Australian PSN and Xbox Live users get the jitters when some point to the inevitability of digital downloads. Let's take the PSN store for example, for a quick comparison of some new and upcoming releases:
PSN:
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare - $99.95
Lords of the Fallen - $89.95
PES 2015 - $84.95
GTAV - $99.95
Now here's the comparable prices for disc editions from major retailers:
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare - $59
Lords of the Fallen - $79
PES 2015 - $84
GTAV - $79
For some, the difference is minor or non-existant, but for major titles, the differences are huge. A near $40 difference for the latest Call of Duty is two thirds of a new release game. All this comes to a lack of competition. PSN and Xbox Live are closed systems, and unlike PC models of distribution, their digital stores have no alternative - it's locked to the system you own.
To appease publishers, Sony and Microsoft let publishers charge whatever they want on their respective stores. Even older games are not immune, with digital prices for 12 month old titles showing little difference from release date pricing.
Compare this to the competitive landscape of retail, and the differences are night and day. In week one of a new release, a distributor may sell a new release game to a retailer for little margin - at around $60-$80. In an effort to shift more copies, publishers will also offer rebates to retailers on games sold to sell at cost. This guarantees cheaper prices at launch, and stiff competition between retailers ensures net benefit to the consumer. By week two, the cost of a new game at wholesale can sometimes drop as much as 50%, depending on the title and its first week of sales. These prices are then reflected at the counter to consumers.
Meanwhile, PSN and Xbox Live retain a steady, high price for games well after the initial release window.
As digital downloads become more and more popular, the price we pay for our games on digital stores doesn't seem to change. This is despite the fact that distribution via digital should be a huge net saving to publishers. While we all rush headlong into the digital future extolling its virtues, maybe we should take stock of the fact that we are really seeing the rise of a monopoly retail model, which will hurt us all in the end, and will damage the industry.
Does Pokémon Champions successfully open up a previously difficult-to-access side of the franchise? Or is it less than super effective?
Skewed and Reviewed have posted a positive review of the new WWE game. They liked the graphics and action but said the current scenes distract from the action.
Tech4Gamers writes: "A PlayStation Support assistant has confirmed that the 30-day timer implemented by the new DRM policy is part of an update and isn’t a bug. While responding to a fan’s query, PS support revealed that all games purchased digitally after March 2026 will be affected by this time limit.
If your PS4 or PS5 does not connect to the internet within 30 days, the game’s license will expire, and it won’t launch on the console unless the connection is restored. Hence, every digital game you purchase from now on will require an online check-in, or else you will lose ownership."
That is wild lol. Steam already does this for some games depending on the developer...but man...all digital games on ps5...
FYI, it hasn't actually been confirmed. This is just a lot of assumptions. If this is the case i would expect Sony to come out and say so. Chat bot response doesn't count as official confirmation.
People are also saying this is also an inadvertent mistake. If this is the case Sony and its customers would be best served by coming out and saying so.
If this isn't a mistake I think they need to confirm it and Playstation gamers should complain.
This has to be a mistake.
“Received word from an anonymous insider. The Sony DRM issue is unintentional. From what we gathered, Sony accidentally broke something while fixing an exploit. They've known about the confusing UI for a while, but didn't see it as urgent. Hoping for a clarifying statement now.”
I find their communication to be very poor. If this is an error on their part why let people get worried about it? I understand they don't respond to rumor but sometimes they make it worse by not responding and this is an unforced error on top of and apparent unforced error.
The screenshot from the article is from an AI chat bot, there are plenty of screenshots floating around from actual human chat reps stating the opposite.
It this is real then I will never buy digital again and if the PS6 is digital only then it will be the first Playstation Console I wont buy
"Games will vanish" is click baity as hell...all you have to do is log in and the license is restored.
ok fair enough from an aussie point of view that's bad but in Ireland it's opposite... you'll almost always find Digital to be cheaper than physical here.
i think the worst so far has been Trials Fusion nearly 50 euro in shops (after nearly 7 months it's still 45 euro), 20 euro on the online xbox store, 30 euro (43 aus dollars) difference is farcical
and it's not just limited to that COD was between 5-10 more expensive, lords of the fallen 10+, Sleeping dogs nearly 15 and so on and so forth
on a personal front there's no benefit to physical for me, i'm lucky enough to have a ridiculously high internet cap, good speeds, never trade in
Here in the USA, its costs a full $60 for digital up to 2 years after release while the physical editions are available for $30.
Personally i don't see why we can't always have physical and digital as an option. Moving fowards doesn't mean one way needs to go.
if you want digital only then Steam is the only viable option to be honest. Digital on consoles is not only a scam but often have pesky DRM too.
I prefer physical. I'm not always close to an accessible Internet connection at the oil rig so my gaming is purely offline and couch co-op when I'm at work for 14 days straight. So that's why digital and drm are my biggest fears as a casual gamer. Also why I skipped out on titanfall and Diablo3