All Channels
Popular
240°

Graphics Are a Crutch

I feel that games tend to take a dive as graphics advance. Of course, there are many titles that can handle gameplay and graphics quite well. Yet, it is not a common occurrence. It tends to be one or the other in most cases. Graphics seem to mask most games and hide their true potential. It is a setup of self deception that even I fall for at times. The problem, for me, is that I can’t play graphics. With such heavy emphasis in that department, games are no doubt suffering.

Read Full Story >>
defaultprime.com
Orpheus5208d ago

The writer of this article has gone nuts. Its true it takes a lot of resources to invest in graphics but compared to the games of the 1990s the competition in the graphics department has not increased much. At that time no game could have the graphics crown for more than a year. Crysis held the crown for around 3 years didn't it.

2012 may be nice for graphics but else the last few years have been a lil dull in the graphics department.

christheredhead5208d ago

Actually, I was the writer of the article and no I have not gone nuts haha. Graphics haven't been advancing drastically year to year, but the focus is still overwhelming. "Our game has the best graphics on console." "We pushed the limit of what is possible." So on and so fourth. I see those statements repeated over and over seen this generation has started. Yet, the same games that carry such bold claims are almost always lacking in content, design, longevity or a mix of everything.

Good graphics are fine. They just seem to take away from the experience when its supposed to draw you in. The HD era has definitely caused games to suffer in more ways than one. Some games do encompass greatness all around, but overall it tends to be one or the other, in most cases.

Orpheus5208d ago

Oh bro sorry :D ur not nuts for sure. Apologies.

WitWolfy5208d ago

An engine I always loved till this day is SCUMM, where it it was all about art style like The Curse of Monkey Island.

Too bad they dont make games like those anymore.

Kthalas5204d ago

Nice article man. I agree with you on it.

I see a lot of posters who base their gaming decisions off of Graphics. If the game in question has what they consider to be bad graphics, they won't pick it up. They also won't pick up older classics that have great stories and game play because the graphics are "dated".

Graphics are nice. They're like eye candy. But without substance, that's all it is. Eye Candy.

dark-hollow5208d ago

Developers, get this,
Graphics gets outdated over the years but a good art style is what truly will lives on for generations.

Many developers focus on graphics but their art style is very dull and boring.
That's why wind waker still looks good even by today's standards.

dedicatedtogamers5208d ago

Graphics are one of the things being advanced the LEAST. Nowadays, devs focus so much effort into storylines (most of which end up being crappy) and online features. Physics and graphics are one of the main ways that videogames progress.

When you have 25 enemies on the screen instead of just 2, isn't that an advancement in graphics?

When you shoot a wood beam, it splinters, and a building comes tumbling down, isn't that an advancement in physics?

When you can actually walk across a landscape with hills, forests, rocks, and valleys instead of walking across a flat mini-map, isn't that graphics?

When you can see damage and blood on your enemy instead of relying on a generic health bar to see how much damage, they've taken, isn't that graphics?

christheredhead5208d ago (Edited 5208d ago )

"Graphics are one of the things being advanced the LEAST. Nowadays, devs focus so much effort into storylines (most of which end up being crappy) and online features. Physics and graphics are one of the main ways that videogames progress."

-True. At this very point in time, on this day, yes graphics are being advanced the least. They have been developed enough that they aren't being pushed so heavily on every single occasion. Yet, there are expectations that people rely on so predominantly that makes me wonder. Gamers flock to what is shiny because it looks good. Wii, for instance, is the obvious underdog in the visuals. Some gamers refuse to play it because it looks "so hourendous", among a culmination of other things. Same instance is applied to other games outside of the Wii library.

