
Spoilers are the enemy. Spoilers are feared. Spoilers rhymes with boilers and boilers can get pretty hot when they're not taken care of... sort of like spoilers.
I just wonder if there is, or ever will be, a solid opinion on when spoilers are okay. One month after release? Three months after release? Six months? A year?
I, personally, don't really care. If a review spoils a few things, I am fine with that as I wouldn't be reading a review if I was that invested in what can or cannot be spoiled. I may be a rare person who doesn't read a single review until after I beat a game, but I'd rather be able to make my own opinion on a game without anyone else's opinion in the back of my head. I just get annoyed when people make such a fuss about being spoiled when most of the time it is their own fault for reading/listening about a game more than the time they spend playing the game (if at all).

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.
Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.
To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

The charity event will be streamed live from Gamescom in August.

Thanks to the slip-up of an artist working on the title, we now have more evidence that a new Injustice game is in the works.
I draw the line when it gives away critical plot line moments, but apart from that I'm pretty cool with most things.
And yes, I hold my hand up when I say if I am spoiled, I blame myself for reading it. I suppose the temptation of knowing more about a game before it is released is sometimes overwhelming.