610°

PlayStation 4: 13 Features required for Sony’s Triumphant come-back

Is Sony ready to offer what it takes for a triumphant come-back as the leader in Console game business ?

With so much speculation regarding the development of Next generation of consoles, it’s definitely worth considering what might be in store for us when it comes to Sony’s next big leap in the console business, the PlayStation 4.

These are quite possibly the most anticipated 13 features that every hardcore gamer desperately wants to be included in the Next generation Sony Console.

Read Full Story >>
animegenius.com
geniusgamerdoc5044d ago

For me all that matters is the Stable Framerate, Backward compatibility, HTML 5 Web browser and re-designed joystick.

5044d ago Replies(3)
5044d ago
CarlitoBrigante5044d ago

Lol reason 4:

"though Sony have been very successful in designing great looking consoles and Handhelds which are also very stable when it comes to sheer performance and durability, it’s really time for them to design a great design as well as to shove their habit of releasing a Slimmer version after a Couple of year down the road. Instead it would be better to design a slim console at launch itself without it becoming an afterthought."

Does this guy even know what he's talking about?! The point of releasing Slimmer versions of consoles is because it wasn't possible at launch. With components becoming cheaper and smaller they're able to make their console smaller. This guy probably thinks releasing Slim version years later is a marketing trick lol.

mewhy325044d ago

redesign the controller to be more like the xbox 360's, offer more developer friendly hardware design, redesign PSN to more resemble Xbox Live, do a major updrage to the Blu Ray drive's seek times and throughput.

sikbeta5044d ago

lol @ reason 4, yep, because it has nothing to do with the thing being designed to avoid heat problems at all (e_e)

Sarick5044d ago (Edited 5044d ago )

Redesign the controller? NO..
I disagree unless it has the option to chose what spot the hat/left analog is on. Meaning, you can move the analog to where the d-pad is or leave it whee L3 is on PS3.

This way gamers can choose where thy want the left analog vs forcing everyone into the same design.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5044d ago
Ulf5044d ago

"stable framerate" -- competely under the control of software, NOT hardware.

"Backward compatibility" -- I'm sure the PS3 will still be available, and not many people want to pay $100 extra for a feature they will rarely use.

"Re-designed joystick" -- the DualShock is the BEST controller in existence, and a LOT of PlayStation fans agree. The one, and ONLY thing better about, for example, the 360 controller, is the easy-to-use- triggers. If changing the curve of L2 & R2 somewhat, is what you mean, than I suppose I can agree.

sknygy5044d ago

To start with this article is poorly written.

"Sony are really good at making Controller compared any other controller till date."

Oh my!

Second of all, I have to disagree. I've always found the Dual Shock to be the least comfortable and definitely the least attractive controller, except perhaps the original Xbox. My favourite controller of all time, with regards to comfort, has to be the GameCube pad (or even WaveBird). It melted into your hands.
I'm probably going to get flamed for this, but my favourite controller for actual control style has to be the Wii Remote. FPS's have never been so enjoyable. :)

mcstorm5044d ago

For me sony need a new joypad design as its getting old now and its also too small for my hands. I think the only other things they should do are bring the console out at around £250 bring out lbp 3 lbp karting, uc4 gt6 and a new ms game all having full mp and party chat. They also need to make the updates quicker and installs quicker too. If you still have to install the games make sure it has at lest a 500gb hdd. If they do that plus keep what the ps3 now has it will sell well.

Looking at my psv sony are looking at doing that.

hiredhelp5044d ago

Youll never get stable framerate average trame rate differs per game..
USB 3.0 ha ha ok pointless but ok. Blue ray 100gb? You mean blue ray XL well apart from few games this gen thats used a 50gb blue ray notsure if its needed.
Dual hdmi for co-op was ot split screen eaither way at this point im wondering who wrote this..
8x AA well if you going there all i can hope for is console gamers get dx11.

BrunoM5044d ago

i like the ideas ... AS LONG AS THEY DONT MESS WTH MY DUALSHOCK3 lol....

