Oooo I'd love to have that one on 360! As long as they do okay controls (better than Age of Empires 2 on PS2)
This game would have been a nice change of pace for consoles to the usual action oriented games, but maybe they didn't make enough from their prevous sims console games?
It also depends on how you qualify flop: game that doesn't live up to expectation or bad game?
It won't be a bad game...but will it live up to expectation? Who knows...for some they will say yes no matter what. Others will be more critical: look at the reception to the last two Halos or Killzones.
I don't think they'll make it until the next round of consoles or they do another engine?
I only care about single player and as long as the single player is better than Gears 2 and closer to Gears 1, then I'm happy. Going underground wasn't as fun.
I don't play wrestling games but I find that games that are simple and easy to learn have more appeal then games that take hours to learn to play. So in this case I think that the developers got it right with making the game nice and easy to learn.
@ newn4gguy
Who says it is better? I don't think 3D is that amazing from what I've tried, and even the 3DS gives headaches..
I don't think of it as next gen at all.
These graphics are amazing. The destructibility of the environment makes the game very close to reality. But is that a good thing...
Well it would certainly be great to avoid the repetitive library area in Halo!!!
Well a lot of games were on PS2 only or Xbox only or PC only, (eg. COD 1) so many people may not have owned those platforms.
It would be good to be able to play a bit of games past and it would be plug and play each time, so wouldn't make you feel like if you were away from it for a long time you have to remember where you were, what the controls were, or whatever.
When I go from shooter to shooter or something like horses in RDR and AC: Bro, I often stuf...
They'd have to polish the games a bit though and maybe upgrade a few things, but compared with making a whole new game it should be easy enough for them and they would make money.
Only thing is getting used to different control schemes each level if they were different games...
Maybe it's because Nintendo has always been a bit 'different' in its approach- there's almost no point in decrying things. Going back to the N64 when they kept cartridges, then the Gamecube with mini-discs, the Wii, not to mention the portables...they aren't like Sony or MS so people expect them to be out of step with the others.
My brother has one, and I'm still going to get one for the next Pokemon. Not really interested in the games for NGP. I'd play those on a console rather than a portable.
And all that is just to get some teaser????
It's sure taken a while to get out...
I would have liked Bioware to impress us with this last DLC before the third game but it is apparent that they did not which is very disappointing.
Why the middle East again?
From what I've seen of the Resident Evil HD screens, they don't look too different to the originals...particularly with the Wii version of RE4. Why not upgrade the graphics more, rather than just fiddle a bit and call it HD?
Making quick money seems to be Capcom's focus atm with RE.
Have heard about the game a lot, but still don't know much about how it plays...
Why in New York again??? Way too many games set there...