Hello, Profile Stalker

AKR

Contributor
CRank: 20Score: 184470

The XBOX One Just Lost Its ID Card ~ But is that a Bad Thing?

AKR|4303d ago |Blog Post|13|

Microsoft has been doing 180s with the XBOX One practically from before the system was even released; so seeing their latest “reverse-maneuver” isn’t exactly surprising. While not a huge surprise – I have to give MS credit for doing this rather swiftly. It’s only been a little over 6 months from since the XBOX One first hit market. Therefore, this change can be considered a rather quick one.

Regardless, while it’s a quick change – it’s a good one, sort of...

This really can be considered to be a two-sided coin. There’s the heads and tails, to this new situation. Let’s discuss the “heads” first.

On the good side of things; this makes the XBOX One a much more flexible system. It brings the price down, right into the same ballpark as its most direct competitor – the PS4, thus putting more pressure on Sony (and Nintendo’s) camp. This will now give more people (like myself) – more of a reason to buy the One, considering that the annoying Kinect is now no longer necessary to operate the system. While the original Kinect for 360, flew off of shelves and into the households of millions, it left a sour taste in the mouths of many. While the IDEA behind it was a good one – its execution wasn’t exactly the best. It had its shortcomings, which quickly became prevalent. It was laggy, and it was tacky. It simply didn’t work as well in reality, as it did on a nice promo ad. The thing really didn’t get very popular, outside of the plethora of “Kinect-exclusive” titles that followed; most of which were just down-right sub-par at best.

With the XBOX One’s new Kinect – Microsoft seemed more confident. This was supposed to be the REAL deal. This was to be the device that not only changed the playing field, but made the XBOX One an amazing system; because it was the only one that had such a companion. It’s a shame that the exact opposite happened.

The fans reacted: “THIS ISN’T WHAT WE WANTED!!!” “WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS?!” – Simply so; Microsoft had already left a sour taste from the original Kinect. One of the worst moves they made with the XBOX One was now trying to force it down, as a core-component. The fact that they didn’t think about this prior, is astounding. But who knows? Maybe they did. Even so, at the same time, they probably just came to the conclusion that, if they show the “improvements” they made; people would react in a more positive manner towards it. Unfortunately, that didn’t work, so, that’s why this is a good thing. It shows that Microsoft, has admitted to their mistake, and is now trying to re-write their wrong. While they SHOULD have done this in the FIRST PLACE; like the old saying goes – its better late than never, right?

With that now established; what could possibly be WRONG with this decision? I mean, come on – they LISTENED to their fans, and are giving people OPTIONS, this time. How is any of that BAD? Now, listen – I’m not trying to put a negative spin on good news. I hate it when “journalists” do this – so, I myself, will be no hypocrite. Nevertheless – as I said before – this is a two-sided coin. There is the heads and the tails. We just covered the heads, so now for the tails.

So, how can this be wrong? Well, while it does put the system in better alignment with the PS4 – now being priced the same – it ends up putting pressure on both (well, all 3) camps. How so? Well, now that Microsoft gave up the XBOX One’s “ID Card” – they have to find some way to get people to actually recognize the system. What am I talking about? Well, think of it like this. Everyone who lives in modern society has some form of an ID Card. It could be something like your passport, your driver’s license or your birth certificate. You get the point. That ID Card identifies you as a person. It differentiates you from the 7+billion other people that live on this planet.

So, how does this apply to the XBOX One?

The Kinect, is what set the XBOX One apart from the 2 other consoles, especially the PS4. Neither other systems had something like the Kinect. That belonged to the XBOX One, and that’s what changed the playing field. Microsoft had some heavy confidence in it, this time around. This was the new way to control your system, as well as its games. This was going to be the kingpin of your entertainment hub. That’s the premise that the Kinect had. Now with it gone, the XBOX One has to mainly rely on the most important thing; games.

