Well, you fanboys always said that if it's on PC, it's not exclusive. And you all apparently have gaming PCs, so what's the issue here? Besides, if MS cuts PS5 support out, that's fine, PS5 will not have a significant market share for years, so not much money lost. But I'm sure you'll be ok, just play these games on your powerful PC, lad.
1976d ago 13 agree11 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Treat this as a life lesson. You blind fanboys have been shilling for one corporation for years, now another corporation is making a big move and there is a slim change you'll realize how much brand loyalty is worth. This is how you learn that Sony - just like any other corporation - will never love you back and you are fools to act like they would.
On the other hand I firmly believe some of you are just being paid to spam the #Sony_can_do_no_wrong agenda. Business is b...
1976d ago 10 agree13 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Technically yes, you can imagine an edge case where XSS holds a game back. For example, an Xbox exclusive on a tight budget and a small dev team that could make the game a little prettier if they didn't have to spend time optimizing it for XSS. As for the entire generation, though... nope, not really. Most games (both Xbox and PS) will land on PC and will have to be optimized for lower-spec machines anyway. XSS is above current PC min. requirements, so it's not holding anything back. ...
Well, fanboys like you try harder, judging by the number of comments you've made. I just hope you're paid for this, doing it for free would be quite sad.
1981d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView commentInappropriate
@Imalwaysright: Not only is it BS, it's a desperate piece of BS. I mean, what kind of justification is this? "Uh, well in 2005 someone left a mean comment here, so we've been shilling for Sony since then to make things right".
1983d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Yes, you can start saying how much better Sony's offer will be.
1989d ago 14 agree15 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Sure, sure, 100 million people bought their PS4s for The Last Guardian and Golf. It's true and you know it - top10 PS4 games are almost 100% 3rd person action with the same add-on mix'n'match.
Hopefully. This gen was mostly 3rd person action games with (semi) open world, crafting/xp and stealth. This is why i skipped Tsushima, I really don't need more Assassin's Creed in my life.
Breaking news: Sony fanboys not impressed with Gamepass!
2006d ago 11 agree25 disagreeView commentInappropriate
According to the only semi-objective metrics, yes, they are. Which means that making more AC clones like GoTsu is pointless, there is a tired old series in place that does the same thing, only better.
This. Was. Horrible. How clueless are they at MS? Almost no gameplay, no new AAA heavy-hitters, fvkin' Tetris?! Have some mercy...
"We know about the memes. We know about 'Halo, Forza, Gears'. This time it's different! This time it's Halo. And a Forza teaser. And no Gears. That's what you wanted, right?"
Dream list? Easy: dozens of new AAA IPs that innovate, look great, play great and kick ass in general. No sequels, no remakes, no reboots, no kinda-new-games-that-pretty-mu ch-just-copy-other-successful-t itles, no more copy-paste "third-person action games with some stealth, shooting, RPG elements and collectibles". Blow my mind.
Technically yes, you can imagine an edge case where XSS holds a game back. For example, an Xbox exclusive on a tight budget and a small dev team that could make the game a little prettier if they didn't have to spend time optimizing it for XSS. As for the entire generation, though... nope, not really. Most games (both Xbox and PS) will land on PC and will have to be optimized for lower-spec machines anyway. XSS is above current PC min. requirements, so it's not holding anything back. ...
Yes, you can start saying how much better Sony's offer will be.
Sure, sure, 100 million people bought their PS4s for The Last Guardian and Golf. It's true and you know it - top10 PS4 games are almost 100% 3rd person action with the same add-on mix'n'match.
Hopefully. This gen was mostly 3rd person action games with (semi) open world, crafting/xp and stealth. This is why i skipped Tsushima, I really don't need more Assassin's Creed in my life.
According to the only semi-objective metrics, yes, they are. Which means that making more AC clones like GoTsu is pointless, there is a tired old series in place that does the same thing, only better.
Not really better, though. Several AC games are rated higher.
This. Was. Horrible. How clueless are they at MS? Almost no gameplay, no new AAA heavy-hitters, fvkin' Tetris?! Have some mercy...
"We know about the memes. We know about 'Halo, Forza, Gears'. This time it's different! This time it's Halo. And a Forza teaser. And no Gears. That's what you wanted, right?"
Dream list? Easy: dozens of new AAA IPs that innovate, look great, play great and kick ass in general. No sequels, no remakes, no reboots, no kinda-new-games-that-pretty-mu ch-just-copy-other-successful-t itles, no more copy-paste "third-person action games with some stealth, shooting, RPG elements and collectibles". Blow my mind.
No, no, the reviews are already written, don't you know how it works?
Oh, yes, please.
So... just a couple?
Assassin's Creed Japan scoring the same as Origins and Odyssey. Makes sense.