As, for the rest of your questions you are right, I'm not arguing or trying to downplay graphics. The HD generation has ruined many franchises for me though. Some are completely non existent. Which, like I said, there is a certain expectation that must be met. If any thing falls short it will automatically be a terrible game. "Game looks horrible, I'm not playing it." "Wow, this looks amazing. This is next generation good." My example of BF3 sums up how I feel. Yes, the game looks great, but I feel like so much emphasis was put onto the visuals that the rest of game suffered for it. Yet, gamers feed into it, hyping the game into something it was not. It's a great game, just not what is was being made up to be. This was implied by the visual standard. Similar situation for most games.

dedicatedtogamers5208d ago

IMO that has less to do with graphics being a "crutch" and more to do with most devs these days lacking the talent to make a game with good graphics AND good gameplay. Yep, a lot of gamers look to graphics. Part of that is because - "back in the day" - great graphics almost ALWAYS meant great gameplay because only the most talented developers could manage to push graphics.

christheredhead5208d ago

Agreed. I'm not trying to knock graphics, just the over emphasis on visual quality. True It might be the devs fault, but if they can't manage both, what do you think they would fall back on? The visuals of course, and that's what I mean by crutch. You'll see that the game looks great and you might be suckered into purchasing or playing it. Publishers use it as a tool many times.

The main point of the article though was the inclination of next gen. If you apply the ideals of this current gen to the next then prepare for a boring round of consoles. I mean, gamers gauge the worthiness of consoles and games just on graphics alone. I dont expect next gen to be any thing more than a prettier version of this gen. That is, if they appeal to what most people want. You can already get a good idea of the mentality of most just by reading the comments relating to the samaritan demo.

Baka-akaB5208d ago

I feel it is yet again some recurrent case of nostalgia .

Graphics werent less important in some distant golden era , or else we'd have come that far along that quickly .

"Gamers flock to what is shiny because it looks good. Wii, for instance, is the obvious underdog in the visuals. Some gamers refuse to play it because it looks "so hourendous", among a culmination of other things. Same instance is applied to other games outside of the Wii library"

The wii has been the underdog in far more than graphics . It has been in every area so far except sales .

It is because of a mix of both it's archaic hardware , but also of it's lack of 3rd party support while relying on a widely underused control gimmick .

How many open world game do you even know on wii as opposed to how many shovelwares ? And how many of the best wii titles arent from nintendo itself ?

And how many of the truly great Wii titles dont have some distinct artistic and graphical qualities ? I think you'd only find wii sports in such list alongside stuff like zelda SS , Last Story , Mario Galaxy , Xenoblade etc

"Yep, a lot of gamers look to graphics. Part of that is because - "back in the day" - great graphics almost ALWAYS meant great gameplay because only the most talented developers could manage to push graphics. "

this ^^ , except i dont think it's something "back in the day" .

Do we even remember any time lately a great looking game had mediocre gameplay ? And i'm not talking dissapointment after months of media hype , but truly subpar gameplay .

I dont think we can find a game these days that would look gorgeous and play like crap . The cost is too big for any studio to even pull that . And people know and notice that hence why they by default and association follow graphics .

Even a dissapointed Crysis fan , can't pretend Crysis 2 is awful .

Capt-FuzzyPants5208d ago (Edited 5208d ago )

Amen to that. This guy's speakin the truth.

WiiUWiime5208d ago

U hav to remmbr to that good graphics doesnt always mean good framerates!!! I would rather hav a decent lookin game with smooth framerates than a great looking game that suffers from framedrops and slowdown...u guys know what i mean...

theeg5208d ago

there has benn no focus on graphics on consoles since uncharted 2, since no console game since has look as good, consoles peaked with uncharted 2, until new ones come out, graphics are the least thing they can focus on, since the consoles are not capable of anything beyond uncharted 2, in fact games are starting to look worse, like uncharted 3, not even close to uncharted 2.

christheredhead5208d ago

I think I remember God of War 3 and Killzone 3 being "maxed out." Both are great games, but for being "maxed out" they lacked a major amount of content. They turned out to be grossly underwhelming, at least for me. There was very little depth as they took a 'more is less' sort of approach to the user experience.

WitWolfy5208d ago

I still think people take "MAXED OUT" out of context, when the developer actually means they maxed out ENGINE X on the current hardware they're running on.

