All Channels
Popular
890°

360 successor features tablet-like controller with HD screen, touch-enabled

Magazine makes new claims about Microsoft's new console, specifically relating to its controller.

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
Titanz5207d ago (Edited 5207d ago )

And they shall come.

dark-hollow5207d ago

does any wild rumor gets approved here on n4g?

da_2pacalypse5206d ago

This isn't that wild considering how much time M$ is investing in windows8... Plus they're always looking to "blur the lines" between x and y.... I don't see why this wouldn't be their next project... I personally wont buy it, even as a primary 360 gamer.

aCasualGamer5206d ago

Would be cool if they implemented a light version of Windows 8 on their next Xbox.

Have seen some videos of Windows 8 and it looks really cool. Simplified as hell, but still cool looking. They have to simplify it though, otherwise Apple will continue to run them over.

ljh2175206d ago

And I think controllers are expensive now..

A_Forsaken_User5206d ago

Is that even a question that needs to be answered?

milohighclub5206d ago

"with a shape closer to Sony’s sleek Vita handheld / Apple’s iPad"

So which is? These 2 devices look nothing a like.

Doubt it's true, or at least doubt it's mandatory.

If it is then this plus not playing used games pretty much means I will not be purchasing.

tehpees35206d ago

Sounds to me like these new Xbox rumours are getting out of hand.

nveenio5206d ago

I can't see Microsoft alienating their core audience so drastically. But, then again, they've never been the smartest of companies when it comes to customer experience.

Mystogan5206d ago

@inveni0

im gonna have to argue with that.

microsoft has been very focused on customer experience these years, you only have to look at windows 8,windows phone 7 and the new xbox dashboard to see that.

JANF5206d ago

Fake, look and the touch pad, bad photoshop job. Look all blurry and crap in comparison with the rest of the page.

Brock Danger5206d ago

Agree on this being fake.

Right off the bat, 'matt' is misspelled, as far as I know it's only spelled 'matte.' Don't see a mistake like that getting by spellcheck, let alone an editor.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5206d ago
darthv725207d ago

this article says. If anything i do believe that the new windows 8 will play a more direct role in the cross play between pc, mobile and console gaming.

Yet if there is a tablet involved it may serve two purposes. One being an interface for more windows based computing and the 2nd would be as a direct console interface between the user and the tv.

not like the wii-u though but AS the console itself. Meaning you dock the unit to a tv and pick up a controller to play. Its an idea but one that could prove to be very near in the future. Your portable/mobile doubles as the console and vice versa.

all it takes is the right backing from hardware and software developers.

sikbeta5207d ago

Rumors hint

Next Xbox -> codename: infinity -> ∞ = 8 = W8

Finch5206d ago

To be honest I love this idea. Home console and on the go.

adorie5207d ago

post a worthless article to garner worthless fanboy opinions
and they shall come.

SilentNegotiator5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

Microsoft succeeded by releasing the next flavor of the month (Kinect - hint: "Flavor of the Month" is just an expression), stealing Wii's casual thunder. Simply doing what Nintendo is doing would be very foolish on their end.

A tablet-controller console will never have the same impact as the Wii. The Wii was about being accessible to everyone with at least one hand, and being the next trendy way to supposedly lose weight and stay active (without leaving the front of a television set).

morkendo235206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

and NINTENDO say: ouch!!! why do you guys (SONY & MICROSOFT) like to bite my ass so much.
aaaaaaaagghhhhhhhh!!!

xtremeimport5206d ago

Build it, and i'll pass.
the Wii-U already looks retarded thanks to its controller.

Rageanitus5206d ago

@inveni0

just look at kinect they already alienated their early adopters......

Just look at how fast they dropped support of the orignal xbox......

And ppl still support them blindly.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5206d ago
Amazingmrbrock5207d ago

Must...copy... nintendo... aaaaagghhhh

PamPoovey5207d ago

Didn't it come out that Sony was looking into motion control (Move) before the Wii was revealed.....

kneon5207d ago

Yup, the first patents were filed over 10 years ago

Machioto5207d ago (Edited 5207d ago )

Other than looks to an extent I don't see how the move is a copy because going by tech demos,Sony showed of stuff that seemed either game related that out did anything Nintendo showed or just cool stuff like their rts demo,the minority report style demo,sculpting demo and it is accurate.

sikbeta5207d ago

Funny thing, in gaf an article appeared showing how Sony has a patent for a tablet like controller that was filed in 2010, so it's not like one company is super revolutionary and the others just copy/paste, pretty much all companies have the same ideas, though the first to apply is the winner, well if it turns out to be good :P

ZippyZapper5207d ago

Achievments
HD console
Live

SweatyFlorida5207d ago

And Kinect is a big version of the Playstation Eye

CommonSense5206d ago

Yeah, they patented technology for things like 6-axis. Move is a blatent rip off.

