The first 1/3 of the story reflects on the PS3 but the rest certainly doesn't.

caption,
"Back to Mobile, simple answer easy to develop. The programming codes are many times more than the Wii and its Cheaper. Popular
ARM architecture which powers highly successful 3DS gaming console is also in popular Mobile such as Iphone, Ipad, Android
Hironobu Sakaguchi next JRPG “Terra Battle” for mobile, very probably likely funded from Hironobu Sakaguchi's own pocket.
“Terra Battle” for Mobile, is Cheap to develop, is Easy to Develop, Low risk, High returns.
last generation JRPG was not dead, they simply moved to Nintendo. Will Greatest JRPG of this generation / moved to Mobile / Stay on Nintendo / gain the courage to be dedicated for the PS4?
PS4 utilizes an easy game development environment computer architecture, x86-64. Reflecting PS4 specification, it has more than enough power to play today's mobile games. Terra Battle be made available on Playstation Network could very well happen.
it's a Mobile Game, it must be bad" stigma is waning, Mobile game developer is making progress. Modern Mobile Phone hardware uses very similar ARM cpu architecture as 3DS & Vita. Plus Sony Xpreria Z2 spec is very close to PS Vita.
Is it the low-end Graphics, the Sprite, the Low Poly Character Models, the compressed audio that makes a Mobile Game bad? It's the game world that makes JRPG great(regardless low-end Graphics, the Sprite, the Low Poly Character Models, the compressed audio)."

end caption

DragonKnight wrote,
"I provided proof of that to you, but instead of accepting that as the truth you decided to stick to your original point and make a poorly written blog about why Sakaguchi isn't developing on Playstation consoles."

What proof, this?

http://www.1up.com/news/hir...

"The machine's architecture is tricky, and I don't like Ken Kutaragi." As for why the Father of Final Fantasy isn't a fan of the Father of the PlayStation, we don't know -- he didn't elaborate. But now that one of those reasons is no longer an issue, perhaps his tune towards the PS3 will change over time."

You two were arguing who was right but low and behold you were both right but it was you who refuses to concede that the other was also right. That sounds like you have issues being wrong about things. He said he didn't like the PS3 architecture AND Ken Kutaragi. Guess what Mr. I Am Always Right? Ken left Sony so tell us again about all those games he made after that on the PS3?

If you weren't so attached to the PS3 and get so damn defensive anytime someone brings up its faults you would be able to actually offer a retort. Instead you continue to be condescending to people like you're better than they are. If you've got nothing good to say maybe you shouldn't say anything. I know it's hard for someone like you but maybe give a try for once.

The PS3 was a damn expensive system to make games for at the time and MS likely helped fund his project on the XBox 360. Either way Hironobu Sakaguchi is still trying to find some success and there is a lot of money to be made in mobile, that's why a lot of big name talents have headed in that direction. Plus like the author of this blog pointed out, that you seem to want to ignore while concentrating your efforts instead on attacking him, making games on mobile is cheaper so a lot less risk is involved.

"I would suggest you don't try to comment on interactions you weren't a part of."

Not gonna happen my friend if you bring it here and be disruptive. After all your the one who replied first and only to this blog, nothing in the authors written commentary said anything personal about you.

"I would also suggest you take your bias and.. well..."

My bias? Bias of what exactly? You sure like to deflect a lot.

"Anyway, you're commenting from a position of ignorance and fanboyism. My comment had little to nothing to do with "defending" the PS3 at all, but your comment had everything to do with trying to attack (strong word, but unfortunately most applicable) me and my position on baseless grounds and complete ignorance, as though you had nothing better to do than to insert your irrelevant opinion about me and try and cover it as part of the topic discussion. "

My fanboyism? That makes no sense at all and is just your way of trying to take the attention away from you who we all know suffers from this syndrome immensely. Now tell me how I am ignorant, you still haven't answered anything I said. Your the one who pointed out the flaw of this topic and I showed his answer to why Hironobu Sakaguchi went mobile.

You sure are spending a lot of talk not saying anything on topic.

"I'm wholly uninterested in you or anything you have to say about anything at all. Beyond this initial (and final) response to you, I hope you enjoyed my reply to you because it's simply going to be the last here. I have no interest in your pointless attempts at feuding."

And here we have it yet again. Another cowardly response to something YOU started. You attacked the author, made no effort to discuss ANYTHING, and how now resorted to ignoring my posts with yet another random response that again doesn't answer anything. Bravo! Your condescending nature sure adds so much to this site you seem to not get enough of. Not only do you see yourself as Mr. Right but also a character who loves to go on the offense and absolutely hates being on the receiving end when someone else does it to you.

If you don't like the blog don't comment in it if you can't be on topic. The author did discuss why he went mobile and added information as to what happened prior with the PS3. That was relevant because it started his frustration with consoles. Which you seem to still think is all to do with Ken Kutaragi, which again you cannot admit also related to the hardware of the PS3. I guess that would mean you weren't right about everything and we can't have that now can we?

"I have no interest in your pointless attempts at feuding."

Haha, do you do stand-up too?

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Let me be clear. This is sarcasm