First, you didn't say that YOU found it boring, you just said that it was boring.
Second, The last time I replied to you, you were bashing Mass Effect in a different article. So i'd say you're living up to the name.
Third, if you think the characters are boring, then tell me a game that has better one's.
To some of the comment's: How the f*** could you think the characters are boring? Name one game that has a roster of characters that are better.
Living up to the name yet again, I see.
N4G? more like N4BFG.
This part of the map will be a snipe-fest.
Take away the Kinect at that gameplay was pretty dire. Just because its being controlled with Kinect does not make it good.
The AI, the hit model, the gameplay was all last gen.
Does anyone know when this is going to be available to EU PS+ members?
On console, Batman: Arkham Asylum uses it and looks great. Gears 3 will use it, and that looks incredible. Although I do agree that Mass Effect 2 looks average on console, It looks great on pc.
Living up to the name, I see.
I would say that length/content is just as important as gameplay. I wouldn't get a game that's fun, but only 8 hours long with no replay value (at least on launch day). But at the same time, I wouldn't get a 50 hour game that's boring.
I just started playing FFVII a few days ago, and so far i'd say it's better than a lot of games released today, which is really good for a game that's almost 15 years old.
After that awful review that came from Gamespot, I think they should stop talking about Infamous 2.
I just looked at the comments on IGN's Grand Theft Auto IV review on N4G, and I'm reading things like:
"PS3 won the console war because GTAIV is better on the PS3" "the best game the Xbug 3rd60 has ever seen, is better on the PS3. And they got tons of agree's, and very few disagree's.
It's not AS bad now as it was then, but now you get people saying: "Gears of lol 3 is the only exclusive the Xbox fanboys have to look f...
IF I had to decide I would pick MW3 for the campaign and (mostly) spec ops.
But they are both generic, point and shoot military shooters.
So are Tanks.
The only thing I like about Origin, is that it shows the prices based on which country you live in. Steam only shows american prices.
To the people defending the pass here's a question:
Who gets the money made from the pass?
Is it the developer?
Is it going towards server maintenance?
Or is it just more profit for sony, who were already probably going to make millions from R3?
My bet would be the last one.
I played Fallout 3 and before I platinumed it I played it for 36 hours and thought it was good, but when I platinumed it I played it for 126 hours
and thought it was incredible.
So they can extend the play time by making you do things you wouldn't have done without them.
What's with all the sheep defending this crap? it doesn't help you in any way.
This article is at the top of the main page, and half of the comments are filled with haters.