Tekken 4 and 5 blow Tekken 3 totally out of the water, and anything before that is just a joke. I agree that all the great fighting series need to start innovating a bit more rather than just doing the same thing with better graphics and a few new characters, but to say that the series should have died with the PS1 is just plain ignorant.
That said, if Tekken 6 doesn't have online play by now, it's a coaster.
Really, it's like April Fools 9 months early. What the hell are they thinking? And I thought Ganryu was a joke character no one wanted to use...
Then don't see the Halo movie.
FYI, I never directly said that Halo series' plot sucks outright, I just said that the story and cinematic presentation was campy and over-the-top. When I said "(even IF the plot sucks)" that was referring to the movie specifically, and the fact that by virtue of being a videogame movie the odds are highly against it having a good plot.
Learn some reading comprehension and grab yourself a tissue, fanboy.
It's all subjective. If you think you can call people idiots for not being as impressed by your favorite stuff as you are, as if its quality is a factual matter, then you're the idiot.
A demo we will see the survivors a perimeter around create.
Seriously.
All this controversy over media formats is getting pretty absurd. One week, someone posts an article by some jack-off analyst with some BS reason why he "knows" Blu-ray will win "teh warz!!1" and a few days later, someone's posting an article by some jack-off analyst with some BS reason why he knows HD-DVD will win.
It gets to the point where the fanboys on this site are just posting these pointless "prediction" articles simply for the sake of post...
tplarkin7 , that's exactly what I told him in the comments for the 1up Metroid review ( http://n4g.com/NewsCom-6291... Whining because a game got a 9 instead of a 10 is bad enough, but quibbling over fifths and tenths of a point when you haven't even played the god damn game is ridiculous.
Way too many people here seem to think that looking at screenshots and videos online before a game comes out makes yo...
Let's hope that Smash Bros uses Havok better than Dawn of Mana did.
You're complaining because they gave the game a 9 rather than 10? Get over it, it's still a highly favorable score, and who are you to dictate what scores a game should get over people who have actually PLAYED THE FREAKING GAME. I swear, way too many people here seem to think that looking at screenshots and videos online before a game comes out makes you an authority on the game's quality. Neither graphics nor brand name equate automatically to gameplay quality. Get it through your head.
I like the U2 reference in the description. Achtung Baby was a great album.
Would you rather read more inane 'console war' news?
"omg MS/Sony did your mom last night! click to read the full article!"
Some who doesn't find MS vs Sony fanboy warmongering propaganda newsworthy? My GOD! They must be plastered!!
LOL, "omg they finished the game a month early why don't they release it now!!!!"
What, did you think Bungie was actually going to work on it right till the day before the game comes out? You don't press thousands or millions of discs overnight...finishing a game well before the release date is normal.
We'll see. It's not like UT3 is going to give people what they're looking for anyway; it's too fast for console gamers and they'll give up after a week because they can't handle the speed. Like a lot of games these days, people are only hyped up about it because of the graphics and the system its coming to first.
LOL, maybe the reason they didn't include UTIII and some of those other games is because the poll was asking what you think should be "game of the year". UT3 and most of the other shooters aren't coming out till 2008.
I've seen the gameplay videos many times in fact, I wrote a feature on it.
http://deeko.com/readfeatur...
There is nothing interesting to see, just typical FPS run-n-gun antics...they don't even show off the cover mechanic. Good gameplay is not just about having good graphics during the gameplay (as opposed to the cutscenes), it's about having in-depth combat.
"Were they on drugs or something? BioShock and Warhawk both getting 8 (While it should be 10 and 8) and Heavenly Sword and Stuntman both getting 6 (while it should be 9 and 6)(IMO)."
Are you on drugs or something? I won't comment on Bioshock since it's already out and you might have played it, but how the hell can you attempt to correct someone on their review score for say, Heavenly Sword, when the game is not out yet and you haven't even played it!!??
...
It's a cliche, but haven't any of you heard of gameplay > graphics? It's truly amazing how much hype this game is getting, simply because it looks good.
These guys give us an entire article devoted to gameplay impressions, and the article still spends half the time talking about graphical effects.
When it comes to gameplay, Killzone 2 has shown us ZERO that makes it stand out as an above-average game. There were only 2 gameplay features described in this previ...
When I play Bioshock I'll see if I agree with any of these points. It certainly looks like a good game on paper, but even games that get 9's and 10's in mainstream reviews can be flawed. I do have to say a few of these complaints do seem rather petty and irrelevant though.