for all those who say 85% is too much than i would say 65%...maybe i was taking it a bit too far, but you have to admit that there without a doubt more cutscenes than gameplay, and no way did i say this game was awful...and no i did nto rush this game, actually i took my time because since this was my first mgs game i wanted to see what was all the fuss about...but this is all my opinion itjust did not appeal to me, and i think that GTA4 is worthmore playing...flame me all you want, but suppport your decision

Are you new to the Metal Gear series or something? Metal Gear is famous for its extensive and gripping narratives. The gameplay is great but I'll be perfectly honest I fly through the action sequences just so I can get to the next cutscene for more of the plot. Who cares about the gunplay? And I'm really sick and tired of people saying "Oh the AI is ignorant and there is no pop-out-and-shoot mechanic!" Ok for one there is such a menchanic and I'm kinda mad they put it in because I'm a true to form kinda guy, and two with the AI thing the same reasoning holds true. This is a Metal Gear game! And no it isn't the best one. Metal Gear Solid 2 is the best in my eyes.

Oh and to add about GTA4...I haven't accomplished half of that game yet to this day. I burned through MGS4 in 3 days. Which do you think I found more interesting? The one I couldn't leave alone or the one I barely play?

@ crap face

dude me to!!!!!!

finally someone to attempt to clear something up, but i will go on what you said

story: of course story wise mgs4, why? because it is the ending of a long epic tale...gta4 was also good, it had many plot twists and made you go why did he do that? sure it had pointless ideas, but still it was a great story

gameplay: imho, i dont think either game had great game play, yea with snake you get use your OctoCamo suit blend in, have a robot with you, and use night vision, but there are some flaws, drebin made it too easy to obtain guns, snake had slow reloading times, snake couldnt climb over anything that was taller than his knee, and he couldnt sprint (maybe because of his age, idk)....on the other hand gta4 had a cover system, which worked fluidity throughout the game, use of a cell phone, and for the first time, free aiming, and just like before, it had its flaws, driving (of course), small count of weapons, terrible AI, and many others

graphics: of course MGS4 has this hands down, kojima worked on this for too long not to get good in this section, on the other hand, gta4 was also (but not as good as mgs4) a work of beauty, the only thing that i can complain about is the damn character models, the look like mgs3, and that was on the ps2! i believe if R* worked on the models a little longer, it could have been truly a beautiful game

sounds: you have to admit, both games had the sound down packed, cross with a CAPITAL T, in mgs4, you could have snake grunting when he crawled too long, everybody's voice was unique, and the music was just right (i wish we can use our ps3 music for the ipod), in gta4 the guns, the cars, the police, the scripting, everything was perfect, and whats gta without the radio? like i said both games dominated this section

EDIT: i know you cant compare these two games, its like comparing barbies to halo (well i dont now), but the fact is, how can you get mad for a game getting a 10, but then when another game gives out a 10, its like its the greatest thing ever...can someone justify this? im pretty sure those reviews werent rigged, especially ign, but i did notice that they got the first review, and mgs4 was reviewed AFTER it was release, was this because of the kojima restrictions? i dont know i am just a curious guy who wants to know the bottom line

like i said before, i am still leaning towards GTA, maybe because this was my mgs and i should play at least 2 or 3 times, i hope this clears up why i made up this blog..and i thank everyone for the criticism, i love that

Sorry to dissappoint the legions of Sony fanboys here but i agree. GTA4 is miles better than MGS4, simply because i can pass the pad to a mate, my brother or even my GF and they could all have a little bit of fun causing mischeif. This can not be said for MGS4 where you have to watch the extensive cut scenes to really appreciate it and have fun with it.

Its each to his own thought isnt it. the only games i would ever give 10/10 to is HL2, GTA:san andreas and Gears of War, but that's a matter of opinion.

basically, i dont care if GTA4 or MGS4 got 10/10, they arent 10/10 games for me, but GTA is better, in my opinion (how many times do i need to write that so i dont get flamed)

Tell me again how the multiplatform strategy was supposed to fix everything. Look at your results and compare them to Nintendo, which keeps thriving with exclusives. Your loyal fans are gone. And let’s not forget the pile of IPs you purchased only to let them rot.

The worst thing is this is down from last years numbers/expectations which was down from the previous years numbers/expectations. You think about how long “down” has been a consistent part of the communication and you realize those subscriptions are what’s holding that boat together. The price cut of gamespass is still a price raise in a string of price raises. They are trying to use players to offset the missing revenue. Now call of duty is out of gamespass, which is literally WHY they bought the company. To draw people to the subscription. They realized they missed a boatload of money and that wasn’t sustainable. Now you pay for it like you would have if they never bought the company… so why buy the company? Mind you those billions still need to be paid back. Yeah it gives you a chance to say we make the biggest FPS… but the internal conversations must be brutal at high level on topics that really matter. Like revenue. Profitability. And ROI for the shopping spree.

Is this like the 10th quarter in a row they're down 33% on hardware how is that even mathematically possible. You would think their mediocrity would Plateau