I'm watching you...

LostDjinn

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 71640

Tribal Marketing and How Keeping You Stupid Pays The Bills

First of all I'd like to welcome you all back to my semi-random blogs about the pathetic nature of current gaming PR. Now if you read my last blog on the matter you'll know to get out now. If not, ignore what I just said. It was great. Best thing you never read. So, as I'm the one writing this I'll start by diving into the chunky end of this particular cesspit.

Tribal Marketing isn't something new. It's been around for quite some time. It's based on polarizing an audience. Put simply it's about instilling a team mentality in consumers. An "Us and them" type thing. It's good points are:

- It generates advocates (fanboys/girls/lobsters)
- Your "team" tends to overlook shortcomings with "team" related products
- It tends to dissuade "team players" from trying competitors products

It's this feeling of belonging that allows or even promotes "advocates" becoming zealots. The crazy, lying, no sense making turd chunks that have plagued gaming for years. The thing is that a quick look at their (the turd chunks) behavior shows that it reflects the marketing used to push the product in question.

Let's take a look at the Tribal Trifecta: Dogmatism, deflection and misrepresentation.

Three underhanded and ultimately empty tools employed by people throughout different spheres of the gaming community. Everybody from manufacturers to advertisers to "journalists" (I know that's not the right word for them but I'll get onto that in a minute) regularly employ them (the tools not the chunks). Why you may ask yourself would they do such a thing? Simple. Money.

Manufacturers need to sell the products they manufacture (otherwise they'd be called unemployed). Different manufacturers have different standards though. I'm sure a quick look through the nets will reveal just how far some are willing to twist things to make their product marketable. I mean some of it is downright insulting and yet there they sit and... you know what? I don't think I need to take this one any further. There's enough of that going on already so lets skip ahead.

Advertisers need to sell a companies product as that's their only revenue stream. The funny thing is that any study into how people react to someones vocation lists advertisers as the lowest (or close to) as far as trustworthiness. I mean it's startling just how little people think of advertisers. The funny this is that even though people know not to trust these slimy ad whores they find themselves buying into the advertising regardless. Why? Because there are many subtle shades of brown in the advertising industry. It's always expanding and evolving new ways to get people to spend. People not interested in your product? Simply impersonate happy customers (AstroTurfing) and spam social media or anywhere else people may be discussing the product you're trying to hawk. They couldn't care less about buyers remorse or credit debt or any other factor. They're there to make the sale. Whatever it takes and given there really are no repercussions (of any consequence) when they overstep the mark why would they act responsibly? Just make that check payable to: Youradumbassconsumerandyou' ;renotgettingyourmoneyback and be grateful we let you buy it in the first place. So now that you've bought the product do you throw it out or join the team? Strange that those seem to be the only choices for some.

Alright, I think I we should move on to the second last bucket of filth that plagues gaming. "Journalists". Now this one gets tricky because you can't paint everyone with the same brush. People are individuals after all and as such I'll say 75% are douchebags (the margin for error here is up to 25%). They're only after page views, kickbacks, free swag, or indeed anything they can get and their integrity is the first thing gone and the last thing on their mind. Just go for a virtual stroll through this very site and behold the levels to which some will stoop. The very stupidity they try to peddle in order to to achieve one thing. Revenue. Some of the methods use reflect the individuals ethical state. Things like:

- When a product does well you'll find sites going to great lengths to find unrelated (an in some cases untrue) news to hit bait anyone they can.
- Endless Vs articles that have no fact in them. It's just an excuse to abuse the tribal system that's been put in place.
- Opinion pieces where bloggers write the most inane and useless waffle that you'd swear that'd taken a blow to the head before beginning.

The list goes on and it's plain for all to see just how pathetic a lot of sites have become. As such I don't think I need to spend anymore time on this point.

So at last to the end and the final problem (Cat I don't want ladies to read the next part so could you cover beans eyes? Thanks) It's you. The rational, free thinking person that attempts an even handed approach. You're f#$kin' it up for the rest of us. People livelihoods are at stake here so get stupid or get out.