But sony supporters will say and do ANYTHING to spin any information about the playstation brand to sound good. that's sort of what they do.

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF5206d ago

Ya, and Trophies were copied from Achievements.

See how easy it is?

MySwordIsHeavenly5206d ago

Actually, many games had "achievements" years before even the first Xbox came out. :) Microsoft was just the first company to make it a universal service.

kneon5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

@CommonSense

No, Sony patented the Move wand complete with ball, orientation sensors and camera July 21, 2000

http://www.google.com/paten...

They have a number of other related patents from around the same time frame but this one has nice diagrams that even the most delusional would have to admit look like the basic concept of the Move wand.

No spin required, unless you believe that the US patent office colluded with Sony to falsify patent submissions by backdating them. And if you believe that then you need some psychiatric care.

hellztourguide4205206d ago

Actually i'm pretty sure Nintendo's Power Glove was the first...sorry Sony. And besides...if Sony patented it first, which is true, then why did it take them so long to bring it out? They were afraid to take the chance...Nintendo took it, and it has obviously paid off money wise.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5206d ago
darthv725207d ago

every company since nintendo has been copying them. Before nintendo there was Atari. Which company would you rather follow?

room4145206d ago

Practically everything nintendo has done had already been done before. Usually by much smaller obscure companies.

wii controller for example: http://www.youtube.com/watc...

fei-hung5207d ago

Im sure microsoft were playing about with touch screen technology way before nintendo or even apple for that matter with microsoft surface and if they launch a tablet they will do a better job than Sony unless Sony too intergrate a good tablet with the next playstation. I petsonally would love this as it will be like buying 2 products in one.

blumatt5206d ago

The only thing is the controllers would be prohibitively expensive.

ConstipatedGorilla5206d ago

I actually hope they do because it will put PS4 in a much better position. All the hardcore gamers would migrate toward PS4 and we'd see a lot of really great stuff on it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5206d ago
360GamerFG5207d ago

Believing everything you read
Naive.

Knight_Cid5207d ago

I am responding to this article. I did not say I believed it

gamingdroid5207d ago (Edited 5207d ago )

Ignore Knight_Cid , as this account is 10-days old and been trolling down to three bubbles soon to be one I'm sure....

hellvaguy5207d ago

Just like how nintendo is copying sony/ms and focusing online this time. Or how they copied the competition and moved from cartriages to disks and how the first nintendo copied atari and made a home console.

Point is, everything copies another in some form or another. Your only kidding yourself if you think they dont.

Samus HD5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

@hellvaguy
Everything is going to be upgradeable so, moving from cartridges to Discs, making better online, it's not innovation, it's an upgrade. So making something new with gameplay,(the way how you play it,) that's innovation in VideoGame industry

Gamer-Z5207d ago (Edited 5207d ago )

@gamingdroid

Why is he trolling? If they are going to make a touchscreen based controller like nintendo then they are basically copying them and also you cant tell me Kinect wasn't made to compete with the wii's motion controller. Next time try a little less blind fanboyism and little more logic.

@hellvaguy

What you listed is not copying its called technology moving forward homez.

darthv725207d ago

IMO the move would be the direct competitor to the wii motion controller.

Kinect would be the competitor to the pseye. Not the eyetoy as many mistakenly proclaim. The live vision would be the equal to the eyetoy.

Just putting it into perspective.

CommonSense5206d ago

call what you wanna call it.

if it's not innovation, it's copying.

BISHOP-BRASIL5206d ago

Hey Darthv, I'm not saying you are wrong (as I don't know the whole list of Xbox Live Vision supported games), but as far as I know the Xbox Live Vision was used in games just as a common camera.

Most games just use to take photos or videochat. A couple of games use it for face mapping (as in making a polygonal version of yourself in game) and Viva Pinãta used it to read real cards for in-game content. I don't know of any game that used it for commands imput, so it wouldn't be a controller.

EyeToy on the other hand was primarily a motion control device, like Kinect. So I would say Kinect is a competitor to both PS cams, obviously more so to Eye as it's in the same generation.

BISHOP-BRASIL5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

Darthv corrected me by PM. Some games do use Vision as a controller.

But even with that said, I sustent that only Kinect and Eye(along with Move) actually compete in the market as they are on the same gen (unlike EyeToy) and were marketed as controllers (unlike Vision). Of course, Wiimote competes there with them (as they all end up promoting motion controlling).

