All Channels
Popular
160°

Super Mario 4 Domain Registered

The domain name for Super Mario 4 has been registered, leading many to believe the name is being reserved for the upcoming 2D Mario for the Nintendo 3DS.

Read Full Story >>
mariopartylegacy.com
DrPepper5148d ago

this sounds pretty interesting. i would love an actual 2d super mario bros. 4

come_at_me_bro5148d ago

Yeah, if this is real I really hope it's sprite based. The New Super Mario games have no character.

Instigator5148d ago

I would love a return to the style of Super Mario World, upgraded to the standards of whatever console it'd be on. The NSMB one is good enough, but they shouldn't abandon the sprites completely.

dark-hollow5148d ago

A sequel to the original Mario bros trilogy?
yes please!

Afterlife5148d ago (Edited 5148d ago )

"...Mario Party 3DS, Mario Party 11, and Mario Party 12 have all been taken by someone other than Nintendo"

Why be a d*?

--Onilink--5148d ago

they can still take them back, just as activision did with the modernwarfare site. Its obvious that people who do this arent actually going to do anything with those domains

eagle215148d ago

I agree dark-hollow, a sequel to the original mario trilogy with SMW elements (such as the cape).

PopRocks3595148d ago

Super Mario 4...

Just don't kill the physics Nintendo. Learn from Sonic Team's mistake. :)

gumgum995147d ago

Sonic team didn't do Sonic 4, Dimps are the ones who dun goofed on the physics. It's sad because knowing nintendo, they'll hit this one right out of the park. They don't have to worry about a separate dev who may or may not get what made the classic Mario games so great. Hope it's as good as yoshi's island though. ^-^

frequentcontributor5148d ago

I guess I thought Nintendo was implying a NSMB-type game as the new 2d 3ds game, but if this name ends u being correct, perhaps it'll actually be an old school, sprite-based title. Interesting.

50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7744d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer69d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi68d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer69d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot69d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno69d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay69d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno67d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK68d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)