First off, fanboys- vamos. Or in other words, go away. You are not welcome here.
I think it would be unwise to tell you what side of the argument I am on, because I am writing a blog post about how stupid it is, but you're welcome to guess as well as critique every point I make and use it as evidence.
Okay now let's get down to business. Both games are shooters. Big, successful shooters. They're big, successful shooters that are releasing in the same time of year, so yes, people will compare them, right? Well, yes and no. Sure they are shooters but the whole dynamics of the games are totally different. To say that one would be an adequate replacement for the other would be silly.
Let me break that down: Someone says battlefield, I think- tactics and teamwork whereas if someone says call of duty, I think- Running and gunning, mindless killing.
Now that doesn't mean one game hasn't incorporated elements of the other, for example, I've had many 1v1 encounters in battlefield that have just come down to pure speed of aiming and tactics play a very small part in those kinds of fights. And I've played games of call of duty in which I've had much more success working as a team. But yeah, a different kind of gamer plays each game. You know yourself what you'd rather have from a shooter and you know which game you'd rather have without some internet fanboy having their say.
And here's another thing- although different players like different games doesn't mean you can be discriminating against a player for their choice of game. You can't judge someone for buying a game. You can judge someone for being a troll on n4g, but not for which game they've chosen to buy.
I wanted to keep this short... Anyway, I hope you got the idea, don't be hating on your fellow gamers for not agreeing with your taste in games. No one game is better than the other, they all have value to the person who buys it and that's all that matters at the end of the day. I'm not so naive to think this is going to influence anyone's actions but, I'm just putting out what I think of this and just saying that no one is right or wrong.
Terribly sorry if any narrow-minded people think they have a right to try and condition people into buying their game, but you don't.
Go play somewhere else...
Microsoft just shared new details about what's coming for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, and even a few tidbits about MSFS 2020.
Capcom tries something new and absolutely crushes it.
If you love dystopian thrillers, this one's for you.
To be honest you just added to the argument as we will see in the upcoming comments.
I'm not a fanboy of either but If I get one it will be BF3, I enjoyed the multiplayer of the past BF games so Im just gonna stick with the one I know and enjoy, I imagine most people will do the same and pick the one they prefer.
Only fanboys argue, gamers game
Because everyone knows BF3 will win? Yeah I thought so...
haha j/k, seriously though I am of that opinion - even if EA does somehow manage to f**k us all over even more with pre-order exclusives and the like.
I'm sure alot of people feel the same as you.. But unfortunately. You've wasted your time if you were hoping to convince any people to stop. Especially on this website. People will still do it lol. I plan to get BF3. But i NEVER get involved in these debates
Im just going to buy both, They're both good games with their own ups and downs.
Battlefield is a game when i feel like experiencing real war
And
Mw3 is a game when i want to play more of a arcade shooter
Heck i love Fps games and i barley miss any of them this fall alone im buying Halo 1 Remake on Xbox and Gears 3, and Bf3 + Mw3 on Ps3