I mean the only other course of action is to act like adults and everyone show others (from the top of this industry to the bottom) respect. Yeah exactly! Not damn likely. So find some way to lower your IQ and get in here with the rest of us. ;)

Emilio_Estevez4628d ago

What's a lobster? Is that a term the kids use these days?

LostDjinn4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

"What's a lobster?" http://dictionary.reference...
I just didn't want to discriminate (it does have other meanings though).
Why? What's a lobster where you come from?

Edit: I see. In that case I did it just to mess with you EE. That'll learn you for making me take out the only swear. :P

Emilio_Estevez4628d ago

A lobster is a lobster here as well, but you lumped it in with Fanboy/girl so I thought I might not be hip to some new language.

s45gr324627d ago

I know is a crustacean part of the shrimp family tasty and delicious especially with butter. Now to describe a person as lobster well it beats me, that's my question too?

memots4627d ago (Edited 4627d ago )

in this case lobster means "anything or anyone"

iceman064628d ago

Reminds me a lot of the old divide and conquer idea!!!

Elements of this technique involve:
--creating or encouraging divisions among the subjects to prevent alliances that could challenge the sovereign
--aiding and promoting those who are willing to cooperate with the sovereign
--fostering distrust and enmity between local rulers
--encouraging meaningless expenditures that reduce the capability for political and military spending

This idea has been used in economics, politics, and originally in military imperialism.

thorstein4628d ago

""Journalists". Now this one gets tricky because you can't paint everyone with the same brush. People are individuals after all and as such I'll say 75% are douchebags (the margin for error here is up to 25%)"

You, sir, are a genius. I have been saying this for years. Even blogged about it twice, once trying to help them out by giving them ways to improve. They aren't just d-bags, they are a wagon full of douches, a veritable douchewagon.

LostDjinn4627d ago

"douchewagon" - I like that. It's mine now.

s45gr324627d ago

""Journalists". Now this one gets tricky because you can't paint everyone with the
same brush. People are individuals after all and as such I'll say 75% are douchebags
(the margin for error here is up to 25%)"

Finally we are starting to see how useless those journalists have been. You hit the nail in the head when it came to journalists.

coolbeans4627d ago

"It's you. The rational, free thinking person that attempts an even handed approach. You're f#$kin' it up for the rest of us. People livelihoods are at stake here so get stupid or get out."

http://wcuk.files.wordpress... :P

Rather fun read.

LostDjinn4627d ago

"Rather fun read" - Are you drunk already?

coolbeans4627d ago (Edited 4627d ago )

No, the problem I have is much worse: my fanlobsterism for your work. ^^

LostDjinn4627d ago (Edited 4627d ago )

"the problem I have is much worse: my fanlobsterism for your work" - Okay. Well let me just...

http://24.media.tumblr.com/...

40°

21 Capcom Classics Are Now Free in Your Browser for a Limited Time

All 21 Classic Games are playable for a limited time 🎮

30°
6.2

WiZmans World Re;Try review - ChristCenteredGamer

CCG writes - "WiZmans World Re;Try has some really interesting things going for it, and some cool mechanics and visuals that few other JRPGs do. It is clear some real care and effort went into this game. However, between the sheer amount of inevitable, unavoidable grinding; the lack of depth to most of the combat; the just-okay music and sound effects; and the moral issues that really make me question how this game got away with an E10+ rating, it's difficult for me to recommend. This is definitely a "play with a podcast or Netflix binge-session on in the background" type of game, even if you are in love with the things that make this one stand out. If that's your cup of tea, then WiZman's World Re;Try will provide 35+ hours of it for a relatively reasonable cost."

Read Full Story >>
christcenteredgamer.com
30°
9.6

Saros Review - A Masterpiece in Motion | COGconnected

Saros builds on its predecessor, but can it evolve the formula without losing the intensity that made it compelling?

Read Full Story >>
cogconnected.com