All Channels
Popular
170°

Dark Souls PC Dev Responds To DRM Backlash

From Software has responded to the backlash following its announcement of Dark Souls: Prepare To Die edition, as well as the DRM measures that go along with it. The studio has spoken with NowGamer about the controversial decision.

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
jimmins5137d ago

GFWL is awful, but if that's the only way the game will make it to PC, gamers will have to suck it up.

Hellsvacancy5137d ago

The online wasnt done very well with Dark Souls anyway, Demons Souls was so much better in that sense

wallis5137d ago

Yeah because nothing disuades piracy like making legitimate sale a pain in the ass and giving piracy a good excuse.

And as for games for windows live preventing piracy!? Are they serious!? Steam prevents piracy. Windows live prevents you from keeping your God damned achievements and privacy. Piracy is rampant on GFWL just like any other platform.

Tr10wn5137d ago

Steam prevents piracy? in your world i guess.... pirates dont care if it's GFWL, Steam, Origins or Ubisoft they will still crack the game open and give it away for free, Steam have never prevent piracy, i see GFWL and Steam as equal i like the GFWL achievements more since it share it with my XBL account but beside that, i prefer Steam because almost every PC i had is on Steam or Origins.

wallis5137d ago (Edited 5137d ago )

Steam does a damn better job of it than GFWL ever did. GFWL slows the hell out of my computer, causes stuttering issues, connectivity issues, makes it difficult to play multiplayer because it needs port forwarding where as steam just works straight off the bat. It's a poorly designed piece of crap that's uglier than Bill Gates' balls. GFWL is to video games what a three inch thick condom is to sex. Unnecessary and wildly unpleasant and no reward is worth under going the discomfort when frankly there are sluttier sisters nearby.

I welcome competition to Steam but it doesn't mean squat if that competition is retarded. I would love to see another service compete with steam but frankly I don't think microsoft or EA have a damn brain cell between them. Maybe Epic will step into the race or something weird and then we'll have something worth checking out - until then it's steam or steam's mentally challenged dungeon siblings.

fastrez5137d ago

Again, DRM is crap, but they're new to the PC scene, and the game is ace. If you refuse to play Dark Souls because of this, then it's your loss. The game is fantastic.

StayStatic5137d ago

I agree , still buying it and this is a great opportunity for From Software to get into the PC scene and hopefully the next iteration in the series will be better on the PC platform, rather than a straight up port.

Personally looking forward to regardless of its shortcomings.

LightofDarkness5137d ago (Edited 5137d ago )

It's not just the DRM that's the problem. It's the painful, buggy interface, the fact that it could very well just forget your save games, the fact that a number of countries do not have GFWL support and the very high probability of hacking/cheating online.

I'll probably still buy it, but GFWL is not a minor grievance. It's screwed over so many gamers over the years that the revulsion it causes is more than deserved, and I can easily understand why some people would rather not buy the game because of it.

NYC_Gamer5137d ago (Edited 5137d ago )

It seems like people just ignore the real reasons why many of us dislike GFWL when putting out these articles

-Alpha5137d ago

What does it mean that it's a straight port? Framerate and resolution will be better, wont it?

Ducky5137d ago (Edited 5137d ago )

Means that it'll look identical to the console version except without the jaggies, and maybe some improved texture filtering.

Framerate is iffy though, as some developers purposely cap the frame-rate to 30fps due to tech/design reasons (SplitSecond and LA.Noire had this). Although there still are ways of getting those kind of games to go past the fps cap, the results aren't always pretty.

Remains to be seen what they throw in the game, and if they give any freedom to mod the game afterwards.

Show all comments (26)
40°

Sheffield says "[A new Bloodborne game won't] happen unless From Soft decides they want to do it"

Brandon writes: "I could find you 10 companies that have pitched a bloodborne sequel, spinoff, or remake, including my own. It's just not going to happen unless fromsoft decides they want to do it."

Benjaminkno69d ago

Everyone was criticizing Sony for not pushing for the BB remake. Turns out they gave it the green light. The original still holds up really well

STARS69d ago

Man this just fucking sucks, I respect Miyazaki and Shohida's wishes, but Bluepoint would have been the perfect studio to take on a project like a Bloodborne remake. It's still an absolute masterpiece, but the performance and frame pacing could easily be solved on the current hardware now.

70°

9 Video Game Locations That Hit You in the Feels: The Most Emotional Places in Gaming

There are some video game locations which hit you right in the feels. Are these the most emotional places in gaming to visit? Jump Dash Roll counts down 9 destinations in today's feature.

Read Full Story >>
jumpdashroll.com
got_dam152d ago

Is the OoT screenshot a comp of hyrule field with the Windows Vista desktop layered over the foreground?

80°

Former Sony president Shuhei Yoshida reveals why the original PS ultimately led to Bloodborne

Sony's bold entrance into the console market back in the '90s heralded the use of CD-ROMs instead of cartridges, which convinced several companies to jump on board the PlayStation train. It turns out FromSoftware was one of those companies lured in by the appeal of discs.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net