Unlike Nintendo and Sony (especially, Nintendo) ~ Microsoft doesn’t have a plethora of first-party exclusives under their belt. The XBOX brand has been carried on the backs, (on the majority side of things), by third-party multiplats for eons now. Yes, it has franchises like HALO, Gears of War and Forza – but the sheer amount lacks when put up against the likes of Sony or (especially) Nintendo. With that being the case – with Kinect gone, MS now has to try 2x harder to push the One into more households. It may be the same price as the PS4; but with the PS4 continuously getting more praise, and arguably, better versions of multiplats, not to mention some great first-party offerings; it automatically makes the PS4 the better bang-for-your-buck. Even Nintendo is getting more aggressive with their Wii U campaign, with a lot of neat stuff planned. But just going by what we know about, that Mario Kart 8 bundle alone is an amazing idea.

Microsoft needs something like that; a killer-bundle that will make buyers go “Whoa! I need that now!” They need to grab some more exclusive titles from third-party studios, like what they did with Titanfall and Sunset Overdrive. They need to create more first-party studios, if they have too. In the end - they just need to beef up their campaign, and make sure that they have a plethora of options in the games department, that will attract new buyers, and sway them away from Nintendo and Sony’s offerings. The XBOX One hasn’t been doing too hot sales-wise, part of which is due to the Kinect. That $100 drop in price, will work more wonders than one might think. But dropping the price will do little-to-nothing much, without a good swing of great games to accompany it. I’m pretty sure that MS knows this, and their plans have may very well have already been put into motion. With that being the case, this year’s E3 is looking incredibly interesting. What will MS do now with the XBOX One going Kinect-less? Will it be enough to spark the sales, or is this just a minor change in this “console-war”? Only time will tell. Regardless; this is still a good idea, bar-none.

darthv724302d ago

Next 180 they need to review is user replaceable hdd.

Kavorklestein4302d ago

There is supposed to be external HDD support coming soon, I'm sure we'll hear about it at E3, if not sooner.

Kayant4302d ago

I don't think so. Looking at the teardowns from fixit and it wouldn't be a wise thing to do as it's not as easy as the PS4's and can very easily lead to hardware damage if done wrongly. They are better served on getting out the update for external HDDs as fast as fast as possible.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

vs

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Also your warranty is voided in the progress. "Bad news: replacing the hard drive requires voiding the warranty. Good news: it's a standard 2.5 inch SATA II drive. Unknown news: we're not sure if the Xbox One will recognize unformatted SATA hard drives."

http://www.ifixit.com/Teard...

If there is something they should 180 on it's there f2p stance because like the app paywall it simply shouldn't exist.

OT - "They need to grab some more exclusive titles from third-party studios, like what they did with Titanfall and Sunset Overdrive. They need to create more first-party studios" - They are addressing this ok so far. There current diveristy of titles is quite good but how long that reminds in a few years we should see. Phil says they have some "unannounced studios" one of them being LXP although they sound like they are more vested in kinect
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...
http://www.joystiq.com/2012...
Although the rabbit hole goes deeper :p -- > http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Conzul4302d ago

Now if only they did a 180 on all that intrusive dashboard advertising and I'd be persuaded to buy one to sit next to my PS4.

LMFAO, like THAT'LL ever happen!!! XD =P

darthv724302d ago

Intrusive??? really??? maybe your definition and my definition are different.

you have to make a conscious effort to stop on one of the ads for it to even make a sound. otherwise they are just in their own happy little window in the corner.

I can agree that ads (in general) suck but some of them are related to content found within the live marketplace. Ads for movies or tv or even up coming games vs the ones that are pure ads for insurance or deodorant. But hey...at least with those you also get entries into contests for games or other giveaways so i guess it isnt all bad.

Conzul4302d ago

Indeed my definition IS different, since you only see an add as intrusive if you can hear it.

If I can see an advertisement with my eye balls then it is intruding.

On a Playstation, I can power and go all the way to a game and back and then to my web browser all without seeing a single ad. I can go to Netflix or MU or VU without ads. At least when present they are all corralled into the same general area which is entirely skippable.