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5206d ago
kevnb5207d ago

im not sure i like where things are headed, damn you apple for making people want tablets...

Honky Kong5206d ago

WTF? tablets are ancient history.

Amplitude5206d ago

Yeah but you cant exactly disagree with the fact that the iPad broadened the tablet audience quite a bit.

kevnb5206d ago

they were very niche before

Show all comments (168)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay15d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn216d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn215d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown15d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay15d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay15d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac15d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger16d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300015d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde15d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde15d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
40°

Microsoft lifts the lid on Project Helix at GDC Festival of Gaming

The Xbox maker will begin sending alpha versions of Project Helix to developers starting in 2027.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
240°

Xbox Confirms 'Project Helix', Its Next-Gen Console That Will Also Play PC Games

New Microsoft Gaming CEO Asha Sharma, who took over as the head of the Xbox business last week as longtime Xbox boss Phil Spencer retired, has confirmed the codename for Xbox's next-generation console – Project Helix – and also confirmed long-swirling rumors that the device will play Xbox and PC games.

69d ago
dveio69d ago

Hm.

Selling to customers the benefits of Xbox Helix compared to a PC and Steam Machine will be the biggest task for Xbox' marketing, I suppose.

69d ago Replies(2)
69d ago Replies(5)
1Victor68d ago

I said when Xbox destroyed their future with with all their arrogance at the start of XBone”if they keep loosing money they only have 2 more generations before they exit the console market like sega.
This is their final chance to validate the existence of a console to the INVESTORS if this console fail as we all know without exclusives from the activision acquisition or their old exclusives for more than a year it’s game over for Xbox consoles.
Everyone know games will wait for a timed exclusive to go to their console of choice, Microsoft signed the Xbox console death certificate the moment they started PORTING ALL THEIR GAMES to other consoles.
Now my hope is that Valve gives Sony a run for their money and we get a good generation where they take risks and bring new experiences to the market.

68d ago
S2Killinit68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

They will make xbox “consoles”, but they actively downplay consoles because their business strategy is walled garden services

This is basically a PC w xbox logo

fr0sty68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

Xbox has put itself in a tough position... With current RAM prices, the system is going to cost a fortune (it's APU alone is $500-600, before you even get to the RAM, SSD, power supply, etc). So, we're looking at a 4 digit price tag, and it has the Gabecube to compete against now directly in that console space. It has no exclusive games at all. PS6 is coming in close in performance but expected to cost hundreds less, and PS6 Pro will likely again take the "most powerful crown" once it drops, but it will actually have exclusive games.

Not an easy sell to the general public, and not even an easy sell to the PC enthusiasts as it isn't powerful enough to justify paying that much for when you could just build a far more powerful PC for not much more $. If I'm dropping north of $1k on a game system, I'm going to want to go all out, not have mid-range performance. It'll be interesting how they plan on marketing this thing, and who they expect to buy it.

Reaper22_68d ago

Looks like you dont know what you're talking about.

1Victor68d ago

What changed?
Hey obscured 🤖🤖
I’ll explain it like to a IQ 9
Nothing has changed they kept loosing money and to please their INVESTORS Microsoft purchased activision and other developers spending more money they could make in WAAAAAY too long for the company CEO that love monetizing everything so they started porting to EVERYTHING they could (even fire stick🤣🤣).
Do you know why it’s called the big 3?
In the lat 70’s to early 80’ there was multiple companies with their own consoles each the market collapsed and only 2 survived, enter PlayStation, exit sega, exit google, Microsoft is destabilized and desperately start to port all their games EVERYWHERE, enter valve.

Now
W h a t do Y O U think w i l l h a p p e n t o
t h e 3rd leg of that triangle when one is warbling and a replacement is on the way.

GhostScholar68d ago

Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated….

1Victor68d ago

@ghost: “ Loosing money ? Got it. You’re obviously educated…”
Sure I’m not a scholar but it’s obvious that they aren’t going to be publishing their big franchises day one games on their competitors because of brotherly love for the gaming industry.
Unless and I know this is something a lot of Xbox hardcore fans like obscure can’t comprehend that a big corporation like Microsoft is loosing money gen after gen,
Money doesn’t come for free from big corporations Xbox gen 1 lost money on consoles sold. Xbox 360 lost money on repairs of the RROD Xbox One didn’t make the money they wanted, Xbox series hasn’t sold as well as expected and have a MASIVE LOAN from all the studios and a publisher purchase..
I’ll be waiting for your reply proving they are not loosing money. Oh I see you pulling that game pass card, put it back FCC filing by Microsoft said they didn’t make money from game pass.
NOW PROVE ME WRONG

mudakoshaka67d ago (Edited 67d ago )

