10.
They almost always miss out at least one of the most obvious choices, most
likely as a way of getting people to write on the forum.
9.
No matter how bad they are you always feel compelled to look at the end to see
what game won.
8.
They normally only include one or two per page so it takes about ten minutes
just to skip to the end.
7.
It is a blatant way of filling space without having to resort to original
content.
6.
They are over used to the point of being completely irrelevant. IGN must
publish about 15 each day.
5.
No matter what the specific category is Zelda or Mario will probably win.
4.
As an industry we have barely been around for more than a quarter of a century
and are arguably still in our infancy, yet we are almost continually patting
our selves on the back for how much we’ve achieve.
3.
No matter how bad a countdown is people always get upset because their
favourite game wasn’t included.
2.
It’s just someone’s opinion and barely ever has properly justified reasons for
the often almost random choices.
1.
The pointlessly grandiose statement ‘of all time’ is a fallacy. This is because
it includes the future as well as the past. To say that something is the best
of all time means that it is not only the best that has so far been created but
it is also better than anything else that will ever be created up until the end
of time. Furthermore, there is an additional inherent assumption that no other
life forms exist in other times or places that also play video games, which may
be better than ours.
If you evaluate the game's scope, genre, mechanics, graphics and many other criterion including the fun factor there is obviously a way to rate that game, and because one person likes the game doesn't mean that you will however it is by a more general opinion that these games are judged and thus the decision is justified. However if these aspects are not taken into account and it is based on one individuals take (which is the case most of the time) many of your points are valid.
The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.
These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse
Tell me again how the multiplatform strategy was supposed to fix everything. Look at your results and compare them to Nintendo, which keeps thriving with exclusives. Your loyal fans are gone. And let’s not forget the pile of IPs you purchased only to let them rot.
The worst thing is this is down from last years numbers/expectations which was down from the previous years numbers/expectations. You think about how long “down” has been a consistent part of the communication and you realize those subscriptions are what’s holding that boat together. The price cut of gamespass is still a price raise in a string of price raises. They are trying to use players to offset the missing revenue. Now call of duty is out of gamespass, which is literally WHY they bought the company. To draw people to the subscription. They realized they missed a boatload of money and that wasn’t sustainable. Now you pay for it like you would have if they never bought the company… so why buy the company? Mind you those billions still need to be paid back. Yeah it gives you a chance to say we make the biggest FPS… but the internal conversations must be brutal at high level on topics that really matter. Like revenue. Profitability. And ROI for the shopping spree.
Is this like the 10th quarter in a row they're down 33% on hardware how is that even mathematically possible. You would think their mediocrity would Plateau
And a greatest games list will always be "controversial" since different people like different genres and games...
I think you have nailed it. They are pretty much useless, nice blog post though.