Optimization is the key I think.

hiredhelp5207d ago

God of war 3 had graphics, longativity,replayability,and unlockable game modes witch many games lack this gen..

christheredhead5207d ago (Edited 5207d ago )

@hiredhelp

I would have to agree to disagree. I bought the game on launch day and beat the game in five and half hours. Granted, I wasn't rushing nor did I mean to beat it that fast. Afterwards you have the challenge modes and that is about it. Not much to it really. Sure I could go back and play it on hard to artifically extend the experience, but I don't see the point. Lastly, they decided to cut out all the unlockable content that you would have normally got with past installments. Instead of really great creative costumes, like the fish suit, you were treated to a few and the rest were up for sale as DLC.

That 5 hour experience I had was absolutely amazing, but it was underwhelming. I spent 65 dollars on a game I beat the same day that I picked up. Worst purchase in a very long time. It offered nothing outside your main story. Nothing wrong with that, but God of War 3 does not encompass what games lack. It is actually the prime example of the what current gen games lack. The game went for cinematics and graphics leaving the rest of the aspects behind.

Show all comments (22)
80°

Battlefield 3 Cut Missions From Campaign Detailed by Former DICE Dev

Battlefield 3's former Lead Designer has revealed that there were two cut missions from the main campaign

XiNatsuDragnel502d ago

I wish someone can get those EA game leaks to see all the cut content ngl

anast501d ago

Get rid of campaigns, move the game to mobile, and try to compete with warzone. They would save time and money.

Johnh5223501d ago (Edited 501d ago )

Bf4 was fun hope the new bf is just as good.

50°

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III & Warzone - Season 6 Combat Pack Trailer

Free for Playstation owners

210°

Modern Warfare 3 flooded with cheaters after arrival on Xbox Game Pass

Players are using hacks to gain an advantage in the game, such as aimbots and wall hacks. The first gives a player superhuman aiming abilities, while a wall hack lets you see through walls to gauge where other players are.

Read Full Story >>
standard.co.uk
Jin_Sakai663d ago (Edited 663d ago )

“These hacks are typically used by PC players, but those playing on PC via Xbox Game Pass are identified as Xbox players in multiplayer lobbies.”

This is pretty dumb to say the least.

Cacabunga662d ago

All about them headshots for Xbox

badz149662d ago

Gotta pump those numbers up

blackblades662d ago

That's a WTF, they suppose to be labeled as pc users even if its on PC game pass. They mess that up big time.

XiNatsuDragnel663d ago

Oh bad this will be entertaining to watch

ZycoFox662d ago

If AI keeps getting better (and it will) it's just a matter of time before there's more sophisticated cheats even for consoles, and they wouldn't even need to be running on it, I have little doubt about that.

lelo2play663d ago

Don't Gamepass online games have anti-cheat systems?
If not, that's pretty dumb. Microsoft need to fix that asap.

Rynxie662d ago (Edited 662d ago )

They won't ever fix this problem, unless they (developers, publishers, Sony and MS) go after the cheat providers directly. You no longer need to hack consoles to use hacks. During the ps360 days, they were going after cheat devices, but it was a cat and mouse game. These cheating methods were around during those days, it's nothing new, but they kept it under control. Since the PS4/Xbox one generation, they stopped going after these cheating devices and it became widespread. Which I find odd, since they started charging for online play (PS4).

StormSnooper662d ago (Edited 662d ago )

Possibly, this is because the companies were going after cheats because the same cheats were being used to pirate the games, whereas today, the companies use online verification to prevent piracy, thus eliminating the need to go after people who cheat only to gain an advantage in the game. As long as the cheater remains below the radar, and does not completely break the game, the companies look the other way as their wallets are not threatened by it. (that is my completely Uneducated opinion on the matter)

pwnmaster3000662d ago

I mean, COD games was always filled with hackers, nothing new. I can’t blame MS on this. Activision had years to try and fix this. Might take MS some time to make some change.

Rude-ro662d ago

It all depends…
Microsoft’s guidance on how to handle gamepass on pc and their love to force crossplay with pc seems like a them issue.
And they own activision, so it is still a them issue.

StormSnooper662d ago

lol well that sucks.

Is there a reason this happened upon arrival on xbox?

Show all comments (19)