If you don't think any of the Battlefield games are great you either
A) Only play consoles games, and therefore your opinion doesn't matter.
B) Have an underdeveloped Medulla Oblongata, and therefore your opinion doesn't matter.
C) Think CoD is the best Multiplayer experience ever, and therefore, your opinion doesn't matter.
Call of Doody, FTL.
Alpha build. As many have posted, they're not testing graphics, and don't even have compatible drivers running. This was to test the actual MP gameplay.
Yay! Time for Bozebo to upgrade his dual core.
Inefficient programming my ass!
Yeah, that screenshot looks really stupid to me. Just tells me I haven't missed much by skipping the first two.
Or maybe because it's not worth it to keep servers online for a 5 year old console-only game that nobody (Ok maybe 50 or 60 people) is playing.
You're upset that you can't play Battlefield 2: Modern Combat? You know there's dozens of better games to be playing?
Or are you mad anout the BF 2142 demo? Really? Anybody who's still playing the demo at this point has gotten more than their money's worth. If they want to play more 2142, ...
This article should never have been written. Obviously it's too complex for the denizens of N4G to comprehend.
What Caleb said. Do you people really think BF3 is launching with one map? I mean the Karkand maps will be released like a month after the game's debut. Hell the title even say confirmed "so far".
Damn, can nobody f-ing read anymore?
This article is obviously too complex for mouth breathers to comprehend. Please don't buy BF3, and if you do, buy the console version, I don't want any of you on my team, that's for sure.
C'mon Moparful, nobody wants to hear your life story, staying up all night playing NES. Good for you.
This article is about why PC's kick consoles asses all over the place, and i's not even about specs, controls or graphics (though those are 3 more great reasons), it's about user made content, PC games that have been completely overhauled into new experiences. Sure the examples they provide are mostly cosmetic, but that just scratches the surface.
...
"PC don't even have any good exclusive games so why even bother they have multiplatform games with better graphics BIG DEAL. "
Well, you totally missed the point. I'm sure it's something you're totally used to, and completely unaware of.
Exclusives? Not that it's even relevant, as I don't care that I can play something you can't, or vice-versa. It's the gaming experience that matters to real gamers, not some badge ...
@ Winter47th. Grow up, there's nothing wrong with modding PC games. Speaking of tools, you are one.
Yup, agree 100%. I am so looking forward to BF3, all these changes should make for an unrivaled multiplayer gaming experience.
That's an easy one. Don't use the exploit, and play the game as intended. Want God mode? Use the exploit. Definitely not something that should be high on their list of fixes.
Got the PC version a couple weeks back on D2D for $12.50. Love it even more than the first, and really glad to hear this patch is on the way, but even so, I can't say I've encountered any bugs yet.
Maybe they're referring to the only relevant version of BF3, the PC version.
Kind of depends on how much they actually need to move to counter the reflection. If all they need to do is move slightly, like a foot or something, and then resume camping, I really don't see it being much of a factor.
peeps who worry about campers are peeps who would appreciate some help arming the goddamn M-COM! How about capturing a control point once in a while, or throwing a motion mine?
There is little need for "snipers" in BF, what we need are recons who actually care about helping the teaM.
Hell yes. After playing Crysis 2, I had to go back and play Crysis to compare, and found Crysis to be the superior game by a wide margin. Gameplay was better, graphics were better, story was better. Crysis was a lot of fun then, and now that I can max it out, it's even better.
I'd love to see Crysis on X-box, it would be hilarious to see side by side comparisons. Console fanboys would be beside themselves when they realized just how weak their consoles really are....
I agree with Majors, because he said performance AND value. AMD processors are well known to have a better price to performance ratio.
Yes, Intel has the fastest CPU, but they charge twice as much for performance gains that are 25% or less (not really smoking).
Between Zambezi and Bulldozer, Intel is going to have some pretty stiff competition. If they can keep the prices lower too, they may surpass Intel in performance AND quality.
Yes, this bogus, misleadingly titled article was posted by a true rod.