I'm a PS3 fan because simply put I trusted Sony's 1st and 2nd party from the start and I love how they surprise me with amazing new IP's.

Folklore was a great experience, Insomniac, Naughty Dog, and I'm sure soon Sucker Punch will surprise me by showing they can create games that aren't stuck to the genre's that they were accustomed to.

Oh and this may be off topic but in the article where they state 6 reasons why GOW3 will be awesome you should go to the site and see this Xbox fanboy (The Sandbag) he's so ignorant and dumb it's hilarious.

It's good to see some Folklore/soul love! Fantastic game that was overlooked...by some.

I heard it's good nor great, whats the gameplay mechanics like and does it have a strong story?

It's a blog though bro. Mean't to be opinion and quality has nothing to do with it. It's not news hence there is nothing wrong with it...

I know it opinion and nothings official but this just causes more fighting and bickering. These stupid "fanboys blogs" are doing actual harm which, although minor, still make things a little bit worse.

Oh and Action, you think I'm a douchebag? Pretty stupid thing to say considering you seem to have enough free time on your hands to write a stupid blog that you should know isn't going to do anything.

some fresh air.

You try too hard Soda. Enjoy your Pinatas, oh wait...you're a poser that doesn't game. Nevermind.

"Too many times I let my temper and gift of Internet anonymity de-evolve me to the point of silliness."

And you proved that yet again with this blog. You don't see me writing blogs, do you? That's cause I spend that time gaming.

1st party titles aren't the only games that matter, but when your competition ALSO has Madden,FIFA,Guitar Hero,Rock band,Tony Hawk,Call of Duty,Final Fantasy,Need for Speed,etc. they sure as sh!t matter. Love your show btw.

That's just him "in character." It's kinda hard to hear his sarcastic humors tone through text. Just imagine Colbert's face/voice and read it again. ;]

Fable 2 which ironically isn`t on your list of AAA games, is the best game for the system. By far.

So, Screw reviews. Reviewers are jaded.

You trying to ignore the fact that the PS3 has the highest percentage of quality games is just plain ignorance. That means when you go to the store to buy a PS3 game, no matter which one it is, you have the best chance out of the 3 major consoles of getting a quality game. I would much rather have a higher chance of finding a random game and liking it than having 40+ quality rated games that I don't give a sh!t about. Also, having the most 80+ rated games does not mean that console has the best games either. I could easily argue that Killzone 2, LittleBigPlanet, and Metal Gear Solid 4 are better than every game on the 360 in their respected genres, and you can't play those on PC, can you? Also, last gen, the PS2 was not the BEST console, the best console was probably the XBOX, but nobody cared because in the end everyone wanted their Sony franchises. You can look back even further, and a better example of this was the Dreamcast. The Dreamcast was vastly superior to its competition, and it was far ahead of it's time. Since it didn't sell the most, does that mean it wasn't the best? No. Your argument is the same BS that blind fanboys like yourself always say, but you always refuse to accept the other side of the equation. Maybe if you saved up enough money for a PS3 you could enjoy both systems (like I do) and stop having to defend your precious 360. Honestly, how are you going to feel after you've been defending your 360 all day and night just to have it slap you in the face with an E74 or RRoD? Let's start judging the best consoles based on quality, how about that?

IMO Mass Effect is the best 360 exclusive. 1st grown-up game with no corny, unnatural dialogue.

you'd think devs didn't know the largest gaming demographic is 18-34 males, based on the kiddy trash they continue to spew...

sure I play many anyway, don't have much of a choice. I try to just enjoy them on the merits they DO have. but it's a major pet peeve of mine.

You mean he hit the nail in the head?

Have you not learned how to reply yet? Which multiplats are you playing that are so inferior on the PS3? The biggest selling multiplat (GTAIV) had little to no difference and you could even argue the PS3 version looked better. What about RE5? That one looked almost identical on both consoles. The only people that talk about inferior multiplats are blind fanboys like yourself that couldn't even tell the difference if they played both games side by side. How many games do you have for your 360? Are you interested in 137 "quality games", or is that just a number that makes you feel better when you go to sleep at night? I wasn't implying that you were talking about sales either, genius, but you were originally discussing which "console" was the best not which "console's games" were the best. You brought up the PS2, so I too used that as an example to show you that the best-selling console isn't always the best console, or in your case the console with the most "quality games" (quality determined by people other than you or I with a lot of them still giving extremely low scores to these "quality games") isn't always the best console. The sad thing is, myself and all of my friends that own 360's (more than my PS3 owning friends) cringe every time our 360 freezes or the picture won't show up, because the 360 seems to be a ticking time bomb that could go at any moment. I prefer the better console this gen, and that would happen to be my PS3. However, I do own a 52in 1080p 120hz TV, so that may be why I enjoy the HD power of my PS3.

