All Channels
Popular

curtis92

Member
CRank: 5Score: 38610

animations and graphics, probably... but it really does take a team that knows WRESTLING to do a proper game.

4498d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's to be seen... honestly titanfall graphically looks the same as Ghosts... but don't forget, the next COD is targeted for Next-gen and will release in november, already putting titanfall to shame in graphics. And besides... if COD adds mechs what's the diff?

4498d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

Yeah it does matter.. this is why we buy new consoles... for better graphics. better graphics = more possibilites with storytelling via gameplay... more immersion. If you're fine with crap graphics why aren't you still on your n64/ps1?

4498d ago 25 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think that's what Destiny is going to be over the next decade

4498d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

What will cars be like in 20 years?

They'll probably have wheels and steering wheels.

4498d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

COD will survive because it's simple... players vs players with guns. No bots.

Halo will survive because MS is going to milk it for everything they can and MS fanboys will eat it all up.

Destiny will be hyuge.

Titanfall will do very well sales wise. Nothing compared to what itll do when it's multiplat though.

4498d ago 4 agree6 disagreeView comment

new is good. While I appreciate what they did with this series over the past decade +, it's time for some new blood, both literally and metaphorically.

4498d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

tends to happen when it's one of the very few glimpses of success a system has in it's future.

4498d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Titanfall would be the “energizer to launch a new generation of gameplay.”

“We’re just getting started,” he said.

dat PR tho

If they're "just getting started" now, then what have they been doing? The bad thing about mindless PR drivel is that it exploits your own failures.

4498d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

So they save their savings for themselves and charge us the same amount... if they cut out the middleman, we should get the discount due to the pain and hassle of dealing with origins and other non-steam software.

4498d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

...so you're saying $85 is... a deal?

4498d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes, PS3 games will be them getting their feet wet with the tech and getting it out in the open. This is the first actual stage of PS5 and beyond we're seeing.

4498d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'd find it more disturbing if he loved the slower, more expensive hardware.

4498d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

“Can Render 1080p at 60fps with Room to Spare;”

*removes 80s filter because it slowed game down. Guessing that wasn't on the PS4 version...

4498d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Guessing XB1 couldn't handle it and to achieve a bit of parity they removed it from all.

PS4 “Can Render 1080p at 60fps with Room to Spare;” According to Kojima.

4498d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

To me this is were PS Now will be huge.. being able to possibly use my ipad as a tv for ps3 games with a DS4 is an incredible concept.

4498d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

helping fund a game doesn't automatically mean you will like everything about it this point forward. In fact, I think helping fund a game gives someone more right to be critical about it than average users.

4499d ago 23 agree0 disagreeView comment

Xbox. Fine Awaits.

4499d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Can someone explain this second screen fad to me? They act like "well on one screen you have to stop a lot to look at your map, etc, but on a second screen you don't have to"

Umm... yeah, you do. Looking down at another screen is far more obtrusive to me than bringing up a map on your TV. It's not effective. It's a gimmick.

4499d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

So indie devs are hipsters? Because they don't work for EA? I... what?

4499d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment