucks bad enough with 32 players, "TURRET LIMIT". "SPAWNING ON TOP OF ENEMIES". Its funny how they mention the CELL processor is capable of doing this, yet they dont men...
Your right, statements of fact are moronic. Congratulations on ignoring my post. I would expected a stupid person to have at least criticized my reasoning. I wonder what that makes you?
So why exactly am i a moron? Considering i wasnt responding to your POST, exactly which POINT of yours am i proving. Furthermore how am i proving it?
Are you telling me that MS developers SHOULD have developed a better looking game in under 2 months?
Are you saying the ...
HUH?, no its just when every SINGLE post in the forum says "if the 360 can run KZ2 why hasnt it?", it gets a little frustrating. It came out 2 months ago, i wouldnt expect a 360 response that fast.
Plus i dont even wear panties, and if i did they would INDEED be wet. I would have wet myself laughing when someone had mentioned KZ2 as a "good looking game". You all need to roll Uncharted.
the f5 key what?
I didnt post it, my post was from a different article.I disagree with bobbysaget posting it here, but i will defend it against your ad hominem.
My implication that Blu-ray is not the next logical step in media storage is based on two things. Even after beating HD-DVD, Blu-ray is doing incredibly bad in the market. Unlike VHS to DVD it isnt a logical step forward. Most people can hardly see, or dont care for the small visual improvment, nor do they care for Blu-ray live (or w.e it...
Bobby bumped my post so i suppose i will defend it.
To Mike134nl "seriously some people don't have a live", you spelled "LIFE" wrong. I'm sure we can all see the irony in that.
To Dark_Overlord, you named one multiplatform game that looks good on the PS3. I was under the impression that even PS3 fanboys were able to point out the common flaws i brought up. When i said "every" mutliplatform game looked better on the 360, what i meant was MOST ...
First things first, the game is being developed on the PC. This mere fact would suggest that the 360 version will look better, as it has nearly an identical architecture to the computer. Similarly the fact that EVERY multi-platform games has looked better on the 360 also attests to this. (to whomever brought up Mirrors Edge, i would say Mirrors Edge is one of the most IDENTICAL multi-plat games to date. The PS3 version simply has better looking 'hands'.
Second, what people fail t...
Your all fanboys, this forum is full of fanboy post after fanboy post. The article is not very in depth, but the conclusions it comes to are very logical. Any person whom was not trying to reassure their purchase of PS3 would most likely come to the same conclusions.
it is still too expensive. There are hundreds of thousands of people right now who would gladly accept a job making 4$ an hour. Those who still have jobs have lost all job security. Most of you are probably kids 12-...
it is incredibly likely that the 360 version will have higher FPS and higher texture resolution. This is a trend that has continued through nearly every multi-platform title. But when this happens, the PS3boys will have several, if not thousands of excuses WHY this is the case.
They will try to claim that even though the 360 version looks better that the PS3 version has "better lighting" and that Square Enix is full of a bunch of MS fanboys. They will tell us that MS pr...
The roadrunner is not using the cell, its using MUCH MUCH MUCH more powerful processor that has a similar architecture to the cell. As stated, this supports the fact that the CELL excels at specific calculations but is not for gaming, as the roadrunner is not a gaming computer. If the 360's fan was its only useful part, then it wouldnt be outselling the PS3 would it? Im sorry you used all your allowance to buy your PS3 but pretending you know what you're talking about isnt going to compensate...
/ban 4 year olds from forum. I have never heard something so stupid in my entire life. the Cell as one single core processor and 7 spu's. The Spu's can only tackle specific tasks which would mean IF THE CELL was being used to render grahpics, the Single 3.2ghz core, and single thread of the Logic processor would have to do 95% of all graphics rendering. You think a single-cored, single-threaded processor could render graphics BETTER than a 8800?. LMFAO, why do you think consoles and computer...
You literally just did EXACTLY what i was claiming you would do. Thats so pathetic its not even funny. You just listed exclusives THAT ARENT ON THE 360 AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE COMPARED. Good job. And no the Cell is not used for gaming which is WHY it is not being released nor mass produced for gaming anywhere else BESIDES the PS3. Likewise thats why its being used now in several new medical technologies.
Multi-core/multi-threaded Processors on the other hand ARE for gaming. Thus ...
Ya this is impossible considering all of you SONY-FANBOYS pre-conceived notion that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360. There is a REASON computers (which blow the PS3, and 360 out of the water) Continue to use Mutli-core, mutli-threaded processrors. While CELL technology has only made headway in the Medical industry. It is NOT a gaming processor. Its SPU's are capable of very little. At their best they can create better looking Material physics and other small-yet-flashy things. The 360 b...
Sony's first console came out seven years before the xbox. Thats just a stupid comment. By typical standards your claim just reinforces that Microsoft is an incredible success. Hardly any other company that was introduced THAT late to its respective market has such a high share of the market. So if you didnt make the connection, that means Sony has LOST a huge portion of their market. While Microsoft's share has continued to steadily increase. Nintendo is an entirely different animal, as you ...
Now on to the article at hand. Obviously "King of the gaming business" is a very arbitrary title. There are so many factors to consider and its equally easy to argue in either direction. However, It is safe to say that Microsoft stole the show.
Microsoft: Xbox 1 sucked, Xbox 360 was broken. Despite the FAIL that was the XBOX, and the 360's 1/3rd failure rate, Microsoft has still managed to steal nearly half of Sony's market share and maintain a 3million wor...