You could say that about pretty much every 9+ game in the last 10 years.
"fast paced killing people, not bots"
A vital part of my quote there, regarding your comment. There is nothing more dissatisfying than killing bots with the same AI as Duke Nukem Forever.
I also never said the game wouldn't run smoothly, I was rectifying a reason COD is successful, it will always be the same quick matches, Titanfall isn't that, so the audience may not adapt and move with it. That's the point.
I played the alpha and beta for over 40 hours, and have given extensive impressions good and bad on reddit. I'm exaggerating a little on the titan kill perhaps, but the game just is far from the be all end all of fun.
Get off the bandwagon, eh?
Probably not, at the moment no matter how 'bad' a CoD game is, it's bound to run smoothly and be fun to play as always. Where Titanfall fails here, is it's inconsistent fun, the over abundance of titans and bots on a map which will put off those wanting fast paced killing people, not bots and spending 30 rockets to down a titan. That's why CoD is successful in the first place, look at BF4, still riddled with bugs and unplayable at times.
She wasn't really involved with the Jak series.
It wouldn't have been amazing, due to the game not actually being amazing.
I assume these are print screens from the overly compressed Youtube trailer?
How heavily compressed are those? Penguin looks really bad.
Better stealth, less restrictions, a good story. Do that, and you can do whatever else you want to it.
Someone has intelligence problems, I'll leave it at that.
Peace.
@Hellsvacancy
Your Government didn't decide shit, do some research.
Your point regarding watching the entire game on YouTube is incredibly ignorant and thick also, 5 minutes of cutscenes =/= 30 hour game. Think before you speak, ingrate.
Laughing at your edit.
Get over it.
You're spending extra with the additional import taxes, because you want to see 3 scenes of anal probing and abortion easily obtained on the internet? And we're passing blame to the UK government regardless of the fact it was Ubisofts decision?
Fuck me this website.
@snake9182
Yeah, it'll happen eventually, sales were good and the general reception was great.
I agree mostly, being overly excited about the first since before it was even well known I was left disappointed. A lot they can do with it though, intrigued.
OT: When such a website provides no source, it's bs.
Hopefully they address the issues with 1
Had more fun with the side missions than half of the main story line missions, nevertheless had a good time playing it. Yeah, it has some hiccups with AI and the likes but it's pretty solid (on PS4) to my experience.
Stretch out into Gotham, follow up with Azrael and Hush from City and you have my intrigue.
I was excited for Dishonoured during early developer videos, but ultimately thought it fell flat of what it set out to achieve. Boring story, lack lustre stealth set in a good looking intriguing world with great art.
Bioware ruined DA2.
By that reasoning, would you praise EA if DA3 is stellar? Most likely not.
Possibly due to it being available on 160 million last gen systems, as opposed to 10 million current. That's about the only reasonable answer, it's likely just a downgrade, but we'll have to wait and see.