All Channels
Popular
700°

'Dust 514' studio explains PS3 exclusivity

Dust 514 studio CCP Games has explained why it chose to make the game exclusive to the PlayStation 3.

Chief marketing officer David Reid explained that the technical implications of the shooter's connectivity with EVE Online were something that could only be catered for by the Sony platform

Read Full Story >>
digitalspy.co.uk
NYC_Gamer5149d ago

MS needs to open up their xbl policy and stop being so closed when comes to studios/publishers

Dante1125149d ago (Edited 5149d ago )

I heard that if a multiplatform game isn't up to pair with or better than the PS3 version, that MS will not allow the 360 version until they feel that it's on level. It also has to be released simultaneous on they'll can it as well. I'll try to find the link, but yeah, MS needs to fix their policies.

Edit: Source: http://www.edge-online.com/...

Drithe5149d ago

YOu are correct. This has to do with MS. MS gets pretty strict that way. I hate MS because they got Guardian Heroes and the PS did not. :(

End of Line.

GraveLord5149d ago

But Microsoft is fine with getting games BEFORE PS3. They are hypocrites and extremely greedy.

humbleopinion5149d ago

It was a misunderstanding of the Eurogamer reporter: MS demands that simultaneous releases will be identical CONTENT WISE - and Sony does exactly the same.
It means that if a game is late for the Xbox (or for the PS3) it will have to offer extra content otherwise MS/Sony will block it.
Some notable Xbox examples: Unreal Tournament (extra maps), Virtua Fighter 5 (online), Joe Danger (special edition)
Some notable PS3 examples: Bioshock (challenge rooms), Castle Crashers (volleyball game), Oblivion (DLC included).

This policy makes sense: neither MS nor Sony want to appear as if their customers are getting simple ports of old games, so that's why they push for additional contents on port and delayed games. But even to this rule there are some exceptions.

telekineticmantis5149d ago

Right now the revenue is in Kinect games PERIOD.

Anon19745149d ago

"It was a misunderstanding of the Eurogamer reporter: MS demands that simultaneous releases will be identical CONTENT WISE"

That's not what developers say. Developers have already stated that Microsoft's policy is stopping them from taking advantage of other consoles strengths.

Microsoft's policy states:
"...must ship at least simultaneously with other videogame platforms, and must have at least feature and content parity on-disc with the other video game platform versions..."

There's no confusion here from Microsoft or with developers. If you make a game that has better content or features on another platform, MS reserves the right to block it's release on the 360.

ShinMaster5149d ago

Or they won't allow the game to release?

Wow.

BitbyDeath5149d ago

Yea, but obviously they can't enforce it over the big games cause they want/need the sales. Otherwise games like Mortal Kombat and Final Fantasy would never have released on the platform.

trenso15149d ago

yup this is one reason i think ff13 got gimped :/

BattleAxe5149d ago

Common sense says that putting a free to play game on a console that is free to play online makes more sense.

gedapeleda5149d ago

Lol but good, more exclusives to ps3

Gamer19825148d ago

Yeah its nothing to do with quality its content. FF13 was proof of this. You really think they would have stopped it on 360 because it looked clearly better on ps3? Hell no.

humbleopinion5148d ago

@darkride66, didn't you bother to read the policy which you copy pasted here yourself!?
"...must ship at least simultaneously with other videogame platforms, and must have at least feature and content parity on-disc with the other video game platform versions..."

Do you understand what "feature and content parity on disc" means?
It has nothing to do with other consoles(console actually) technological strengths. It has to do with the contents: MS doesn't want the owners of the X360 to feel like they are getting less content for the same price, and this is done as a blocking move so that the developers will not choose sides. And as I said before: Sony has the exact same policies, and they are more like guidelines.
That's why most of the platform exclusive content you see is either as a compensation for games being released later, DLC content that doesn't come on the disc, or extra content that is not related to the actual game (sometimes even a bonus game).