Oh, and on my PC I can block them entirely.

darthv724302d ago

"On a Playstation, I can power and go all the way to a game and back and then to my web browser all without seeing a single ad. I can go to Netflix or MU or VU without ads. At least when present they are all corralled into the same general area which is entirely skippable."

while this is true, you are describing the cross media bar. there is a very distinct difference between that and the nxe that the xbox uses. The marketplace is meant to be fully integrated on the xbox UI. That means that yes you can go to your stuff and do the exact same as the XMB if you choose to do so.

The PS store is detached from the XMB in that you need to either make the effort to go to the store or click on one of the links that takes you to the section of the store from whence you started. If in the video section, you go to the video section of the store. If in the music section, you go to the music section of the store.

And each time you leave the store to go back to something on the xmb you are asked if you want to leave. not a very well conceived way of doing things but...it's sony's first try (I am using the PS3 as the example). So while the xbox has its integrated store and personal content all within a few clicks is why you see ads. but again, there is a difference between intrusive and passive ads.

Now you will probably not see a difference because you just see the blanket part of "they are ads...I dont like ads". to each their own. You might be surprised by the stuff they give away if you stopped and looked once in a while.

I dont mind the ads that either service provides (yes there are ads on the xmb found in the PS store related links). as they arent intrusive as you say. They do not prohibit my scrolling through the content in any way.

If you were subjected to having to watch an ad before you could even change sections or download a demo then that would be a perfect example of intrusive as well as forced ads.

BitbyDeath4302d ago

Parity clause also needs to go, sure it works out great for Sony getting a ton of exclusives but overall it is hurting developers and that needs to stop.

Kavorklestein4302d ago (Edited 4302d ago )

Parity Clause isn't real.
It shouldn't matter that much even IF it existed. If a game remains 97% identical to the same game you can play elsewhere, or on a different system, with or without better graphics, then go for which ever seems more like what you want. But Don't cry about graphics or parity when you're only whining about that 3 OR LESS percent that you didn't see or get with _______ version of a game.

BitbyDeath4302d ago

No, parity clause is about timing.
Devs are not allowed to release games on Xbox unless Xbox comes first and most indies cannot afford to release on multiple consoles at once so they go exclusive to PS4.

jnemesh4300d ago

There ARE "parity clauses" that prevent developers from having features present on the PS4 and not on the XB1! And there are games that will scale back performance on the PS4 to equal what the XB1 will do...a perfect example is the new Wolfenstein...runs at 1080p/60fps on both consoles...how? They dumbed down the graphics until the game ran smoothly on the XB1, then used the same settings on the PS4. So don't talk about this like it's not an issue!

jnemesh4300d ago

The "war" this gen was over when the specs were first announced by Sony and Microsoft. MS killed the much maligned Kinect...great. Good for them. Now you have 2 consoles, both selling for $400...one has better graphics, more power, and most importantly, more exclusive games. The other has Halo. The choice is pretty easy...if you are over 12 years old, get a PS4.

Geekman4298d ago

Dude, I chose the PS4, but I gotta say, you sound like you're UNDER 12 years old.

20°

IRON GUARD: Salvation PSVR2 Launch Set for Next Month

IRON GUARD: Salvation is finally making the jump onto PSVR2, bringing strategic VR action to the PlayStation 5.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
20°
8.7

Tales of Berseria Remastered Review | RPGFan

Tales of Berseria is still a high point of the series and the genre with its excellent storytelling, but the baffling decision to port a game that is readily available on modern platforms is puzzling.

30°

70s-style Robot Anime Geppy-X remaster announced for PS5, Xbox Series, PS4, Switch, and PC

Publisher Bliss Brain and developer Implicit Conversions have announced 70s-style Robot Anime Geppy-X, a remastered version of the 1999-released, Japan-only PlayStation game 70’s Robot Anime Geppy-X. It will launch for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series, PlayStation 4, Switch, and PC via Steam on July 16.

isarai_lee4h ago

HOLY SH!TBALLZ!! grabbing thisday 1