All Channels
Popular
180°

$99 Xbox 360 Kinect Bundle is official

Gamertag Radio writes: "The $99 Xbox with $15 monthly subscription is official. Here's how to redeem this offer at your local Microsoft Store."

Read Full Story >>
gamertagradio.com
zeal0us5123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

360(15*24)+99=459(not including tax)
299(cost of 4gb kinect)+ ~99(2 12y xbl gold)=398 (not including tax)

Hope the extra money is worth it.

Dante1125123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

Seems like a rip off. They didn't even give you the 250GB 360, instead they give you 4GB 360. And for $450?...oh Microsoft. I still think it's gonna be a huge hit in North America lol.

ardivt5123d ago

yeah it is a rip off
but we better get used to this because I'm afraid this will be the pricing models for the next gen consoles. perhaps ms wants to try out if it really works.
by this sony and ms could make powerful consoles and make them relatively cheap or at least pretend they are cheap just the way it is with smartphones.

GribbleGrunger5123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

it may be a rip off but it will sell well regardless because most people only think short term, but PS3 owners should rejoice. this can only drive the 360s market further in the direction of Kinect and casual, which eventually will lead to more people buying a PS3 for core/hardcore games and of course the plethora of fantastic exclusives.

microsoft are making a BIG mistake with their core/hardcore audience by going in this direction. 3rd parties won't want to take any risks or waste substantial amounts of money on the casuals. it's all good. Microsoft can sell the to mums, dads and kids, while Sony can cater for the true gamer. both camps win

WeskerChildReborned5123d ago

I alway's wondered why they have a 4gb than have a 250gb. Wouldn't it be better if the 4gb was like a 120gb cause 4gb is just asking you to buy the 250gb hard drive.

Anon19745123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

I disagree. Sure it costs you a bit more in the long run but the convenience of not having to slap down all the cash up front is certainly appealing to people on a limited budget, like students for example. I think this is a smart move by Microsoft and I wouldn't be surprised if we see this pricing model available as an option next gen as well. The difference in price over 2 years is pretty nominal.

In my mind, consumer choice is rarely a bad thing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5123d ago
Karum5123d ago

To me it's not a good deal at all but I think what they are doing is aiming this at people who might want a 360 but having the cash up front is a problem for.

I think there are definitely people out there who fall into that bracket and will go for it. Of course I never would simply because it's a bad deal in my eyes but I can appreciate that for some this will be an easy way of getting into Xbox gaming.

BUT, here is the big thing for me. I'm pretty sure that there will be a new Xbox released within 2 years and whilst this subscription will carry over to a new console, how are these people supposed to get into the new Xbox experience when it arrives?

I suppose based on what I said above these people wouldn't be buying the new Xbox anyway since up front cash is likely the only reason anyone would go for this deal and would likely still be an issue for many of the same people when the new Xbox comes out.

In some ways this is definitely a clever move by Microsoft as there is probably a market out there for this kind of deal (if there isn't MS aren't going to lose anything with people not taking the deal up) but at the same time it's a bad deal for anyone that has the disposable income or saves up to just outright buy a 360 and a LIVE subscription.

KMCROC545123d ago

Seem like the difference's the price we pay for almost any new game released. sounds like a try .

forcefullpower5123d ago

This could actually piss of people and hurt there reputation in the long run. What happens if they announce the release of the 720 to be release in 12 Months time and you have just bought into a 2 year contract you can't get out.

LOGICWINS5123d ago

Nothing. The mainstream will just continue eating it up...the same way people line up to get an IPAD Day 1 even though they are armed with the knowledge that it will be out of date in the following year.

You underestimate the stupidity of modern consumers.

forcefullpower5123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

But most people don't go out and buy every edition of the ipad they may do with the iphone. With the iphone people got caught into a 2 year contract and then missed out on the new edition 12 month later. This was quite common and i had quite a few friends that where pissed off when this happened. Most phone companies now offer both 12 month and 2 years now if you pay a little more money a month. Which is why it may sounds great at first causing them a lot of sales but in the long run it could hurt there reputation.

As in my friends left the mobile company they with just because of it.

coolbeans5123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

You're missing the entire point of this deal by using that comparison. This was never meant to be cheaper, this was meant to LOOK cheaper. It's the same "foot in the door" tactic employed by mortgage comps, used car salesmen, and more across the globe. Are you ever curious how much more you'll be paying for that new car over time instead of paying upfront?

