All Channels
Popular
190°

Why Wii U’s Power Doesn’t Matter

The reports that the Wii U isn’t as powerful as the XBox 360 and Playstation 3 are about as worrisome as a cloudy day. Here's why.

Read Full Story >>
nintendoenthusiast.com
slavish5156d ago

wait so now it doesn't matter?

LOGICWINS5156d ago

It never did...to Nintendo fans at least.

ChickeyCantor5156d ago (Edited 5156d ago )

That's not true at all.
Yes many have said that Gameplay precedes graphics in priority.

But no one is denying that more processing powers make sure there is advancements.

Nintendo still did a great job with their games regardless of the hardware. Even if it was just at PS3/360 level, their games would be marvelous non the less.

I myself don't care if there is an octo-core in there. I'm just glad Nintendo is finally putting effort in advancing themselves( apposed to the wii )

slavish5156d ago

i have read alot of forums of nintendo fans being soooooooooooooooo happy they were get a system better then ps360. Also that it would be the best system out for atleast a year

gameplayingfool5156d ago

I'd like more power simply from a gameplay perspective. More power for physics, more power for draw distance, for objects on screen, etc...all of which impact how a game plays, not just looks.

Army_of_Darkness5156d ago

it will be good non the less...
and if nintendo doesn't have that stupid blocking used game bullshit, then I definitely will consider buying it.

ziggurcat5156d ago (Edited 5156d ago )

and that's why nintendo has been a huge step behind the competition.

i don't buy the whole "we don't need power, gameplay is more important" argument - it's the same as the BS "we don't need blu-ray" argument X360 fans were making. gameplay's important, yes, but quit fooling yourself into thinking that graphics don't matter.

more power means a more versatile library, and who wouldn't want that?

@ army_of_darkness: the next playstation/xbox won't have anti-used game technology, either - don't believe the terrible, unsubstantiated rumours.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5156d ago
dedicatedtogamers5156d ago

IMO, I wouldn't be bothered if the WiiU was less powerful than its contemporaries. I just want a decent step up from the Wii and lag-free connectivity between the WiiU tablet and the console.

I've never once bought a Nintendo system (console or handheld) for the hardware power. Never.

Baka-akaB5156d ago (Edited 5156d ago )

I'd be bothered , doesnt mean i'll boycott it . People can still be fans and have valid concerns or critics .

Game fandom is increasingly becoming worse than religious zeal . You're quickly nailed the the heretic's cross is you dont like something .

Indigo1235156d ago

not only does it not matter, its irrelevant

if anything it just means its guarenteed the wii u will outsell everything else

neutralgamer195156d ago

Power matters. You cant make a blanket statement and say it doesn't matter to Nintendo fans when their are many wii owners and users that wish at that time they had the money to buy a ps3 or xbox 360 or that their system was just as powerful. Bs tech and weak ports because the system couldnt handle it. Trust me they dont want the same scenario playing out. For nintendo its good because they will sell and make a profit instantly but for consumers nahhhh not true at all whether their Nintendo loyalists or not

Yes Nintendo sold gazillion wiis but how many of those wiis are catching dust? many i know quite a few and if their not someones 5 year old is playing it. So Nintendo wii selling a gazillion regardless of weak tech did not benefit the consumers but just Nintendo.

If wii u is just on par with the ps3 and xbox 360 or weaker that is a shame. That means that once again Nintendo owners will be shafted and getting the weaker ports of games when the ps4 and next xbox come out which matters.

Show all comments (23)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7745d ago (Edited 45d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer70d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi69d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer70d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot70d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno70d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay70d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno68d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK69d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)