with Jade Empire. I played it at least twice, once as a good guy and once as a bad guy. I can say it was one of the more enjoyable games of last gen for me, and I had both consoles. I wish they would make a second one, but I certainly wont hold my breath. If a studio favorite hasn't started development since the last one, then I don't think there is much hope in the near future.
I'm glad somebody is standing behind having color in a game and making fun of those dull gray, brown, and black games. (Bungie does it too, but they get destroyed for their color)
That's exactly what I was going to say. Bubbles for you.
that the two lowest scores are at the top of the page. Nothing really to say, I just find that interesting.
there is no shortage of interesting stories to make games from. I just hope they make the game stories as interesting as the stories from the books. I have hopes that Reach will do just that.
And this is happening just before the events of the first Halo. Hopefully it will go similar to the book and go into how the Spartans were chosen and made into what they are.
I don't know if you're a fanboy or not(judging by your comments here, you aren't), but that's not a way you should lose bubbles so I'll give you one.
I've lost a few because of moron fanboys, so I get what you're saying.
intelligence in the Open Zone is astounding. Bravo guys, you are a step above the rest.
Reach is going to be a full three year cycle game. Just like the first 3 Halo games. And 720p seems like a strong possibility, but 1080p is not likely to happen. (Very few games actually make use of full HD)
Yes Please! I use to play this game for hours back on my old Genesis. If it's legit, I hope they do the game justice.
I'm just saying that you're using some hypothetical scenario that doesn't work well with your argument. The Wii Fit argument, as annoying as it is, makes more sense. That is clearly not a game that is better than anything on the market and it sold better than anything out there.
All-in-all, the sales make a great game argument is ridiculous on both sides. Yes, good games do tend to sell better than bad games, but sales don't equate to anything but profit.
I love Insomniac but just because they release a game every year doesn't mean the dev cycle was only a year. The article is talking about great games that have a defined scope being made in a limited amount of time. Not everything has to be a huge 3-5 year blockbuster or a small download-able game. Games that clearly know what they are and are well defined from the get-go can be made in a short amount of time and still be great games.
And my gripe is not about differing opinions....
is what you would call an outlier. It's so far from what the average score has been that it is considered a fluke and not reliable. (Well, if this were a rational place it would be.)
the Halo story. This is good news for fans of the games and the fans that delve deeper into, what is, one of the better stories. (The game stories aren't the greatest, but the books and everything are amazing.)
Microsoft isn't stupid, despite what most of you think. They will handle Halo with more care than most give them credit for. (Especially with Frankie manning the whole thing.)
doesn't Haze prove that bad games don't sell well? Therefore meaning decent games do tend to sell better than bad ones. Sales do not equal quality all the time, I'm just saying your logic using Haze doesn't work.
if it takes "no skills to make", I suggest you get started making a game like that so you can make millions.
You're very right. They shouldn't be spoiling the story line in a review. It's supposed to be an opinion of the game, not a story reveal.
It's also unfortunate that the first 5 commenters didn't even read what you said. Especially that first guy whose comment is laughably off the mark.
you're getting bent out of shape because some psycho group like the Christian Science people are asking if it's going too far? That's like getting upset because the fat kid at the lunch table just downed a twinkie. You knew it would happen eventually.
And the anti-American comments are quite unnecessary.
a huge reason why every high school should have a mandatory Logic class. lol.
but it's one of the many PS3 games that make me wish i could afford one at this time. More content doesn't mean a better game though. 60 players is too many for a team kind of game. No organization. 8 player co-op is impressive though and would be awesome.
Was Resistance 2 only 1 year cycle? I need proof of that one. That would really be impressive.
And Nuri, the least they could do is make it less obvious that they didn't read it. I think your comment was the only ...
a while back Bungie hinted at working with another big name dev on something. I may be wrong, but I'm 99% sure that's what was said. And Bungie really has proclaimed their love of other games a lot and UC2 has been one of the bigger ones. A ND/Bungie collaboration would be nothing short of amazing. No one can deny that.
It's cool to see developers helping each other out. It really shows the difference between the grown up world and the make believe war on N4G. Time to grow up, m...