All Channels
Popular
70°

Does Nintendo Need to "Evolve"?

Lots of talk keeps pouring in from GDC about Nintendo's Wii U not really being what the company needs to truly step into next-gen gaming. Does Nintendo need to ditch its current way of doing things to catch up with the rest of the crowd?

Read Full Story >>
zeldainformer.com
tantobanto5182d ago (Edited 5182d ago )

And since when has analyst talk been right about nintendo? EVER

oh and nobody wants elder scrolls or mass effect.................you see those meta user scores? abysmal ( a point finished later on)

And since when is fire emblem casual? is mario casual? or zelda? not really? they cater to the hardcore

internet trolling is as bad as its ever been ( point ended)...............

like I said before, the 3ds is number 1 in the world. People cant hate it that much

jc485735182d ago

I will say it again. It's the gamers or customers that need to evolve.

ThePsychoGamer5182d ago

They certainly could benefit from adobting some modern trends.

PopRocks3595181d ago

Oh like, downloadable demos, online multiplayer and fully functional online infrastructure? Like what the Wii U will offer? And what the 3DS is slowly beginning to utilize?

ThePsychoGamer5181d ago

Case and point, though don't forget making Region free systems.

Shok5182d ago

They have.

Nobody's noticed how they're getting 3rd party support back?

Heard about the Nintendo Network?

A touchscreen controller seems like an evolution to me.

mike1up5182d ago (Edited 5182d ago )

Lmao. Must be another slow news day over at Zeldainformer.

We all know what it is, Troll journalism/analysis. It's not personal. It's similar to an toddler acting out for attention.

Instead of informing gamers, these analyst are encouraged/provoked to make rash and stupid comments to get a response. It's truly pathetic because the sites that post garbage like this for hits are equally guilty.

Show all comments (22)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7745d ago (Edited 45d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer70d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi69d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer70d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot70d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box70d ago (Edited 70d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno70d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay70d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno68d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK69d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)