the 360 had a 12 to 15 month headstart
use your brain....
if they supported the 360/ps3 from day 1 and still made all thoose rubbish JRPGs they would have been in a better financial situation no matter what
if konami cant be asked to do it cant they let another studio do it while they oversee there results?
same can be said for hack and slash games
i can mash the attack buttons but if i dont aim my self in the correct position im gonna be hitting air, also, blocking, dodging, changing you tactics VS a boss also plays a role
same can be said for FPS
i didnt read the article (looks like i dodged obvious flamebait)
but this stood out:
It has proved to be probably the biggest loss maker in the history of video gaming.
i wanna see how much the RRoD and various hardware failures have cost microsoft before i beleive this dude
atleast sony invested in the future and could potentially make a proofit, you risk nothing you gain nothing
microsoft is just wasting money on endless repairs an...
crackdown inspired GTA even though GTA came out long before crackdown
and guess what? open world games exsisted before crackdown too
so did guns, cops....im sensing a pattern
its a valve game so a medium end PC will do
neither will the next halo or the next gears
but i bet they will all still be great games
hardcore? what are you talking about? AAA? you got that right
system seller? why does it need to move consoles? cant it just be a good game?
masterpiece of a game? two for two, shame about the rest
people keep saying its fake/its real but you no what?
it doesn't matter either way, it made you laugh/cringe/talk about it
whether its real or not thats the only outcome
1. activision have more to lose then sony if they drop support, this is just an empty threat
2. we are only half way through the year and sony has plenty of time to drop the price, their not stupid, they are waiting for the right moment
3. third parties are only looking out for themselfs, cheaper PS3=more people able to by activisions games, but lets just forget sony is not ready to do this
other trade shows exist for a reason other then to show games
TGS is a good enough venue to show a price cut + GT5 release date
gore is nice but who the hell wants it more then actual in game improvements? its not like we no how much less anyway
i have both infamous and prototype
i played and finished infamous twice, where as i couldnt even be bothered to get half way through prototype
even if thats true (i havnt seen any confirmation by anyone with credit)
are we forgetting E74 and rare/random failures? disk drive, video card
im really not trying to sound like a fanboy but these problems still exist
that just shows how much sh!t/unknowns activision pump out
i have no interest in MW2 so the only thing that caught my eye was Marvel: Ultimate Alliance 2, just my opinion
wont Activision lose money if they dont release there games on PS3?
no matter how i think about it thats the only thing they gain from doing this, losing money
maybe both?
sorry but i dont wanna see a GOW kart, a GOW RTS, GOW golf etc
this game is running through a series, why spoil it with needless new gameplay when it doesnt need it
funny you were no where to be seen when halo 1-3 showed up or the endless WW2 games came fludding in?
just accept that all games are repetitive in some way and move on
or maybe i've got this all wrong and your just a jelous fanboy
the xbox crowd no what they like and its halo, with a pinch of halo on the side and for dessert? moar halo
@Chicken Chaser
mass effect isnt even on the list so is that also an automatic fail in your book?