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5044d ago
mathsman5044d ago

Put the analogue stick in the right place. More games use analogue than digital these days, why does digital still have priority placement?!

KUV19775044d ago

The 'right place' is kind of an opinion, isn't it? For me the sticks are in a perfect position. What you consider as 'the right' place couldn't be more wrong for me.

mathsman5044d ago

What, in the natural position that your thumb rests? Yeah, OK. ;)

KUV19775044d ago

I don't know about your hands but my thumbs feel pretty natural on the stick while still having great grip of the whole controller. Moving the thumb more to the upper left side of the controller would be way more cramp inducing for me and not natural at all. Still in the end i guess one could get used to it but for me it's really at an optimum the way it is.

Biggest5044d ago

"What, in the natural position that your thumb rests?"

I'm not sure about you, but human thumbs rest where they're placed. Care to explain why one human thumb should be placed differently than the other?

sikbeta5044d ago

IF you don't want the sticks to be changed, at least make them more comfortable, I want a bigger controller, the thing is made for kids and the L2+R2 pedal-buttons are annoying (hate them in GOW games), though useful in GT5 :D

JellyJelly5044d ago

@KUV1977 - Ergonomically correct/incorrect isn't an opinion.

gamingdroid5044d ago

@JellyJelly

I agree. To the vast majority of people, ergonomic isn't preferential. It just is!

One might prefer to sit slouching, but it certainly isn't ergonomic!

KUV19775043d ago

No, it certainly is not but I would like to see the study that proves the analogue stick on the upper left to be more ergonomic than in the position it is right now. Just because some people feel that it is more ergonomic doesn't mean it is automatically the truth. And unless there is objective proof for the better position it remains an opinion.
Just try the controller in your hand and place the thumb on the controllers as they are right now. Then try it on the digital pad and then watch your thumb as you do. The position as it is right now seems much more relaxed to me. And it feels also as if you could play much longer in that position - actually personal case studies have proven that I can play in that position for hours without fatigue or cramps. But notice how I use the word 'seems' as I can not speak for all of human kind as it is just the way I feel and as long as you don't have real proof that the thumb stick in any other position is more ergonomic I suggest you don't use 'absolute facts' like that and call whatever you prefer your opinion until backed up by proof.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5043d ago
SandwichHammock5044d ago

I second that, the placement and the controller are perfect for me, but then again I grew up with the Playstation. The only stab I have against the controllers is the quality. There is a huge difference in the controllers from the original FATs to the ones that are available now. Obvious shoddy plastic is obvious.

As for the article. I didn't know Sony needed a comeback. To what does this relate: sales? market share? pants?

The only "features" I want in the next playstation (for all next gen consoles for that matter) is better physics and the TOTAL elimination of any type of pop in, be it texture or geometry.

Back to my morning bagel.

Cheers.

Tonester9255044d ago

Maybe put more weight into the controllers. Hmmm Gun Metal controllers?

xRyan5044d ago

Sony needs to reinvent their online gaming comment with the PS4 ... come close to Xbox Live will give them more hardware sales.

TheUnbiasedLion5044d ago

There is nothign wrong with sony's online gaming. Plus the fact that it is free is a real winner for me.

I do like my XBL but tbh PSN wins overal litrally cause its free and offers basically the same experience.

CarlitoBrigante5044d ago

PSN is all I need, I dont want to pay 60 dollaz to play online function of my purchased game.

All Sony needs to do is revamp the XMB so its more social friendly. The Vita storted it out, it even has X game chat.

RememberThe3575044d ago

Though you got swamped with disagrees by overly sensitive fanboys, your right. Sony has been working on their network to get it on the level of Live. Ask any Sony employee and they'll tell you that Live is a more interactive platform, maybe not "better" but it has more interactive features. The next gen is going to need to be even more interactive and Sony is going to need to capitalize on that to recapture the 50 million people they lost to the 360.