Let's not have a myopic view into thinking EVERYONE who decides to go after this deal is an idiot. It's simply a business deal you've seen employed time and time again on TV commercials that's beneficial to a certain group of people.

LOGICWINS5123d ago

By the Gods, a man of logic!

Outside_ofthe_Box5123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

***By the Gods, a man of logic!***

Says the one calling anyone who goes after this deal stupid, ignorant, uninformed, getting tricked and getting screwed. lol

I do agree though. coolbeans is among the only two I see consistently make sense and use logic 100% of the time on this site. The other being beatdown.

grahf5123d ago

It is still cheaper than using a credit card, they skip Visa/Master Card and collect directly on a lowered interest rate.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5123d ago
Siren305123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

So I guess your against loans for cars and houses or buying anything with a credit card too since in the long run your paying more than just buying it outright.

grahf5123d ago

Oh, lets add one more tidbit of math to the problem.

A lot of people can't afford to throw down anywhere from $350 - $450 in one go, so what would they normally use???

CREDIT CARDS!!!

Check out the credit card calculator from the US Federal Reserve website (google, i can't direct link)

Go ahead and throw in whatever value you want in for the best deal you can get, and then throw in you your CC APR%. After it tells you how long it will take to pay off, you can actually enter how much you would pay a month. Throw in $15 and see how long it will take and how much interest has accrued. Its pretty amazing.

Pay everything upfront if you can, or use a payment plan. DON'T USE CREDIT CARDS.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5123d ago
StrongMan5123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

Not as smart as charging people for viewing ads, online play, Facebook, Youtube, and other free features that are free on every other device known to man.

@Perjoss

People buy XBL because they have no choice if they want to play the online portion of their games that they already paid $60 for. Can't play COD multi player on Xbox without paying big daddy Microsoft first to access that part of your game that you already paid $60 for. Keep telling yourself paying for twitter and access to Netflix is "worth it" if it helps you sleep at night.

Perjoss5123d ago

If the Xbox 360 wasn't worth it, people would not buy it. If Xbox Live wasn't worth it, people wouldn't subscribe to it.

But people do, so...

Hanilugtehul5123d ago

perjoss@ if i want to play online with my 360,i have too pay money and i did(my 3rd xbox just rrd), but that dont mean it was worth the money. Peace:-)

Adva5123d ago

XBL is only bought as it is a necessary component to complete your Xbox experience or any game for that matter.

Without Gold, you don't have online play, netflix, streaming etc.

TheRealHeisenberg5123d ago

Perjoss is absolutely right. 360 and Live Gold are worth the money if you want to pay for them. Although I think it is a fantastic service I simply chose not to pay for Live anymore because it ended up not being worth it to me. PSN for me as long as multiplayer is free.

Siren305123d ago (Edited 5123d ago )

I've never payed more than $40 a year for xbl. Last year I got that deal right off the dashboard from one of those ads your talking about. Having a party chat and being able to hear my friends clearly without having to listen to everyone else is great, plus there are alot of games where you can just select join party and you are put right in their game. Also there pretty good sales every week, which is the big reason why people pay $50 a year for playstation plus

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5123d ago
Godmars2905123d ago

Smart for MS, bad for consumers. Especially for ones who mistakenly buy into this deal but not understand the fine print.

LOGICWINS5123d ago

I personally don't feel bad for the consumers..they don't even feel bad for themselves. Millions pay $30 a month to pay the mandatory data fee for their smartphones when many of them could have opted to just gt a regular phone that doesn't require an expensive data plan. Consumers bring this thing onto themselves.

iistuii5123d ago

$450= £284 approx . A 360 4gb with kinect is selling for £250 in Game uk..then add the £70 2 years live on top, = £320 it's not a rip off at all. Ok you can shop around for cheaper version online, but compared to the high street, it's about right if not a better deal.

Drekken5123d ago

A sucker is born everyday.

Show all comments (42)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio17d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing17d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9217d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit17d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing17d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9217d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay19d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn219d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn219d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown19d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay19d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay19d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac18d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger19d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300019d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde19d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde19d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7520d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_18d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.