All Channels
Popular

Leord

Contributor
CRank: 16Score: 143590

It's a *fitting* name indeed...

I'm just wondering how it's even possible to make a reference to Gary Glitter in a game review....

6487d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'll second that notion =)

6487d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Oh, no he didn't! =D hahaha.

Edit:
And despite demands to play the game, I find no traces of him doing so :)

6487d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think it's interesting how IncGamers' stuff get so "hot" on N4G without being much "news". Quality perhaps ;)

6487d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I've seen some gameplay from the game. Not sure if I'm gonna buy it... I'm not a big fan of piracy per se, but perhaps trying the game out is good before purchase... =P

6487d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think the games look wicked so far. Oleg Yavorsky of PR, is he involved in development too?

6487d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Aw, I love Jeff Hollis. *clicking to read*

6488d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah, that would be my guess as well. Perhaps less time between beta start and release though, so a beta after Christmas... Hopefully earlier release as well...

6489d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, I still think Q3 is pessimistic. Ofc, it all depends on the Zerg and Protoss Single Player game. I think Battle.net 2.0 has a separate dev team. I think I heard them talking like that, Jay Wilson that is. Perhaps he reffered to StarCraft 2 team, who knows, but I bet a beta is quicker than you say.

TheCHUNK seems quite on spot. Beta at or after Christmas, and release in the summer/spring.

It's hard to know as Blizz obviously did a lot of polishing before showing...

6489d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

And woho! I just got my 7th bubble from someone kind! Thanks you a lot =D

6489d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, as the article say, this is no big surprise, and Blizzard COULD probably postpone the release to 2010 just to mess with Activision, but I think this sounds pretty solid, especially considering the source.

6489d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well, having said that, Blizzard also promised Battle.net updates and map packs for multiplayer campaign etc. It didn't make the article, but there will probably be plenty of material to download. Well, the difference is of course that it would be voluntary downloads....

6489d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think the "Battle.net 2.0" is a machination of PC games reporters tbh.

6489d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Actually, the article almost isn't any speculating at all. These are the things that Blizzard have SAID will be in there. =D

6489d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm just wondering if this will include StarCraft, WarCraft II and Diablo II.

6489d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I like wrap-ups. They allow me to avoid reading so much news in the work hours ^^

6493d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Jeez. That's harsh.

I'm not buying that game!

6493d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ooh, the second installation of "Lee Tharjick" =D

Yeah, not for kids! It's really refreshing to see some "bashing" of stupid games, without actually be so seriously condescending. =)

6494d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Haha, love industry drama =D

6494d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Hehe, I'm wondering what business avenues they are yet to fill with WoW merchandise =)

Starting to get a little intimidated by the commercialism =P

6494d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment