I hope they understand that being as good as CoD 4 isn't enough. Nobody want another game just like CoD 4, they want a game like CoD 4 but only better. There must be more of everything, and for the love of god have a good loby system and support 32 players.
CoD 3 multiplayer sucks too. It as too arcade.
If you want to bash CoD 5 fine, go ahead but leave BF 1942 and the BF series out of it. The BF 1942 didn't do anything for the FPS genre? STFU, you have no clue.
I guess the FPS perspective is a bit too personal and graphic for the singleplayer campaign to be on the Axis's side, but the multiplayer its perfectly ok to be the Nazi and kill another player for the some reason.
Its also ok be the Germans and kill Allies in flightsims and strategy games, in those genres not being able to play the Axis campaigns virtually amount to censorship.
I'm getting 73 FPS average @ native 1080p and 4X AA. LMAO! This game looks sooo much better than the Xbox version, it just looks so damn sharp and smooth. With the 360's controler connected to my PC the demo totally rocks.
Like always, the PC version is boss.
Whats wrong with installing? At least you're watching a great cutscene and it help make the game load faster, a win-win situation.
It is if you buy the digital download
Children of Men game? What is this some kinda joke!?
My list...
1. Saving Private Ryan
2. Gladiator
3. Appleseed
The time for honoring thyself will soon be at an end, highness.
As a gamer I enjoy informative articles about developers and their complexion.
Trying....trying...nope, still don't care. I suppose this is a huge deal for the Scotts, Irish and god's know whats the third country is but the world at large probably couldn't give a rats ass.
I do not mind the streamlined gameplay as long as they add new gameplay concepts in place of what they took out to make the Civ work on the console. It's difficult to judge unless you play the full game, the demo is rather short.
If this is your first Civ game then, yes. Its awesome.
If this is your fifth (after Civ 4 & expansion packs) then its only ok. I do not like the idea of paying for a $60 game with less depth and content than a game that cost $30. I also do not like the idea of dumbing down a game just because it's on the console. When the devs take some gameplay elements out for suitability, they should add new content and depth to make up for it. In this case annoying advisors and leaders ...
Its a complete ripoff!!
No, of course not. For $4.99, are you kidding me? Of course its worth it.
The consoles.
Western devs however dominate on both the PC and the console. The PC is particularly important because it is only gaming platform with global reach. The majority of Asian gamers are PC gamers, with huge numbers in China and Korea where games like Starcraft,Counterstrike/Quake, and WoW are basically national obsessions. There isn't a single Japanese game with that kind of cultural penetration.
So the question the article posed is quite valid. FPS, th...
I find your comments rather ironic considering the pathetic long haired metrosexual emo characters that typically infest Japanese games.
Japanese games are deep? LOL!!
PSP is for teens and adults. Everyone knew that except for this moron. Most gamers wouldn't be caught dead playing a DS.
You're right 120 mhz on some of the Samsung models looks very artificial, because it is. I don't know how the new XBR8 and 7s from Sony will perform though but its a feature that isn't all it's cracked up to be.
The tri-LED backlight should be awesome for colors and image though.
Crysis doesn't have a piracy problem because its hardcore PC FPS with a considerable hardware requirement. Crysis is more of a showroom game to flex your PC's muscle.
CoD 4 on the other hand is much more popular target.