Sony has the games (for the most part), but next gen they really need to show that they have the network and the OS to help people connect and interact. The more you can tear down the walls space puts between us the more popular your product will be.

And in my honest opinion all the people who claim they don't want anything more than what they have now are out of their minds. Not only that but Sony will deliver on everything these people claim they don't want and they'll act like they never knew how they lived without it.

xRyan5044d ago

Its glad to see someone who knows what they are talking about. PSN is good, but currently it cannot compete with Xbox Live. Sony needs to reinvent their online network with more features so that they can get back the core online players. If they do that, PS4 sales will be so much greater than PS3, and Xbox 360. Sony has the games, and the hardware ... they just need a better online community ... even if we have to pay for it.

Fanboys will be fanboys, so no arguing with them. They will disagree with you also even though you talk the truth.

DragonKnight5044d ago

If someone didn't get a PS3 because it has one or two less features than Live, they didn't want the console to begin with. PSN doesn't have to compete with Live since it offers pretty much everything Live does, is easy to navigate, and is free. PSN only has to compete with itself and do things on its own. If you think core gamers aren't happy with PSN, then you're speaking for people you shouldn't be and you're not paying attention.

Would more features be good. Sure. Are they crucial? Not by a long shot. A gaming console shouldn't be more like a PC when its main purpose is playing games. I don't need facebook to play games, I don't need 3901248712390482374 different chat features to play games, and that's just a fact.

BitbyDeath5044d ago

They already did it on the Vita so no doubt that'll carry over to the PS4 as well.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5044d ago
Disccordia5044d ago

They are already on the right path. Just need some slight changes to that controller and invest heavily on creating a quality operating system and they are pretty much set.

Sharingan_no_Kakashi5044d ago

Next Gen consoles are gonna be so freaking powerful. Just looking at the WII U you can tell. It can do 1080p at 60fps so you know the next xbox and ps4 are gonna go higher than that. Even the new Ipad can produce resolutions higher than HD tv's and it's portable O.o. The next generation consoles are gonna be bleeding edge. Talking about 4k resolutions and 300 fps. TV's are just barely getting there but of course sony will use the ps4 as a trojan horse to get those new tv's into people's living rooms.

limewax5044d ago

lol really? 4k rez at 300FPS? would that be with games in DX11?

You do realise you would need something like this to make that possible right?

http://www.cray.com/Product...

Seriously I have no idea where you get the idea of 4k at 300FPS from. You think your eyes would even be able to register a full 300FPS?

Sharingan_no_Kakashi5044d ago

the current generations of consoles (which is 7 years old) highest resolution is over 2million pixels. The new Ipad's resolution is over 3million and it's a freaking portable. Technology moves faster than people care to realize. There are already cameras that support 4k resolution videos (they're expensive as heck but they exist. Sony just shipped there $65k true 4k camera in January). Youtube currently is the only website that hosts 4k resolution videos. By the time next generation starts the cost of the tech will have dropped. And even if they don't use true 4k res there is still "fake" 4k or even 2k. But it's gonna happen.

I_am_Batman5044d ago (Edited 5044d ago )

What the ...? Again this 4k thing. Now once and for all: That's not gonna happen. Do you even know how much processing power you need to render 300fps in 4k? It means the graphic processor needs to render over 12,000,000 pixel 300 times a second. It would need a 30 times more powerful processor to do that than to render 1080p in 60fps with the same details. 4k TV's make no sense for home usage. You would only see a difference if the TV has an over 60" display.

I agree that we need at least 60fps standard if we want to see high quality 3d games in the next generation. But there is no need to go beyond 1080p. It would just be a waste of processing power which could be used for a lot of fantastic things instead.

Sharingan_no_Kakashi5044d ago

what the heck are you talking about. Youtube already hosts 4k resolutions on their website. There are already cameras out there that can record in 4k. Prolly not at 300fps but then again they're portable.

