All Channels
Popular
Oh hun, such a drama queen.

Valenka

Contributor
CRank: 10Score: 93730

New v. Used :: Benefits and Losses

It's no surprise that purchasing video games whether it be a new, sealed copy or a preowned return, comes with benefits and losses, and it's been prevalent since the beginning of gaming time. To the untrained eye, purchasing new games has its benefits such as included content and everything intact, an undamaged box/disc, and naturally, the fresh smell of unwrapping the plastic sealant. While on the other hand, when purchasing preowned games, you'll get an insert for redeemable content that's most likely already been used, a game box with some wear and tear (depending on how old the game is usually, or if the previous owner mistreated it) and the game tends to smell like whomever owned it before you...and needless to say, whiskey and cigarettes isn't always as pleasant as Lady Gaga describes it.

Over the years, I've experienced first-hand plenty of benefits of purchasing new video games, as well as an equal or mildly lesser amount of such with preowned games. I've gotten lucky with a few preowned games, where the previous owner was negligent enough to not use the included free content and I got to redeem it myself; most recently with Final Fantasy XIII, even though I found myself returning the game a day or two later for something else. All that glitters is not gold, folks. Unfortunately, I have had my fair share of preowned flops. Such include going on the hunt for a rare or underrated game that not many stores carry, only to find that last remaining copy be in an ugly GameStop preowned case, with that little rabbit fellow all over the place. I'm a collector of sorts when it comes to games; I don't like to get rid of any games once I finish them, because I enjoy walking into my bedroom and seeing the massive collection. However, I found that it doesn't hurt to take advantage of GameStop's bonus 50% towards trade-ins promotions; trade in enough games and you'll receive almost enough store credit to buy as many as you traded in, give or take a few.

To share a bit of my wisdom that I learned from that of a fellow gamer for all you preowned gamers out there; it never hurts to buy a preowned game and then contact the company that produced it and tell a little white lie that your in-game code isn't working. I honestly feel like if you take the time to actually purchase the game from a retailer, regardless of whether or not it was a sealed copy or a previously owned copy, you're entitled to whatever content the game is packaged with.

Which brings me to my next point; games that promote purchasing new. I'm not sure how preowned purchases work. Do the companies still get a fraction of what the retailer makes on a preowned purchase, opposed to a new copy? Feel free to comment on this below. Anyway, it would make sense for companies to protest the option of purchasing games preowned, that way they make more money. I will protest this, however, because preowned games are a steal. Sure, you don't get the content that a new version of the game might come with, but think of it as a trial of the game or a rental, if you will. GameStop's policy is quite amazing; as long as you return the game within 7 days of purchase, you can get a full refund and use it toward another game (new or preowned) or just take the money and run.

I'm on the fence about it, to be honest. I like to purchase preowned games when I'm unsure of whether or not I'm going to like the game, that way I can return it. Otherwise, I'm getting the same game for a lower price just because someone owned it before me. Nothing to complain about here. In-game content already redeemed? Like I said, contact the company and tell them the code isn't working.

To go back to the point I failed to cover previously; game companies that promote new game purchases. Why? What's so special about purchasing a new game? Just so the company makes more money? You'd rather us dish out an extra $20 for a game and give up the benefits of purchasing preowned games?

Basically, I find preowned games to be a better deal than new copies. Sure, you get about three different stickers plastered on the bloody box advertising that it's preowned, and you end up needing to soak the thing in lighter fluid, but so what? I find that preowned games is the way to go. Feel free to leave a comment below and let me know your standpoint on the debacle. Also, check out my previous blog about in-game codes to see another prime example of useless promotions for preordering and purchasing a new game.

Dicaxe5196d ago

The thing that gets me about Used Games are the online access codes. I mean, how are you supposed to play, for example, Battlefield 3 Online? To Be Honest, there's not a great chance that the person before you bought Battlefield solely to play the campaign; and if you buy the game with a used code, what are you supposed to do? Also, if you have more than one account, you are not able to play it on both accounts! I had this problem with me and my Brother splitting the Price Tag of BF3 50/50, and it turned out that we could not both play on our separate accounts. Is it two much to ask that two people can play on the same console?

Valenka5196d ago

I agree, it's horribly ridiculous. I don't understand the purpose of online codes. If you purchased the game, you should be entitled to all content that comes with it, regardless if it was purchased new or preowned.

ThreshStar5178d ago

"If you purchased the game, you should be entitled to all content that comes with it, regardless if it was purchased new or preowned."

Most gamers would agree. Major companies I find, however, don't.

A lot of apps on mobile phones cost $1. DLC for maps, characters, weapons, etc could cost anywhere from $1 - $30.

We all know why they do it: So they can get more money from you. If there's no logistical reason a company is doing something, then you can pretty much bet it's to increase their revenue.

PhantomTommy5196d ago

I hate that previous owner smell :)

I live in Ireland where the man with high speed internet is king so I often come across used games with their online codes intact, I still hate the damn things though and as Dicaxe details above, they're not an entirely elegant solution to the problem.

Bladesfist5195d ago (Edited 5195d ago )

No the publishers and developers do not get a cent of the your pre owned purchase. Multiple times publishers have approached retailers and asked "Hey, come on give us a fraction of your sales on our games" and the retailers said no. That is why the customer is going to get screwed over when the publishers cant afford to loose all this money and decide that every game should have a one use code.

I think what these retailers are doing is going to force publishers to cut out retailers and go completley digital in the near future. In the end its the consumer who will pay :/

Valenka5195d ago

Thanks for the information, Bladesfist. It makes sense as to why publishers and developers would be up in arms about preowned games; I guess that's how retailers make their own side profits when it comes to selling preowned games, and why some of their trade-in values are so rubbish.

I still don't agree with the publishers and developers wanting to either go completely digital or do what the rumours are saying, about having the code that once it's used, that copy of the game cannot be used elsewhere. Renting games aren't going to be a possibility any longer and used games are going to vanish. You won't be able to sell any games after you purchase and play them, so consumers are going to be stuck with whatever games they purchase, whether they like it or not.

SilverBullet1295195d ago

Well even if they do go all digital, they can still allow you to rent games like Onlive does for PC players, where you pay a small price depending on how long you would like to rent the game for. The only problem I see with that is that a bunch of ppl have data caps and so downloading huge files is never nice.

That is why I hope a deal is made with Onlive so that Game companies (such as Sony) can also use the Streaming technology for there games too, would really love that feature since then your not downloading much.

In conclusion, I believe Sony and Microsoft can actually make it work well where it doesn't hurt the consumer as long as they do it right.

Bladesfist5195d ago

Well publishers want digital for a whole lot of reasons. Its cheaper, greener, has unlimited shelf space meaning older games are still sold for a very long time, no used games or retailers screwing them over. A whole lot of cuts they can make to their manafacturing side.

The only problems with digital are on the consumers side. Such as bad internet and not being able to resell games. However these are not problems for me with the ammount of digital games on sale. Its going to go digital in the future like the movie and music industry. Its just a matter of when.

70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio60d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing60d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9260d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit60d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing60d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9260d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
40°

Games Done Quick is coming to Europe for the first time with 3 days of Gamescom speedruns

The charity event will be streamed live from Gamescom in August.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
50°

Report: Injustice 3 in Development at NetherRealm Studios

Thanks to the slip-up of an artist working on the title, we now have more evidence that a new Injustice game is in the works.