So no. No developer stated that "Microsoft's policy is stopping them from taking advantage of other consoles strengths".
In fact, the majority of the top multiplatform games on the PS3 are barely able to compete equally with their Xbox 360 counterparts (RDR, Skyrim, Crysis 2, etc). If the developers can't even bring the PS3 up to par, how do you expect them to "take advantage of the console strengths"?

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 5148d ago
cyclindk5149d ago

They're so PC oriented as it is, you'd think it'd be a cinch for them to extend bridges between their Xbox network and PC...

THESONYPS35149d ago

Wow I have now played this for the fourth time via PS3, hope you all download it, well you know its FREE!

RedDead5149d ago

Shoulda stuck it on PC too if you are aiming for FPS and Eve fans...

Virtual_Reality5149d ago (Edited 5149d ago )

CCP want to expand EVE Universe to other Audiences (check the video). And they are allowing custom controllers and PC functions on PS3 for the PC Audience so they can jump in on PS3 without using the DS3 controller.

kaveti66165149d ago

That's a strange explanation. CCP is neglecting their PC audience by not releasing the game on PC and you're making this very strange assumption that all of CCP's fans must have PS3s as well so it's not a big deal, they just have to plug in their keyboards and mice?

By that logic, Microsoft has never screwed over the PC gaming community because it is assumed they all had 360s as well.

ginsunuva5149d ago

They don't want the Eve community to disappear. Putting this on PC eats away its own fanbase.

salinidus5149d ago

and people who have 7 years to complete a skill tree

BoNeSaW235149d ago

That video is annoying as hell and commentary is awful! Do not waste your time people. HORRIBLE.

Shadonic5149d ago

This policy of theirs is screwing with all of their consumers.

MoonConquistador5149d ago

Its also hilarious that one of the reasons cited was cross game chatting. You would have thought that MS would have the edge on that front.

Anyways, good work Sony on being so flexible with 3rd party developers.

It doesn't quite make up for shutting Zipper down though

Persistantthug5149d ago

Sony has brought in many nice developers.

Zipper couldn't make good games.....they're gone....period.

fei-hung5149d ago

I don't think Sony had much of a choice there. How much money do you think Sony has pumped into Zipper games this gen, be it on the PSP, PS3 and the VITA and how successful an investment it has been.

They could either shut Zipper down or allow all other studious to pay the price for Ziiper products shortcomings. You need to think about the greater good here and if you can't, then it would mean you rather see Sony fail as a whole as long as Zipper survives.

It's not like Sony has the billions the like of Apple or Google do!

arnyftw5149d ago

The Xbox can cross game chat, but you cant cross game chat across platforms like they did with Dust 514 on the ps3.

IHateYouFanboys5149d ago

lol

Xbox had cross platform chat since the release of shadowrun on Games for Windows Live. google it if you dont believe me.

this has nothing to do with Microsoft not "opening up" xbox live. it has everything to do with one thing - MONEY! sony wouldve paid for exclusivity. theres nothing wrong with that, companies do it all the time. but dont try and pass this off as a technical thing that the 360 cant handle.

PirateThom5149d ago (Edited 5149d ago )

IHateYouFanboys

Live is the technical problem here. EVE doesn't use Games for Windows Live and, as such, it can't connect to players on XBox 360 without running through Games for Windows Live.

It's why Portal 2 has online play between PC and PS3, but not 360.

The only "money" issue here is the fact XBox Live exissts and Microsoft won't open it up.

NotSoSilentBob5148d ago

@ IHateYouFanboys

Problem with The Shadowrun game was it was a demo of what could be done on XBL but since then M$ has clamped down on the access to live.

OMEGAZONE5149d ago

Microsoft policy sucks, a statement that simply transcends fanboyism and is actually truth. The policy is childish and only hurts it's consumers.

Show all comments (77)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
10d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted10d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8510d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele9d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk9d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay9d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
Athlon10110d ago (Edited 10d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit9d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg9d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon1019d ago (Edited 9d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz1499d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
23d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_23d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle22d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit22d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog23d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog23d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad23d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_23d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage23d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda22d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

23d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong49d ago

looks god awful on the base systems