RyuCloudStrife5044d ago

PS4 will do that I'm so certain of it I'm willing to pay cash. You think the PS3 was a supercomputer? The PS4 will be beyond imagining I CANNOT FUCKING WAIT~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

limewax5044d ago

I normally wouldn't respond to such a comment but just so you know, supercomputers are humongous, much bigger than a PC, or a TV, in fact you would have trouble fitting one in your living room. So no, no Sony product is or ever will be a supercomputer.

I love Sony products but seriously people, you need to brush up on tech before commenting about it

AKA5044d ago

woW how low standart pc nerds have im ashame of them 4k is the next big thing and sony will go for it.
disagree all you want if that helps you to sleep happy but they have already show 4k tv and even gt4 was running on it at 4k resolition or near it..

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5044d ago
Show all comments (98)
80°

RAM Price Increases Could See Next-Generation Console Releases Delayed

Insider Gaming has learned that the ongoing price increases in RAM due to the rise in AI could delay the next generation of console releases.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
17d ago
slate9117d ago

What is even the incentive of upgrading to the next-gen after this console generation we've had? Graphics are plateauing, prices at an all time high, studios skipping entire generations or simply releasing just one game for it...
Its a mess

Jin_Sakai17d ago

Been gaming all my life. This is the worst generation ever.

jznrpg17d ago

How do you gauge each generation? There has been a lot of really good games this gen. I only care about the games. First party hasn’t been the best but the generation isn’t over yet

DarXyde17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

jznrpg,

Thing is, every generation before this one has had something that defined console identity. Very little beyond bigger/more detailed games and performance modes are really there.

I feel the last generation that cared very much was gen 7; Capcom's darkest era, but I have to give them props for being really experimental at the time. We saw plenty of new games that still tried to do something new. Outside of Metaphor and Clair Obscur, this gen has been pretty forgettable if you ask me. I'm sure a lot of it is the corporatization of the industry and the creative talent has to keep making sequels and spiritual successors because the cost of development is out of control. But even then, plenty of these experiences are experiences we've had already. And the thing is. Switch 2 and PSVR2 could really be doing incredible things, but it's just not there. Xbox I just don't see the value or point anymore but that's just me.

anast17d ago

Why has is been the worst? I've been gaming all my life and this gen. has been one of the best.

Vits17d ago

Not to mention that just like this generation, the next one will also be shared between the current and next gen console at least for a couple of years. So the few titles that it will had, just like this one, will run on the console you already have.

franwex16d ago

We will be getting games on PS4, PS5, and PS6, haha.

Extermin8or3_16d ago

I think people have to remember the pandemic at start of this gen and how it effected game development. This next gen we will see the PS4 etc support dropped and truly see the full utilisation of SSD's improvements to ray and path tracing and the impact of AI upscaling etc will be where the biggest improvements will come from.

isarai_lee16d ago

My sentiments exactly, next gen has got to prove it's worth before i buy into it this time. This has been the weakest generation in my 30yrs of gaming. From the drawn out cross gen garbage, to so many games getting stuck in development hell or canceled, to the ABSURD levels of trend chasing to the point of self destruction, this gen just wasn't worth it

thorstein16d ago

I'm pretty sure I've already read a story that said Playstation is only halfway through this console's generation and that PS6 is a way off.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 16d ago
darthv7217d ago

Im good with next gen being pushed back to 27/28. It feels like this gen has only just begun.

Melankolis17d ago

Covid-19 held back everything at least 2 years worth. Although many people disliked, i think only UE5 can generally distinguish this gen from the previous one.

DarXyde16d ago

UE5 is definitely impressive, but I would also give the nod to the current version of Decima, at least the way it looks for Death Stranding 2.

CornholioX16d ago

That's normal how you think. Time goes faster when you're older and i bought my PS5 since day 1 release and now it's 5 years old. I don't mind a year delay to release PS6 in holiday 2028.

DoubleYourDose16d ago

Tomorrow isn't promised to any of us.

