All Channels
Popular
130°

Why Starhawk is Going to be Incredible...

BagoGames: "I absolutely loved Warhawk. In the days when brag worthy PS3 exclusives were few and far between Warhawk had been my saving grace. So, obviously, I wanted more. But rather than simply expand Warhawk, like Lightbox/Incognito had already done several times, to drag the action into orbit they instead decided to isolate the core DNA of what made their highly successful Warhawk so enjoyable and transcript it into something new. The result: Starhawk."

Read Full Story >>
bagogames.com
Bagogames5168d ago

How did you get our own stuff up before us D:

Wizardry I say...

BitbyDeath5168d ago

"P.S: Anyone caught nicking my Hawks is screwed…I mean it."

LOL, that's happened to me on occasion but usually it is my fault cause i get distracted for a few seconds and when i turn back it's transforming and speeding off into the skies.
Awesome to watch but then you realise that was yours :-(

Bagogames5168d ago

I know the feeling.

"Damn that was awesome! Now to hope into mine and -- hold the phone -- GET BACK HERE!"

But no matter how fast I run, my little legs would not keep up :(

It's all the worse when they fly STRAIGHT into a mountain after they take off. Wasters.

JBaby3435168d ago

That happened to me once then I made sure it never happened again. If someone else is on the platform I won't build a Hawk. Once built I get right in.

What kills me the most is when people build stupid stuff, especially redundant structures, and waste the 32 buildings. Often there is no strategy but when there is that game has something going.

Can't wait to see the finished product.

BitbyDeath5168d ago

I stupidly built a pod beacon in my own base one time thinking i had selected the shield.
Doh!
Happens to the best of us

ninjaman9995168d ago

One of the reasons why...cause they playtested it w a beta to prevent launch issues (Most problems at least, just thinking about the gears releases makes me shudder) and the gameplay so far is wicked fun and more on the hardcore side.
Sounds like signs of potential greatness to me :)

A LIVING LEGEND5168d ago

Warhawk will always be a great game imo, ahead of the curve if you will.
stands up to and downright beats most if not all of todays mp games,for all the right reasons imo.
So begins the evolution of a masterpiece

Bagogames5168d ago

Then comes the harsh reality that it only shifts 500,000 copies because the CoD crowd can't hack it...

JBaby3435168d ago

I think Warhawk is still the most balanced MP I've ever played. It has a STEEP learning curve but I've had some truly amazing games. It's a shame it wasn't better received.

A LIVING LEGEND5168d ago

^ that reality can itself be offset by the lack of COD crowds.

Show all comments (17)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
24d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted23d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8523d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele23d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk23d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay23d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 23d ago
Athlon10123d ago (Edited 23d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit22d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg22d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10122d ago (Edited 22d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14923d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
36d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_36d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle36d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit36d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog36d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog36d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad36d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_36d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage36d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda36d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

36d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)
40°

Sony Shows Off 20 Minutes of Crimson Desert on a Base PS5

Sony uploaded gameplay footage of Crimson Desert on a base PS5 running in what appears to be Quality Mode at a stable 30fps at 4K.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
BlazedKong62d ago

looks god awful on the base systems