As far as Halo 3 being better than Killzone 2, I couldn't care less about your "reasons". The games come down to preference, and I prefer the more realistic shooter as opposed the kiddy shooter. I also find it hard to believe that you play your 360 a lot, because your gamerscore is only 755. I thought mine was low! lol. Do you play any games at all, or did you just get your 360 and decided to become a die hard worshipper of it automatically?

What multiplats are so inferior? Seriously? Just because you pretend that the 360's multiplat superiority is a falicy doesn't make it so. How about the Orange Box, Fallout 3, GTA4 (we have DLC :D), Tomb Raider, COD4. Pretty much any multiplat that doesn't have trophies. Heck. Even lense of truth showed that graphically multiplats are still superior on the 360. Check out Legends of Wrestlemania if you don't believe me. Don't care if they were ported onto the PS3 from the 360 in development: it still doesn't make them an less inferior. So now that we have established the 360's multiplat superiority we can move on.

I currently own 18 games for my 360 and only three for my PS3 but to be fair I did buy my 360 first. No, I'm not interested in ALL 139 games for the 360 but it sure does give me a LOT more to choose from so that also ends that argument. I'm up 2 - 0 for those keeping score. ;)

So, the system with the most quality games isn't necessarily the best? I don't know about you but I buy and play my consoles for GAMES. They are GAME consoles.

Now on to your admittance of internet stalking me! My gamertag that I use to get achievements on is USMC Mothman X. I put up Sovereign IX in my profile because that's my gold account and Mothman is a silver.

Now for the recap! The 360 has 42 more quality games than that of the PS3. The 360's multiplats are generally better than those on the PS3 (not all but most). In fact, find me a multiplat that had huge problems on the 360 like Fallout 3 or the Orange Box did on the PS3. It's pretty much a foregone conclusion that the 360 has the better online. ALSO, the 360 has the better controller. Now, yes, that's a subjective matter but hey, it fits in your hands unlike the PS3's that you have to contort your hands in order to hold.

One last thing, you like to bring up issues with me instead of talking about my points. "u dun even hav a PS3!!!!" "ur gamerscore iz 2 low!!!!". This is obviously due to the fact that the PS3 doesn't have as much upside in terms of games and online as the 360. Now EFF off while I go beat MGS4 for the eigth time.

First of all, congratulations on figuring out how to use the reply button. As far as my admitting to "internet stalking" you, OMG YES, I did click on your name and saw your gamerscore in the bottom right-hand corner. Perhaps you should learn how to use the site properly. As far as you imagining that you have won some sort of argument, that's fine. lol. I don't jerk off to my console every night. However, the 2 biggest games you mentioned (GTAIV, and COD4) were both preferred by many game journalists on the PS3 for the visuals, but apparently there is just such a huuuuggee difference that you and only you can see that you just HAD to buy it on the PS3. You probably don't own an HDTV, I understand that. I probably wouldn't play my PS3 much either. It is interesting that you "never" play your PS3 yet you are trying to beat Metal Gear for the "8th time". lol. If your only point about the 360 being a better console is that it has more quality games, 90% of which nobody cares about, then that is fine as well. I guess we can all just forget that Microsoft rushed their console to market a full year before its competitors, resulting in the worst failure rate in consumer electronics history and a forced BILLION dollar investment in warranty extension. Whatever makes you feel better, buddy. It's scary to think that you had your 360 first with such a low gamerscore. I guess you don't really play games that much at all anyway. lol. Have fun enjoying the best game this gen, exclusive to the PS3, while defending your 360 like it is the most important thing in your life. It's truly sad that you can't see anyone else's views but your own. You and people like you (blind fanboys), are what is wrong with this gen.