Eonjay16d ago

I was under the impression that next gen wasn't coming till 2027.z u9gsq

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 16d ago
victorMaje17d ago

Regardless of RAM price increases, I strongly believe there’s still a lot of potential left for the current gen. I’d be fine with at least 3 more years.

jznrpg17d ago

Whenever it comes out is fine with me. I still have backlog for the next year at least

Show all comments (38)
120°

Bad Robot Games Teams With Sony

This is interesting and unexpected news as Sony and Bad Robot Games are partnering.

-Foxtrot43d ago

Was excited until I saw “an unannounced four-player, cooperative shooter”

Christopher43d ago

It's from the same guy who made L4D. Wouldn't expect anything otherwise.

-Foxtrot43d ago

I just thought since Back 4 Blood didn’t set the world on fire and died pretty quickly support wise he might have done something a little different.

StoneTitan42d ago

awesome, cooperative games are great

Scissorman42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

@Foxtrot The creator of L4D, Mike Booth, didn't have anything to do with Back for Blood, and that's probably why it didn't set the world on fire. This new project just might be the successor we've been waiting for.

JEECE42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

Gosh it would be so nice to have a true successor to L4D 2. Back 4 Blood introduced nearly every annoying, unnecessary aspect of multiplayer game design from the last ten-ish years, while simultaneously making the gameplay and world less interesting than L4D. Ironically I think it didn't actually have MTs, despite feeling like it was designed to sell them.

Sadly, I just can't see a true successor coming out now. I'd happily be wrong, but I bet this will have a hub world, multiple progression systems, multiple currency systems, skins, heros/operators/specialists, and battle passes, and the speed of the game will be toned down from L4D2, just like B4B was.

Whitey2k42d ago

I shall keep an eye on this. Expecially if Mike booth is involved Left for dead 1 & 2 was amazing on pc.

Should be left for dead 3

More enemies and boss battles
More maps and missions
Also bring back like the witch and tank and other nasty top dogs

JEECE42d ago

The "PC" feel is one of the key reasons B4B doesn't match up to L4D. L4D is clearly designed for mouse and keyboard, and the speed of the game reflects that (this is why it never felt quite right on 360 and the devs had to add in that "quick turn" feature to compensate). Meanwhile B4B is slowed down to better suit playing with controllers. Unfortunately this game will likely be the same, given the PS5 version.

And yes you are right the specials were so lame in B4B compared to L4D.

Whitey2k40d ago

That's because the 360 didnt support mouse and keyboard. Now we're in that era ps5 or ps6 and magnus should easily support mouse and keyboard to play with pc players

JEECE38d ago

@Whitey2k

Technically consoles support m/k now, but practically speaking most console users still just play with a controller, so this game is likely to be designed primarily with controller players in mind. I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but I doubt I will be.

160°

Sony: PS5 Is “Only in the Middle of Its Journey;” Multiplatform Helldivers 2 Doing “Extremely Well”

During Sony’s quarterly financial conference call CFO Lin Tao provided relevant information on the performance of the PlayStation business.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Pedantic9166d ago

Kinda figured the lifecycle for this gen and for Sony in particular will be longer, stronger hardware with better graphical enhancements is not going to show immediate jump in quality for games anymore like in the 90's, graphics have since plateaued and what they should be pushing for is art design, physics handling and locking down framerates to 60fps as the absolute minimum required. Sony will always have their 1st party with their heavy hitters but i would also personally want to see them invest more into AA, bring in younger talents, incorporate more experimental ideas to game design and prototyping like the early days with PS and PS2, maybe instead of investing 200-300+ million in bombastic cinematic experiences, invest atleast half of that into creating new teams for other genres you're currently lacking in to diversify your portfolio such as platfomers, jrpgs, horror, rythm, arcade racer, FPS, hell, maybe even a strategy game or two.

thorstein66d ago

What I've learned from this generation is that smaller studios are where I'm finding the best games.

The big boys just aren't cutting it.

This is great news for PS owners.

