I assume they mean numbered titles only, but even then...15 was fully action combat as far as im concerned.
I will never believe and or trust a director (or whatever he was) that says his game is way better than what people thought it was. It's arrogant and childish. He acts like everyone thought the game was trash and had a political agenda with their reviews (some of them did, but the do that for every game) and now tries to justify the "lower" metacritic score that it's not because the game wasn't good enough.
another uninformed comment, it was taken down because it was published too early.
@Sirk7x it transforms it into a game where you spam quen and dodge, that's it. Blocking doesn't do enough to offset the increase in damage the monsters do and neither do the stats of gearsets.
modern forum reply moment, didn't read article still gives his uninformed opinion on it
Mirror's Edge was such a breath of fresh air. I had never even played anything remotely close to that game and I really loved the clean visual style they went for. I would actually love to see a remake of that game and see what they can do with the visuals.
Ico, Death Stranding, Mirror's Edge....just to name a few.
@revan how is it free when you have to pay for it? I do think a certain bar of games needs to be met, but I also think a lot of people are overreacting. Not every month they will put games in that each individual will enjoy.
?? you realize bethesda wasn't owned by MS at that time..... right buddy?
Also this game was helped to bring to life cause of Sony so you should maybe criticize them instead of MS for this.
hes one of those subhumans that when he disagrees he needs to kick someone/something else down to make him feel good about himself.
This might only be true for the older gen of gamers who actually grew up in a world where you got complete games. A lot of newer gamers dont know better and for them having a boatload of mtx is how it has always been.
Let the Cuphead developers make a (black and white) Mickey Mouse game.
Why would i wanna last out at (this) reviewer? For the most part he says the game is great. You lash out at a reviewer with a completely unrelated topic while not even having played the game. You already made up your mind without experiencing the game itself, this guy actually has something to base his opinion on besides blind loyalty.
It's sad and childish you think that everyone who doesnt blindly hands out perfect scores to Sony first party games must be bought by mi...
are you a child that cant stand someone not 100% agreeing with your opinion?
3 final fantas games actually.
i dont really care about how much the mtx will cost in D4 since i dont care that much about cosmetics, but i am worried that they will just put all the cool looking pieces in the store instead of earnable in game like they did with wow for the most part
god damn Amazon shills
then they shouldnt have made 2 seperate games. People will judge the saga as a whole but also both games seperately.
Sure he can want that, but its common practice to compare a sequel to its predecessor. It's done for every game and just because he asks nicely doesnt mean the game will be immune to criticism if it turns out to not live up to the 2018 version.
ngl im a bit skeptical with all the statements that have come out recently. First it was sequels dont always need to be better or smthn and now this. Im sure the game will be great but there has been some weird things said.
so those games still get updated? As much as I disagree with Genshin winning this "award", your comment makes absolutely 0 sense.