Yea,it seems like the more disagrees you get the better your posts are...it seems to me like these guys work at Sony or something...the way they defend it,saying ps3 is future...next gen starts when we say so...i mean its starting to look pathetic,i have no beef with people liking system of their choice,but some of them act like ps3 brings the food in their home...
*waiting for disagree fest*
As far as i remember GOW III was called GOW II HD,and GOW 2.5 when was shown on e3,and look where it came,bungie still has months to polish the game,dont worry it will look great ;)
Oh ok...so MS should make generic shooter like MAG just so they prove that 360 can have 256 players on one map?You are a bit naive,like you need anymore shooters on 360.Not only that but i have been playing WOW on my PC in 2004 with 512 mb of ram and ati 9800pro and measly p4 2 ghz and yet game had ENORMOUS number of players on screen and huge environments,as you can tell its all about dedicated servers ;)
I will take myself out of this thread when you answer me what it takes to make a game with 60 or 256 players on one map?Is it dedicated servers or same old cpu?As soon as you give me your answer i will leave this thread(in which as a matter of a fact i said Sonys devs are competing with themselves).
Completely true,just take of RE2,MAG and HR and it really is true...
Mate,you are wrong.Its going to be on the consoles...here take a look,ps3 and 360 frame time with real time GI
http://www.crytek.com/filea...
i have been telling people Crytek has something special in store for everybody :)
I go in various threads,give praise for every good game but you guys are a bit arrogant because you are free to go into any sort of news and basically bash anything that is not from console of your choice.See here he said 360 version would have to be cut down and all of you lol and say yea of course bla bla,but how do you conclude that?Proof is in the puding?LOL that is immature argument,its so fkin obvious that every ps3 exclusive has its own engine,coupled with amazing edge tools sure it gi...
LOL really good one...on the topic,GOW III looks mind blowing and i dont see a reason why they wouldnt be able to do it on 360,sure MS money knows no barriers.And no poly count,textures and framerate would not been cut down,AFAIK 360 pushes polygons and textures equally to ps3,if not better.You guys are certainly mixing pre rendered cutscenes with actual gameplay,because cutscenes indeed could be mistaken with cgi but gameplay,HELL NO,if you think that you need a reality check.
Civilization...V...:P
Its always nice when your main competitor worries about you,MS must be pleased :)
Im not saying anything bad,it would be bad if they said its in game but its actually cgi.They didnt say so,they were honest and said that is pre rendered using in game assets,but it shouldnt be confused with realtime because its simply not ;)
Mate i really really enjoyed this GOW III video,i just think that alot of people here dont realize that alot of those super epic titans falling from cliff is actually pre rendered,but dont mistake it,i absolutely loved what i just saw ;)
BTW,Crytek has something special up in their sleeve,believe me,they are just like Santa Monica.They wont release game that absolutely blows people away,and with talent and technology they got its stupid to be septic.
I have to say game looks absolutely amazing,and while i not wish to hate i think you guys are having orgasm on actual pre rendered cut scenes,because look at for example gameplay at 7:35 and compare it to 2:59,you will see that you are actually amazed by pre rendered cut scenes rather then gameplay(which to be honest looks incredible and is definitely on top with UC2 and KZ2 on consoles).
damn this sucks...oh its for japan,well i think they will love it,when art comes to mind they are quite different :)
You know what?They should really find some ambitious and good programmers because all this overhauling engine this and that ends up in great looking game,but not really.You know what i mean?Halo and Fable both have "overhauled" last gen engines,thats just doesent cut it.MS should really show that 360 has some serious punch that developers simply aint using,but Crytek will,im sure of that :)
They better hire some great coders because Bungie,while great are not quite ambitious as far as graphics goes.
LOL im shouldnt even reply those kind of childish fanboy troll attempts.You sir are hater,yes i mean attacking me and calling me greeneyes just cus i said UC2 looks better then GOW III,which in fact does to alot of people.You guys were bragging yesterday about UC2 graphics and now are cumming because GOW III looks epic,its starting to look pathetic.Like every new ps3 exclusive has to outdo former,pff...
As for Alan Wake,im not holding on to anything,dont mistake me for yours ali...
No buddy you are wrong,please tell me where did i stat that,i think it goes like this.Even though i know for the fact that 360 can do more then it actually shows,but this is my,completely unbiased opinion ;)
UC2>>GOW III>AW
LOL thats like 300$,yea right like somebody will pay that money for that piece of sh***. -.-
LOL at disagrees from people who didnt even read presentation.First of you are wrong in comparing gtx280 to consoles gpus,because consoles are closed box,you can do much more with them then with same hardware on pc,in this case 7800gtx.Did you even read this article i gave you?page 29,it says results of global illumination on consoles,and they get under 33ms rendering whole scene.
They try it on gtx280 but that definitely doesent mean it cant be done on consoles,i dont gat why ...