But what's the advantage to new hardware anymore? It's like cell phones. There's noting new or innovative. All the future tech isn't arriving any time soon: quantum computers and internet.

Profchaos66d ago

What I've learnt from this gen is to go retro until you get those big games like GTA Vi

Lightning7766d ago

People seem to complain whenever Sony does something different. If it's not the cinematic story driven games then most don't seem to care.

I forgot what game it was but We remember when Shawn Layden said some game didn't sell all that well but it was ok because they wanted to take chances with new types of games. That was a different times different generation now. What applies then certainly doesn't apply now.

PhillyDonJawn66d ago

Not necessarily. Ps5 could still be supported for years after ps6 release. I still would expect ps6 around 2027

MetroidFREAK2166d ago

As long as proper physical games keep coming out for PS5, I'll keep supporting it

Eonjay65d ago

At this point, going back and seeing just how incredible and soawling the PS4 library is, its nice to see that the PS5 will wind up just as good with continued physical support into the next decade and the full PS4 physical catalog as well.

MetroidFREAK2164d ago

I agree. I'm still picking up PS4 games I missed back in the day as well.

MIDGETonSTILTS1766d ago

New hardware is meant to expand possibilities for developers when their ambitions are constrained.

Looking at Death Stranding 2 and Yotei, and anticipating GTA6 and Wolverine will also blow away graphics expectations, I don’t think devs are constrained by the ps5 yet.

The longer they wait to release the ps6, the stronger it will be. People can wait. Just let Kojima finish Physint as a ps6 launch title. That should take at least another 4 years. That would be the lifecycle at 9 years, which would be the longest lifecycle yet, but not by much.

Eonjay65d ago

So I totally see what you are saying but I suspect that one of the effects of introducing stronger hardware is the older generations are then maxed by necessity.

But thats just my opinion. The real reason why Sony won't wait to release a next Gen console is because they are seeking to directly influence the next Gen of graphics hardware on an industry wide scale.. To them, they are making developers lives easier if they are developing for hardware that ubiquitous support features across platforms including PC.

This would literally lift everyone up at the same time. And for this reason the Next Playstation will debut as part of UDNAs debut. PS5 will continue to be optimized and supported for another 5 at least.

MIDGETonSTILTS1763d ago

If I’m following you, you are saying introducing a ps6 would be a way to immediately hit the PS5’s hardware ceiling. That would make sense, but I hope they force Xbox to release their console first, and they then counter with a slightly stronger ps6 a year later. I don’t expect Xbox to launch with a strong initial exclusives roster that would necessitate Sony being first to market.

Dexterio66d ago

Sony: PS5 Is “Only in the Middle of Its Journey;”
Nice to know. I wouldn't worry about PS6 for another 5-6 years, I guess.

monkey60266d ago

I wouldnt count on that. A console life cycle doesn't end with the announcement and release of a new gen.
We'll see a PS6 announcement in 2027 and release in 2028. I could bet on it

Eonjay65d ago

It could come out in 2027 and thats fine. It is quite common for people to upgrade their TV, phone or PC within that time period. As long as it is backwards compatible it makes total sense to upgrade and its justified on its merit alone. There is no reason why this can apply to consoles too.

jznrpg66d ago

I doubt it will be that long until PS6. My guess is around 2028 but who knows. Could be as early as holiday 27’ and as late as 29 but I can’t see it being any farther than that. I somewhat doubt as late as 29. Half way through PS5 life can also mean crossgen titles for a year or 2 into PS6

Lightning7766d ago

The rumor is 2027. Cerny said it's only a few years away. Possibly of 2028 but it definitely won't be 5, 6 years away.

isarai66d ago

With this statement, while Mark Cerby us teasing the basis of the next gen tech, it sounds like we're probably going to have another dragged out cross gen overlap 😒 ugh. I miss the days when launch ganes marked the starting line of new beginnings, games built from the ground up to take full advantage of whats new and exciting, instead of just upresed/remastered last gen games

Show all comments (19)