If you mean the picture of the purple guy with the girls... thats a genie, not an orc.
Only Orc's i spotted in the art are a bunch of severed orc heads.
Um, 360 had plenty of new ip's...
Gears of war, Crackdown, Alan Wake, Kameo, 99 Nights, Shadow complex, Lost Odyssey, blue dragon.
So the 360 did not just have sequels..
So basically it would be a good idea to keep relying on the existing franchises, instead of expanding?
I dont see why that would be a good thing...
We might have flying cars by 2015, you never know :P
You said yourself that x1 fans need to accept that on paper the [ps4 outclasses it.....
20% is nothing.
That translated to 5fps more.
The difference between an entire class (for example I5 vs I7) is more then a 150%.
Logical, as an I7 is easily twice as expensive.
Wont happen, how many exclusives where actually able to run 30fps Full hd on the ps3? not too many, 99% of them where 30 fps and 720p.
Same with 360 games, they where 720p and 30 fps, both consoles could not do better.
Actually, Sony fans need to accept that on paper the ps4 doesnt outclass it at all.
The ps4 stays slightly ahead at best.
An I7 outclasses and I5, but both the Ps4 and the X1 are I5's, in terms of performance.
With the Ps4 being an I5 with a higher clock, but theres not way that the Ps4 performs an entire class higher.
I would like to see it rest too, its redicilous that people bicker about specs when it comes to consoles.
At best it means your bragging that yours is one nanometer bigger, considering that if you wanna brag about specs, you better be ready to spend a 2000 euro minumum on those bragging rights.
They already match, theres a 5% difference between the two at best.
There will even be situations at which the X1 may perform better, such as AI and physics heavy situations.
Some people act like comparing the X1 to the ps4, is like comparing an I5 to an I7, which is over stretched.
Both the X1 and Ps4 are of the same class, theres has never been a generation before with two competitors releasing hardware with such similar specs.
But when Naughty Dog says Sony is good to work with, you obviously eat it up.
But when Crytek, Playground, Ruffian, Mistwalker, Epic or other 3rd party devs say something good, its the money talking, right.
GOTY, gimme a break, the ps3 title with the most awards is Journey, nice product, but hardly a game.
Personally i think Final fantasy is an artistic mess.
Its technically very beautifull, but the looks lack hierarchy and are very unaesthetic, and therefore unpleasant to look at.
I long for the designs of the old days, they where way more in place with the settings and the atmosphere.
True, it did.
Yeah but its not a first person shooter.
And bioshock got its non linear aspect from western rpg's.
For games to become cheaper, there would have to be alternate sources of income.
Movies for example have the theater, tv income, disc version sales and what more.
Games however...
H0w strange to mention Myst..
Myst is a point and click adventure from first person perspective, not an FPS.
But for the rest is agree.
Well, i agree with him on Kinect1.
And that is what he seems to be talking about.
Well, doh? the previous one was Sub HD, so i am not sure if GTAV will even archieve 720P.
It looks more like the first three Residents to me, then the fourth one.
Which is excellent!
Even tho i am getting the Ps3 version, do remember that the 360 version of GTA4 looked better (higher res, less popins, more foliage) then the ps3 version.
I hope they get both versions run the same this time around.
Also, the size of the map is not an issue, its the area thats rendered that can make an issue, and as far as i can tell, thats similar to GTA4, so theres no reason why GTAV should freeze or lag.