They had to put them on other platforms. All the gaming companies they bought cost a LOT of money. Xbox is not sufficient to bring in new revenue, so the only choice is expanding your market share by releasing on other platforms that are clearly leading the market. It was not something they wanted but something they needed to do to recoup some of all the expenses.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 67d ago
peppeaccardo68d ago

I might be saying the obvious but any piece of hardware for as powerful as it could be, without an healthy portfolio of fun to play and engaging games is worth less tehn zero. So as long as the new XBOX will be marketed as the most powerful console on the planet and NOT as the ONLY place where true long lastying XBOX fans can impersonate their beloved characters/heroes this thing is going to fail big. I would love to think that Playstaiton is moving away from the PC ports also to keep its identity, the truth is that a console value is higher if that console is the only mean to access certain IPs. XBOX with gamepass and PC ports has depersonalized his player and fan base.
Just my two cents ... but I am sure there is some thurth in here.
Peace on !

Reaper22_68d ago

Xbox has a huge library of great games. This new console will be able to play them all. Thats what gamers care about the most.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 67d ago
69d ago Replies(1)
Deathdeliverer69d ago

The question will be if you have a PC, why buy a Xbox that plays PC and Xbox games… Unless they plan to have you buy a Xbox PC instead of a dedicated PC. Thats got to be the plan. Take some of the PC players and turn them into console PC players. They couldn’t give you full access to the PC/console like you can with a dedicated PC because you would think the piracy for the “dedicated” Xbox games would be crazy. Yeah, they are really going to have to explain who this is for. If you can install whatever you want then you would have Steam access. This directly copies the Steam box idea so I’m sure Steam isn’t happy about it. I guess time will tell.

69d ago
Rainbowcookie68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

Maybe it will be heavily subsidized so software sales will make up the loss to get it into peoples hands early and the system allows for a steam like environment. I think Sony knows since rumor has it that they will do less Pc ports.

derek68d ago

I dont think that's in the cards not with the 80 plus billion spent on gaming this gen. Microsoft aint subsidizing hardware anymore look how they've priced the series consoles and offered no deals this past holidays. Sony pulling away from pc ports is because there is no good rational for continuing to do so.

ABizzel168d ago (Edited 68d ago )

They don’t sell enough of the current Xbox consoles to heavily subsidize those platforms and in fact they increased in price, so I don’t see a future where this gets any. I think we’re looking at a $999 platform, which I mean is great for a GPU rumored to be on par with a full PC running a RTX 5070Ti/5080 equivalent depending on clocks, since those GPUs alone around $1000+.

I assume they’re going to do a two tiered system again, because a lowered cost version could be the significantly better option for PC gamers specifically the esports crowd who doesn’t upgrade all the time and don’t care about the highest specs. If they can do something around a RX 9060 with 16GB+ of VRAM for $499 then that would be the true winner because it gives those PC gamers a REAL substantial upgrade at a very reasonable price. It’ll also put a huge amount of pressure on the Steam Box.

isarai_lee68d ago

What i was wondering too, like best case scenario it's a PC with a bunch of restrictions on it, and when ALL their games on on PC, what is even the incentive here? 🤔

ABizzel168d ago (Edited 68d ago )

It builds a niche for them, and I’ve been saying they should have done this since the XBO. However, it’s still going to be a battle. Hardcore PC gamers are not leaving PC unless this is an ultimate steal in price:performance.

The rumored spec depending on clock speeds should place this around RTX 5070TI / 5080 performance which sounds insane, but the rumored launch in late 2027 and the RTX 5070Ti/5080 will be almost 3 years old by then.

But those GPUs are retailing around $1000, so what is this PC-Console hybrid going to cost.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 68d ago
MrNinosan69d ago

Basically a PC with an Xbox logo slapped on, just like the so called Xbox handheld.
My guess is it won't play my Xbox games I have on disc 🤔

69d ago
babadivad68d ago

Nah, the handheld IS a PC. It can stream Xbox games or play the PC version of those games with "play anywhere".

This sounds like it will play Xbox games natively, which is amazing if true.

I want to see more. I already have a powerful PC so I need to be sold on this before just diving in. Tech whore that I am. Seems very interesting so far, regardless.

DazaMc68d ago

Perhaps it will download a compatible version if you have the disc in.

Reaper22_68d ago

You just described all consoles. At the end of the day they're all PCs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 68d ago
Show all comments (122)