I find this hilarious. If you'd like to CTRL+F that piece for the words "sony" and "playstation," you'll find ONE instance of EACH word in a piece that's over 900 words long. That means that even if you take and combine them versus the rest of the piece, you're still calling him a fanboy for 1/450 of the article's word count.
But let me provide context, since it's the only time this article mentioned anything on PlayStation:
3296d ago 9 agree3 disagreeView commentInappropriate
People think they are because the Nintendo President himself said they were considering it.
The combat is as shallow as can be though. All you have to do is hit the enemy's weakness - which the game will tell you after hitting it with one of each attack - and watch the damage roll in as the session attacks play themselves out. The variety of moves available don't matter much, because you just need one of each type of attack, the specific sword ability you choose doesn't matter much in the end as long as you have a sword ability. The way you play isn't altered by the ...
People think they are because the Nintendo President himself said they were considering it.
The combat is as shallow as can be though. All you have to do is hit the enemy's weakness - which the game will tell you after hitting it with one of each attack - and watch the damage roll in as the session attacks play themselves out. The variety of moves available don't matter much, because you just need one of each type of attack, the specific sword ability you choose doesn't matter much in the end as long as you have a sword ability. The way you play isn't altered by the ...
In what way would you consider it deep? The entire article is examples of how it lacks substance. By all means, share what aspect you think has depth.